The George Washington University vs Noroff School of Technology and Digital Media vs NHH Norwegian School of Economics vs SUNY Empire State vs University of Agder - uia
Side-by-side comparison from 19 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Experienced and knowledgeable faculty
- +Supportive environment and student care
- +Relevant programs with practical opportunities
Nothing to show
- +Free tuition and diverse program options
- +High quality education and international exchange opportunities
- +Supportive environment and welcoming community
- +Accessible, flexible remote learning options
- +Supportive and responsive professors
- +Personalized learning and goal-setting support
- +Welcoming international environment and modern facilities
- +Excellent research opportunities and advanced tools
- +Knowledgeable and supportive professors
Nothing to show
- +strong technical and practical focus on systems
- +sustainability and real-world application
- +analytical thinking and problem-solving
- -Administrative & management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of clear communication and responsiveness from staff is a recurring problem.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a recurring concern.
- -Poor teaching quality and curriculum relevance are often criticized.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support negatively impact student experience.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant concern.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are frequently criticized.
- -Course content and teaching quality are often found to be subpar.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and unresponsive staff are common complaints.
This institution demonstrates strong performance in its facilities, earning a near-perfect score. Professors and location also received high marks. Student life and accommodation are rated well, while internationality shows a solid standing. The value for money is also a key strength. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded offering with its strongest aspects in physical resources and academic environment.
Nothing to show
This institution receives exceptionally high marks for its facilities and accommodation, both scoring an outstanding 4.7. Professors and internationality are also strong points, with ratings of 4.4. Student life and value for money are rated at 4.3 and 4.1 respectively. The university's location is its weakest area, though still a respectable 4.1.
Overall, this institution demonstrates considerable strengths. Student life stands out with a perfect score, alongside excellent ratings for professors and internationality. Accommodation, location, and value also receive strong marks. The facilities, while still rated positively, appear to be the relatively weakest area, though still above average.
This institution garners high marks across most aspects, with outstanding facilities rated a perfect 5. Professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value all receive a solid 4. The strongest area is clearly its facilities, while the other evaluated categories demonstrate a consistently strong, though less exceptional, performance.
Nothing to show
This institution receives strong marks in several key areas. Its facilities, location, student life, and accommodation are all rated highly at 4 out of 5. While professors and internationality are rated a respectable 3, these represent the weakest aspects of the university's profile. Overall, the university offers good value for students.
All 7 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.43/5. Students praise the excellent infrastructure, experienced faculty, and affordability. They also highlight structured programs, diverse course content, and unique learning opportunities.
Nothing to show
Reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~0% negative feedback. Students praise the free tuition and wide range of masters specializations, highlighting a conducive academic and diverse environment.
With a 4.67/5 average rating from 3 reviews, ~100% are positive. Students highlight professors being nice and responsive, with asynchronous remote learning being beneficial for focus and busy schedules. One suggestion mentioned more remote engagement activities.
With one review, the average rating is 4 out of 5 stars, indicating a positive experience. The feedback highlights a welcoming international environment, modern facilities, and opportunities for research skill development.
Nothing to show
The program is highly rated at 4/5 stars, with ~100% positive feedback. Students appreciate the focus on modern society's power infrastructure and systems. The curriculum emphasizes technical skills, analytical thinking, and practical problem-solving, particularly in sustainability.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
