Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro - UFRJ vs Estácio vs Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro - UERJ vs University of Cândido Mendes - UCAM vs Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro

Side-by-side comparison from 50 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro - UFRJ: wins 1/4 categories
Estácio: wins 0/4 categories
Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro - UERJ: wins 0/4 categories
University of Cândido Mendes - UCAM: wins 0/4 categories
Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro: wins 0/4 categories
Augusto Motta University Centre - UNSUAM: wins 1/4 categories
Brazilian Institute of Rehabilitation Medicine - IBMR: wins 2/4 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Architecture and Urbanism
Sao Paulo, Brazil
4.10
Read more reviews
28 reviews
×
Best programme: Law
Best programme: Computer and Information Science
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Library and Information Science
Best programme: Criminology and Law
Best programme: Bachelor in ICT
Category ratings
Facilities
3.20
3.92
4.00
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Win
4.50
Location
3.53
3.96
4.50
Not rated
4.00
4.00
4.50
Professors
4.40
4.11
4.50
Not rated
5.00
5.00
5.00
Internationality
4.27
Win
3.22
3.00
Not rated
4.00
2.00
3.00
Student life
3.57
3.81
3.50
Not rated
4.00
4.00
4.50
Win
Value
4.60
3.67
5.00
Not rated
4.00
5.00
3.00
Accommodation
3.00
3.35
2.50
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
3.50
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Extensive opportunities for research and extracurricular projects.
  • +High-quality, knowledgeable professors and mentors.
  • +Strong industry connections and company partnerships.
  • +Excellent professors and practical teaching
  • +Supportive customer service and user-friendly online platform
  • +Good infrastructure and flexible learning options
  • +Excellent professors and project encouragement
  • +Strong infrastructure and facilities
  • +Career opportunities and international recognition

Nothing to show

  • +Highly qualified faculty and diverse educational techniques
  • +Freedom to explore various areas of knowledge
  • +Excellent teaching and well-structured programs.
  • +Abundant student amenities and resources like the library.
  • +Supportive environment and helpful staff.
  • +Practical and accessible learning with helpful professors
  • +Supportive and welcoming environment fostering friendships
  • +Good cost-benefit value and local convenience
Cons
  • -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a common complaint.
  • -Concerns exist about the quality of teaching and curriculum.
  • -Financial prioritization over student well-being and care.
  • -Lack of academic and administrative support, especially for distance learners.
  • -Poor course organization and inconsistent teaching methods.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring problem.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning and comfort.
  • -Poor communication and lack of responsiveness from staff are a recurring problem.
  • -administrative and management issues
  • -outdated facilities
  • -lack of adequate resources and support
  • -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are recurring complaints.
  • -Lack of updated curriculum and resources is a significant concern.
Rating summary
What students say

Overall, this university demonstrates a strong performance, particularly excelling in **Value** and **Professors**, both receiving very high marks. **Internationality** is also a significant strength. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerges as the weakest area, scoring the lowest. **Facilities** and **Location** received moderate ratings, while **Student Life** is also a positive aspect.

This institution performs strongest in its **Professors** category, earning a high rating. **Facilities** and **Location** also received favorable scores. The university's **Accomodation** and **Internationality** are its weakest areas, indicating potential room for improvement in these aspects. Overall ratings reflect a solid performance with distinct areas of excellence and those requiring further development.

The university exhibits strong performance in key areas, particularly in **Value (5)**, **Professors (4.5)**, and **Location (4.5)**. Conversely, **Accomodation (2.5)** stands out as the weakest aspect. Other areas, including Facilities and Student Life, receive solid scores, while Internationality is rated moderately.

Nothing to show

Overall, the university garners solid ratings across multiple aspects. It particularly excels in the **Professors** category, achieving a perfect score. **Facilities**, **Location**, **Student Life**, and **Internationality** all received strong marks at 4 out of 5. The lowest rating was for **Accomodation** at 3, indicating this area might benefit from further development. The **Value** proposition is also rated positively at 4.

This university garners top marks for its facilities, professors, and perceived value, all receiving perfect scores. Student life and location are also considered strong points, rated at a solid 4. However, the university struggles significantly in the accommodation category, scoring a zero, and its internationality is rated low at 2.

The university receives commendations for its excellent facilities, dedicated professors, and appealing location and student life, all scoring highly. Conversely, accommodation and internationality present areas for improvement, with lower scores. The overall value is rated moderately, suggesting room for enhancement in this aspect.

Reviews summary
Highlights

All 16 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.44/5. Students highlight enriching experiences, valuable classes, and numerous opportunities for research and projects. Some mention infrastructure issues and teaching methods as minor drawbacks.

~83% of reviews are positive, praising excellent professors, good infrastructure, and user-friendly online platforms. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions concerns about financial focus, online student support, and course organization.

With a 4/5 average rating from two reviews, student feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Positive themes highlight excellent infrastructure, career opportunities, and great laboratories. Minor concerns about room ventilation and bathrooms were noted.

Nothing to show

Based on one review, the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro is highly rated at 4/5 stars. The positive feedback highlights qualified faculty and a conducive campus environment. Infrastructure and scholarship incentives were noted for improvement.

This university has a single positive review, contributing to a perfect 5/5 average rating. The feedback highlights great teachers, ample student amenities, and a well-structured program with diverse learning activities. A well-stocked library and helpful librarians were also praised.

All (100%) reviews are positive, averaging 5/5 stars. Students highlight excellent quality, great support, and a welcoming environment. They found their studies valuable and a good cost-benefit option.

Rating distribution
5★
44%
46%
0%
0%
0%
100%
100%
4★
56%
36%
100%
0%
100%
0%
0%
3★
0%
7%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
7%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close