Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro - UFRJ vs Estácio vs Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro vs Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro vs Instituto Federal Fluminense

Side-by-side comparison from 45 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro - UFRJ: wins 0/2 categories
Estácio: wins 0/2 categories
Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro: wins 0/2 categories
Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro: wins 1/2 categories
Instituto Federal Fluminense: wins 1/2 categories
Augusto Motta University Centre - UNSUAM: wins 0/2 categories
Brazilian Institute of Rehabilitation Medicine - IBMR: wins 0/2 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Architecture and Urbanism
Sao Paulo, Brazil
4.20
Read more reviews
23 reviews
×
Best programme: Law
Best programme: Library and Information Science
Best programme: Agriculture
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
5.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Physical Education
Best programme: Criminology and Law
Best programme: Bachelor in ICT
Category ratings
Facilities
3.20
4.05
4.00
4.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
Location
3.53
4.00
4.00
3.50
5.00
Win
4.00
4.00
Professors
4.40
4.27
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
Internationality
4.27
3.41
4.00
5.00
Win
4.00
2.00
3.00
Student life
3.57
4.05
4.00
4.50
5.00
4.00
5.00
Value
4.60
3.68
4.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
3.00
Accommodation
3.00
3.50
3.00
3.00
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Extensive opportunities for research and extracurricular projects.
  • +High-quality, knowledgeable professors and mentors.
  • +Strong industry connections and company partnerships.
  • +Excellent professors and quality teaching
  • +Flexible class schedules and balance with other responsibilities
  • +Good infrastructure and student benefits/opportunities
  • +Highly qualified faculty and diverse educational techniques
  • +Freedom to explore various areas of knowledge
  • +Excellent teaching and professor support
  • +Diverse and inclusive environment
  • +Wide course variety
  • +New facilities and resources
  • +Enjoyable learning experience
  • +Excellent teaching and well-structured programs.
  • +Abundant student amenities and resources like the library.
  • +Supportive environment and helpful staff.
  • +Practical and accessible learning environment
  • +Helpful professors and useful classes
  • +Welcoming atmosphere
Cons
  • -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a common complaint.
  • -Concerns exist about the quality of teaching and curriculum.
  • -Administrative and management issues negatively impact student experience.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and lack of support for distance learning students are problematic.
  • -The institution's financial focus overshadows student welfare and education.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning and comfort.
  • -Poor communication and lack of responsiveness from staff are a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Teaching quality and curriculum relevance are frequently criticized.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor technology hinder learning.
  • -Lack of support and unclear expectations lead to student dissatisfaction.
  • -administrative and management issues
  • -outdated facilities
  • -lack of adequate resources and support
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistently problematic.
  • -Inefficient administrative processes and lack of clear communication cause frustration.
  • -Limited course selection and rigid academic policies hinder student progress.
Rating summary
What students say

Overall, this university demonstrates a strong performance, particularly excelling in **Value** and **Professors**, both receiving very high marks. **Internationality** is also a significant strength. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerges as the weakest area, scoring the lowest. **Facilities** and **Location** received moderate ratings, while **Student Life** is also a positive aspect.

This institution receives strong acclaim for its **Professors**, scoring an impressive 4.27. **Facilities** and **Student Life** are also well-regarded, both earning 4.05. The **Location** is rated at a solid 4.0. However, **Accomodation** stands out as a weaker area with a rating of 3.5, and **Internationality** also presents a lower score at 3.41. **Value** falls in the middle at 3.68.

Overall, the university garners solid ratings across multiple aspects. It particularly excels in the **Professors** category, achieving a perfect score. **Facilities**, **Location**, **Student Life**, and **Internationality** all received strong marks at 4 out of 5. The lowest rating was for **Accomodation** at 3, indicating this area might benefit from further development. The **Value** proposition is also rated positively at 4.

This university scores exceptionally well in areas such as professors, student life, and internationality, all receiving perfect or near-perfect marks. Value for money is also a standout strength. Conversely, accommodation presents the weakest aspect, with a rating of 3, while facilities and location fall in the mid-range. Overall, it offers a highly regarded academic and social experience.

This institution demonstrates exceptional strength across key areas, receiving perfect scores for its facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, and overall value. The university also boasts a strong international presence, indicated by its high rating in that category. While overall performance is outstanding, a slightly lower score in internationality suggests this is an area with room for further enhancement.

This university garners top marks for its facilities, professors, and perceived value, all receiving perfect scores. Student life and location are also considered strong points, rated at a solid 4. However, the university struggles significantly in the accommodation category, scoring a zero, and its internationality is rated low at 2.

Exceptional marks highlight the university's strengths in facilities, professors, student life, and accommodation, all receiving perfect scores. Conversely, internationality and value are identified as areas for improvement, with lower ratings of 3. The location also received a good, but not perfect, score of 4.

Reviews summary
Highlights

All 16 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.44/5. Students highlight enriching experiences, valuable classes, and numerous opportunities for research and projects. Some mention infrastructure issues and teaching methods as minor drawbacks.

~87% of reviews are positive, highlighting excellent professors, good infrastructure, and flexible schedules. A small portion of feedback (~13%) mentions concerns about financial focus and inconsistent teaching.

Based on one review, the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro is highly rated at 4/5 stars. The positive feedback highlights qualified faculty and a conducive campus environment. Infrastructure and scholarship incentives were noted for improvement.

With an average rating of 4.5/5 from two reviews, students praise the university's great teachers, diverse courses, and supportive professors. The calm, safe environment and inclusive atmosphere are also highlighted, with no negative feedback recorded.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, this university has received overwhelmingly positive feedback. The single review highlights a positive learning experience, particularly with newly established courses and facilities.

This university has a single positive review, contributing to a perfect 5/5 average rating. The feedback highlights great teachers, ample student amenities, and a well-structured program with diverse learning activities. A well-stocked library and helpful librarians were also praised.

With an average rating of 5/5, the single review is entirely positive. The reviewer found professors helpful, classes practically useful, and the environment welcoming, recommending the university for a practical experience.

Rating distribution
5★
44%
52%
0%
50%
100%
100%
100%
4★
56%
30%
100%
50%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
9%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close