Tampere University - TUNI vs Aalto University vs South-Eastern Finland University of Applied Sciences - XAMK vs Haaga-Helia University of Applied Sciences vs Arcada University of Applied Sciences - UAS
Side-by-side comparison from 121 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive faculty and flexible personal study plans
- +Welcoming international environment and diverse student body
- +Well-structured programs with practical application and research opportunities
- +Interdisciplinary studies and cross-major flexibility
- +Independent learning and hands-on, practical experiences
- +Strong community support and active student life
- +Passionate, supportive, and communicative educators
- +Practical, career-focused programmes and real-world connections
- +International atmosphere and flexible learning paths
- +Supportive environment and approachable staff
- +Practical, business-focused curriculum with real-world application
- +International community and diverse learning experiences
- +Practical, relevant learning and real-world projects
- +Supportive and knowledgeable staff
- +Modern facilities and updated resources
- +Practical study experience with supportive faculty and accessible campus facilities.
- +Welcoming and diverse campus environment fostering social opportunities.
- +Efficient education and proximity to nature for leisure.
- +Applied learning and hands-on experience
- +Supportive and approachable staff and faculty
- +High-tech facilities and resources
- -Administrative and management issues, particularly due to university reforms.
- -Lack of responsiveness and clarity from administration.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
- -Insufficient academic support and resources.
- -Inefficient administrative processes cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and transparency from staff creates confusion.
- -Inefficient administrative processes and unresponsive management create significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources hinder learning and comfort.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from faculty and staff leads to confusion and dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support are prevalent concerns.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor resource allocation are consistently criticized.
- -A lack of effective teaching and curriculum relevance is a major concern.
- -Administrative and management issues are a major source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are a recurring problem.
- -Inconsistent course quality and curriculum concerns are frequently mentioned.
The university garners significant acclaim, particularly in **Student Life**, which stands out with a 4.74 rating. **Facilities** also score very highly at 4.63. Areas such as **Accomodation** (4.24), **Professors** (4.26), and **Value** (4.26) show solid performance. **Internationality** is rated at 4.11, and **Location** is the lowest scored category at 4.06, though still strong.
This institution exhibits a strong overall performance, particularly excelling in its **Facilities**, which received the highest rating. **Student Life** and **Internationality** also scored very well. The **Location** emerged as the area with the lowest rating, though it still falls within a generally positive range. The university demonstrates a commendable balance across its assessed aspects.
This institution earns exceptionally high marks, particularly in the **professors** category with a near-perfect score. **Facilities** and **internationality** also stand out with strong ratings. Areas receiving slightly lower, though still positive, scores include **student life** and **accommodation**. Overall, the university demonstrates a well-rounded positive profile.
Exceptional marks are awarded for its **location** (4.86) and **internationality** (4.75), showcasing significant strengths. **Facilities** also score highly at 4.38. Conversely, **professors** represent the weakest area with a rating of 3.63. **Student life** (3.86) and **accommodation** (3.88) are moderately rated, while **value** sits at a respectable 4.13.
This institution demonstrates outstanding strengths in its **Professors**, achieving a perfect score. Facilities and Value also receive exceptionally high marks. Conversely, Accomodation is the lowest-rated category. Other aspects like Location, Student Life, and Internationality are well-regarded, indicating a generally positive student experience.
This institution garners exceptional scores, notably achieving a perfect 5 for Student Life. Facilities, Professors, and Accommodation are also highly rated at 4.33. Location and Internationality are solid at 4, with Value also receiving a 4. The weakest area, though still positive, is Value at 4.
This institution garners impressive scores across multiple facets. The strongest areas include Value, marked at 4.71, and Facilities, with a rating of 4.5. Professors also receive a high mark at 4.57. Student Life, rated at 4, stands as the relatively weakest point among the surveyed categories, though still a solid score. Other areas like Location and Accomodation also reflect positive feedback.
With a 4.43 average rating from 35 reviews, approximately 74% praise the inclusive environment, supportive teachers, and flexible study plans. A small portion (~3%) notes declining teaching quality due to university reformation.
The university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback (~100% of reviews) with an average rating of 4.44/5. Recurring themes highlight the value of interdisciplinary studies, independent learning, and strong community support.
All 26 reviews are positive, averaging 4.88/5. Students praise practical, student-centered education, supportive teachers, and innovation. A minor concern was difficulty securing clinical practice due to language skills.
With a 4.22/5 average, ~88% of reviews are positive, praising supportive staff, international programs, and practical business learning. Some students desire more social and extracurricular activities. No negative feedback was recorded.
All 100% of reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.25/5. Students highlight a sense of belonging, welcoming staff, practical learning, and modern facilities. Some mention concern about course scheduling.
All feedback is positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5 stars. Students highlight practical study experiences, excellent welfare and social activities, and a welcoming, diverse campus environment.
All 7 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.43/5. Students highlight HAMK's dynamic, supportive learning environment, real-world application strategies, and hands-on guidance from approachable faculty.
Nothing to show
I graduated from Aalto University's School of Business, majoring in Marketing, and I'd genuinely recommend it. What made the biggest difference for me, though, was the freedom to take courses outside my own major. I ended up mixing in some technology and design courses with my marketing courses, and that has turned out to be one of the most useful parts of my degree.
Studying nursing at Xamk has been a practical and rewarding experience to me regardless of my previous background in-terms of profession. The programme strongly focuses on hands-on skills, simulation training, and clinical placements, which has helped me connect theory directly to real nursing practice. The teachers are supportive and approachable, and the learning environment encourages growth both professionally and personally, being able to also learn a new language (Finnish) within a short period of time with the help of Xamk has been a great milestone to me. Overall, Xamk has prepared me well for working life in healthcare.
Nothing to show
In all honesty, my university offers a fantastic level of education, dedicated and extensively knowledgeable lecturers, as well as a spacious, clean, modern campus. These items make it a great place to study. However, one specific trait that bothers me personally is that some of the more important courses are limited to a single period (half a semester), to make space for other courses that I deem unnecessary or that could be optional instead of mandatory. Overall, my experience at Arcada has been outstanding.
Nothing to show
The study modules are categorized sensibly and connected with each other. The lecturers speak english well, eager to explain to students what they know after many years of working on the field. The campus in Riihimäki is small but has enough equipment for studying and doing thesis work (as I am doing now).
