Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro - UFRJ vs Estácio vs Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro - UERJ vs Pontificate Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro - PUC-Rio vs Instituto Federal Fluminense

Side-by-side comparison from 57 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro - UFRJ: wins 0/3 categories
Estácio: wins 0/3 categories
Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro - UERJ: wins 0/3 categories
Pontificate Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro - PUC-Rio: wins 1/3 categories
Instituto Federal Fluminense: wins 2/3 categories
Augusto Motta University Centre - UNSUAM: wins 0/3 categories
Brazilian Institute of Rehabilitation Medicine - IBMR: wins 0/3 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Architecture and Urbanism
Sao Paulo, Brazil
4.10
Read more reviews
29 reviews
×
Best programme: Law
Best programme: Computer and Information Science
Best programme: Architecture and Urban Planning
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
5.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Physical Education
Best programme: Criminology and Law
Best programme: Bachelor in ICT
Category ratings
Facilities
3.20
3.89
3.00
4.40
5.00
5.00
4.50
Location
3.53
3.96
3.67
5.00
5.00
4.00
4.50
Professors
4.40
4.11
4.67
4.60
5.00
5.00
5.00
Internationality
4.27
3.14
3.33
4.60
Win
4.00
2.00
3.00
Student life
3.57
3.78
3.00
4.60
5.00
Win
4.00
4.50
Value
4.60
3.64
3.67
5.00
5.00
5.00
3.00
Accommodation
3.00
3.29
2.67
3.50
5.00
Win
Not rated
3.50
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Extensive opportunities for research and extracurricular projects.
  • +High-quality, knowledgeable professors and mentors.
  • +Strong industry connections and company partnerships.
  • +Excellent professors and teaching quality
  • +Supportive customer service and user-friendly online platform
  • +Good infrastructure and flexible learning options
  • +Excellent teaching quality and knowledgeable professors
  • +Strong career opportunities and project encouragement
  • +Good laboratories and infrastructure, despite some facility issues
  • +Excellent professors and robust academic content
  • +Welcoming environment and opportunities for growth
  • +Promising professional prospects and good organization
  • +New facilities and resources
  • +Enjoyable learning experience
  • +Excellent teaching and well-structured programs.
  • +Abundant student amenities and resources like the library.
  • +Supportive environment and helpful staff.
  • +Practical and accessible learning with helpful professors
  • +Supportive and welcoming environment fostering friendships
  • +Good cost-benefit value and local convenience
Cons
  • -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a common complaint.
  • -Concerns exist about the quality of teaching and curriculum.
  • -Financial focus over student care and support.
  • -Lack of clear guidance and disorganization in online courses.
  • -Inconsistent teaching methods and poor administrative response.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration and inefficiency.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning experiences.
  • -Lack of clear communication and transparency creates uncertainty.
  • -Administrative and management issues create frustration and inefficiency.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning experiences.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a common problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor technology hinder learning.
  • -Lack of support and unclear expectations lead to student dissatisfaction.
  • -administrative and management issues
  • -outdated facilities
  • -lack of adequate resources and support
  • -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are recurring complaints.
  • -Lack of updated curriculum and resources is a significant concern.
Rating summary
What students say

Overall, this university demonstrates a strong performance, particularly excelling in **Value** and **Professors**, both receiving very high marks. **Internationality** is also a significant strength. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerges as the weakest area, scoring the lowest. **Facilities** and **Location** received moderate ratings, while **Student Life** is also a positive aspect.

Academic and extracurricular offerings are generally well-regarded, with professors receiving a notable 4.11 and student life scoring a respectable 3.78. Facilities are also rated favorably at 3.89. However, areas such as accommodation (3.29) and internationality (3.14) present the weakest aspects of the university's profile. Value for money is rated moderately at 3.64.

This university presents a mixed but generally positive rating profile. Its strongest area is consistently Professors, receiving an excellent score. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest point. Other aspects such as Facilities and Student Life are rated moderately, while Location and Value show solid performance. Internationality also scores mid-range.

This institution garners exceptional scores in several key areas, with Location and Value both achieving a perfect 5. Professors, Student Life, and Internationality also stand out with strong ratings of 4.6. Facilities are well-regarded at 4.4. The primary area for improvement identified is Accomodation, which received the lowest score of 3.5.

This institution demonstrates exceptional strength across key areas, receiving perfect scores for its facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, and overall value. The university also boasts a strong international presence, indicated by its high rating in that category. While overall performance is outstanding, a slightly lower score in internationality suggests this is an area with room for further enhancement.

This university garners top marks for its facilities, professors, and perceived value, all receiving perfect scores. Student life and location are also considered strong points, rated at a solid 4. However, the university struggles significantly in the accommodation category, scoring a zero, and its internationality is rated low at 2.

The university receives commendations for its excellent facilities, dedicated professors, and appealing location and student life, all scoring highly. Conversely, accommodation and internationality present areas for improvement, with lower scores. The overall value is rated moderately, suggesting room for enhancement in this aspect.

Reviews summary
Highlights

All 16 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.44/5. Students highlight enriching experiences, valuable classes, and numerous opportunities for research and projects. Some mention infrastructure issues and teaching methods as minor drawbacks.

~83% of reviews are positive, praising excellent professors, quality teaching, and good online platforms. A small percentage (~10%) express concerns about financial focus and lack of student support.

All three reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.33/5. Recurring positive themes include excellent teachers and good infrastructure. Some minor concerns were raised about room ventilation and bathroom conditions.

With an average rating of 4.6/5 from 5 reviews, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight excellent professors, great facilities, and academic/professional growth opportunities.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, this university has received overwhelmingly positive feedback. The single review highlights a positive learning experience, particularly with newly established courses and facilities.

This university has a single positive review, contributing to a perfect 5/5 average rating. The feedback highlights great teachers, ample student amenities, and a well-structured program with diverse learning activities. A well-stocked library and helpful librarians were also praised.

All (100%) reviews are positive, averaging 5/5 stars. Students highlight excellent quality, great support, and a welcoming environment. They found their studies valuable and a good cost-benefit option.

Rating distribution
5★
44%
45%
33%
60%
100%
100%
100%
4★
56%
34%
67%
40%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
10%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
7%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close