University Of Central Punjab - UCP vs Lahore College for Women University - LCWU vs King Edward Medical University vs University of Lahore vs National College of Business Administration and Economics

Side-by-side comparison from 67 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: University of Child Health Sciences, Lahore (5.00)
University Of Central Punjab - UCP: wins 0/7 categories
Lahore College for Women University - LCWU: wins 0/7 categories
King Edward Medical University: wins 0/7 categories
University of Lahore: wins 0/7 categories
National College of Business Administration and Economics: wins 0/7 categories
Lahore Leads University: wins 0/7 categories
University of Child Health Sciences, Lahore: wins 7/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Computer Engineering
Best programme: Botany
Best programme: Bachelor of Medicine
Lahore, Pakistan
3.90
Read more reviews
20 reviews
×
Best programme: Civil Engineering
Best programme: Bachelor of Business Administration
Best programme: Bachelor of Nursing
Category ratings
Facilities
4.44
3.80
4.33
4.16
3.00
3.00
5.00
Win
Location
4.31
4.60
3.67
3.75
3.67
3.00
5.00
Win
Professors
4.45
4.00
4.33
4.00
3.67
4.00
5.00
Win
Internationality
3.82
4.00
4.33
3.60
2.67
1.00
5.00
Win
Student life
4.26
4.20
4.00
4.11
3.00
3.00
5.00
Win
Value
4.06
4.00
4.33
3.90
3.33
4.00
5.00
Win
Accommodation
3.97
3.67
4.33
3.45
2.67
3.00
5.00
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High-quality, practical teaching and experienced faculty
  • +Positive and welcoming campus environment with good facilities
  • +Opportunities for financial stability and career advancement
  • +Strong academic programs and engaging, practical teaching
  • +Supportive and approachable faculty and staff
  • +Safe and well-equipped learning environment
  • +Experienced faculty and practical learning methods
  • +Well-equipped facilities and convenient amenities
  • +Prestigious reputation and challenging yet rewarding academic environment
  • +Supportive faculty and strong theoretical foundation
  • +Access to advanced labs and practical experience
  • +Good study environment and facilities
  • +Expert faculty & outcome-based education
  • +Engaging professors & strong class participation
  • +Cooperative administration & good infrastructure

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive teachers and practical education
  • +Personal and professional development
  • +Nurturing and caring environment
Cons
  • -Poor basic facilities and uncomfortable living conditions
  • -Overcrowded spaces and limited study areas
  • -Low quality canteen food and inadequate prayer facilities
  • -Lack of resources and connections for research in science departments.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a consistent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources negatively impact the learning environment.
  • -Inflexible course structures and unclear communication cause student dissatisfaction.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated curriculum and teaching methods are a significant concern.
  • -Poor facilities and maintenance, including non-functional amenities, are disliked.
  • -Administrative and management issues, including poor student-teacher communication and lack of career counseling.
  • -Limited co-curricular activities and a general lack of student engagement opportunities.
  • -Unhelpful faculty members, with very few exceptions.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are consistently criticized.
  • -Ineffective teaching methods and a lack of practical application are major complaints.
Rating summary
What students say

This university garners strong marks, particularly for its professors and facilities, both scoring above 4.4. Student life and location also receive favorable ratings. Areas for potential improvement include internationality and accommodation, which are rated lower than other aspects. The overall value is considered good, with a rating above 4.0.

The university excels particularly in its **location**, receiving a strong 4.6 rating. Student life, internationality, and professor quality are also well-regarded, all scoring a solid 4. The weakest areas, though still respectable, are facilities (3.8) and accommodation (3.67). Overall, value is rated highly at 4.

With excellent scores across most aspects, this institution particularly shines in its **Facilities, Professors, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value**, all receiving approximately 4.3 out of 5. Student life also scores well at a solid 4. The weakest area, though still respectable, is **Location**, which garnered a rating of 3.7.

This institution receives strong marks for its **Facilities** (4.16) and **Student Life** (4.11). **Professors** also garnered a respectable score of 4. Areas that could be improved include **Accomodation** (3.45) and **Internationality** (3.6). Overall, the university presents a generally positive picture with some standout strengths.

This university shows a mixed performance in its ratings. Its strongest areas are Professors and Location, both scoring an average of 3.67. Conversely, Accomodation and Internationality are its weakest points, each receiving a score of 2.67. Facilities and Student Life also averaged a moderate 3, while Value sits slightly above average at 3.33.

Nothing to show

This institution garners perfect scores across all evaluated aspects. Its facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value are all rated a flawless 5 out of 5. This indicates a consistently strong and highly desirable university experience, with no single area standing out as a particular weakness or strength relative to others.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Approximately 94% of reviews are positive, highlighting impressive teaching, financial stability, and a good campus experience. A small percentage of negative feedback mentioned issues with facilities and overcrowding.

With an average rating of 3.5/5, roughly 67% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong academics, approachable professors, and engaging classes. Approximately 17% of feedback is negative, with one mention of issues in the science department's research support.

Reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%), with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise experienced teachers, modern facilities, and the university's prestige, particularly highlighting the attached hospitals and transport.

Approximately 75% of reviews are positive, highlighting supportive departments, research focus, and good study environments. A small portion (~10%) notes issues like outdated curriculum and poor facilities.

Around 67% of reviews are positive, highlighting good faculty, infrastructure, and an engaging learning environment. Approximately 33% of feedback mentioned unhelpful faculty and a lack of career counseling and co-curricular activities.

Nothing to show

The sole review is highly positive, with a 5/5 rating, praising the quality of education and practical work. The reviewer highlighted effective teaching and personal development support.

Rating distribution
5★
48%
0%
33%
35%
33%
0%
100%
4★
39%
67%
67%
40%
33%
0%
0%
3★
6%
17%
0%
15%
0%
100%
0%
2★
3%
17%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
3%
0%
0%
10%
33%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
They could not care less about your education

One of the worst universities i have ever been to. It was a huge mistake to study. They cannot even provide the basic facilities. No trees no AC for students in halls. Canteen food may cause food poisoning. In month of june and july it gets unbearable. Their prayer area is a JOKE, designated in second basement in a corner of parking garage where we pray for jummah and you cannot even imagine how bad it gets when 200 people pray together without ac or fans. I have not even started on the staff yet and this is how bad it is. PLEASE whatever you do dont take admission here. My entire degree felt like it was prison camp. They are creating building on top of building but they cannot create a simple garden or masjid. All they want is your money and could not care less about your education.

Nothing to show

Medical university

For me, it was a big achievement to get admission at the King Edward medical university. You really have to work hard to reach this institute and even harder to survive here. But the situation is not bad.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close