Cracow University of Economics - CUE vs University of Wroclaw - UWr vs SGH Warsaw School of Economics - SGH vs University of Lodz - UL vs Medical University of Lodz - UMED
Side-by-side comparison from 272 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Strong career prospects and degree recognition
- +Supportive and engaging academic environment with accessible instructors
- +Modern, adaptable teaching methods and open student-teacher dialogue
- +High-quality education with knowledgeable and supportive professors.
- +Welcoming international environment and vibrant student life in a beautiful city.
- +Practical learning and career-focused programs.
- +Inspiring academic environment and knowledgeable, supportive faculty
- +Strong focus on practical skills and real-world application
- +Prestigious reputation and pathway to a successful career
- +High-quality education with excellent, approachable professors and a supportive atmosphere.
- +Diverse, international, and social environment with many opportunities.
- +Modern, well-equipped facilities and a positive urban setting.
- +Strong theoretical foundations and well-prepared medical courses
- +Good communication and supportive teachers with small group learning
- +Opportunities for extracurricular activities and an English-language program
- +Supportive and experienced professors
- +Abundant student activities and communities
- +Strong academic programs and practical application
- +Helpful, knowledgeable professors and opportunities for professional development.
- +Creative, flexible courses and space for self-expression.
- +Modern campus with collaborative study spaces.
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor treatment by deans.
- -Outdated facilities and resources.
- -Lack of clear communication and disorganization.
- -Outdated and irrelevant course content, especially for English Philology majors.
- -Lack of promised opportunities outside of specific career paths like translation or business.
- -Severely underfunded facilities.
- -Bureaucracy and administrative issues
- -Lack of support and usability from online systems
- -Overbearing control over student organizations
- -Excessive administrative burdens and lack of efficient management.
- -Outdated or poorly maintained facilities and resources.
- -Unengaging curriculum and ineffective teaching methods.
- -Outdated study programs and irrelevant content.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment, particularly in labs.
- -Lack of professor guidance and student support in task completion.
- -Limited career opportunities and reliance on connections for jobs.
- -Poor communication and late information dissemination.
- -Unsatisfactory program quality and perceived lack of learning.
Analyzing the university's performance reveals significant strengths in student life, scoring 4.41, and facilities, rated at 4.4. Internationality and location also received strong scores. The weakest area identified is accommodation, with a rating of 3.84. Overall, the university demonstrates a positive academic and social environment, though improvements in housing could enhance the student experience further.
Overall, this institution garners favorable reviews across multiple aspects. The university excels in **Location**, receiving its highest score, suggesting it's a significant draw. **Professors** and **Value** also stand out with strong ratings. Conversely, **Accomodation** received the lowest score, indicating this area could be improved. Other aspects like Facilities, Student Life, and Internationality also maintain solid, above-average evaluations.
This university demonstrates a strong presence in key areas, with **Location** receiving the highest marks at 4.67. **Professors** and **Value** also perform well, scoring above 4.1. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the weakest area, rated at 3.58. Other categories like Facilities, Student Life, and Internationality all fall within a comparable, solid range, generally above 4.0.
This institution garners strong ratings across several key areas. Location and value are particularly well-regarded, achieving scores over 4.2. Internationality and professors also score highly, exceeding 4.1. While student life and accommodation are rated positively, facilities represent the weakest area among the surveyed categories.
This institution garners strong reviews, particularly excelling in **Internationality** with a score of 4.67, and **Student Life** at 4.5. Ratings for Facilities, Professors, Accomodation, and Value are consistently high, all around 4.33. The lowest rated aspect, though still solid, is **Location** at 4.0. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded and positively regarded experience for its students.
This institution demonstrates a strong appeal in its location, receiving a high rating of 4.4. Internationality also scores well at 4.2, alongside a robust student life at 4.0. Areas for potential improvement include accommodation, rated at 3.5, which is the lowest score. Facilities and professors both earned solid marks of 3.8, contributing to an overall favorable impression, with value sitting at a respectable 3.9.
This institution demonstrates particular strengths in its internationality, scoring a high 4.17. Location also received a solid 4. Areas for improvement are accommodation, with the lowest rating of 2.6, and facilities and value, both scoring 3.33. Professors and student life are rated moderately well, at 3.83 and 3.5 respectively.
Over 90% of reviews are positive, highlighting supportive culture, engaging academics, and future opportunities. A small fraction of feedback mentioned negative experiences with university administration.
University of Wrocław reviews are highly positive, averaging 4.36/5 based on 75 submissions. Students praise high-quality education, experienced professors, modern facilities, and a welcoming international community. A small amount of negative feedback (~4%) cites program structure and perceived lack of opportunities.
Around 96% of reviews are positive, praising the inspiring community, academic rigor, and dedicated faculty. A small percentage of feedback (around 4%) mentions issues with bureaucracy and administrative processes.
With a 4.13/5 average rating from 98 reviews, ~94% are positive, highlighting a high-quality education, supportive academic staff, and a social, dynamic city. No negative feedback was received.
With ~83% positive sentiment (4-5 stars), reviewers highlight good teaching, communication, and opportunities for learning and student life. A small portion (~17%) found the study program outdated and some material unhelpful.
~70% of reviews are positive, highlighting qualified and passionate professors, numerous student activities, and a pleasant atmosphere. ~20% mention outdated equipment and a lack of guidance or opportunities for development.
Most reviews (~74%) are positive, highlighting helpful professors and professional development opportunities. Some feedback (~17%) notes difficulties with communication and administrative processes.
Nothing to show
As a current master's student in the Communication Management program at the University of Wroclaw, I can confidently say that this journey has been one of the most enriching experiences of my life, not only academically, but also personally and professionally. 1. Global opportunities through Erasmus+: During my time here, I’ve joined two short-term BIP exchange programs in Spain and Romania (with a generous grant), and have a one-year exchange in Germany. These experiences have allowed me to meet peers from across Europe, learn in diverse settings, and grow both culturally and intellectually. 2. Serious research, strong support: I’m currently representing our Institute in a Monography research project of UWr, a valuable opportunity to engage deeply with academic work and collaborate with professors in a meaningful way. The opportunity is open for all students who wanna pursue an academic path. 3. Supportive and passionate faculty: The professors are not only knowledgeable but also truly approachable. In the first semester, I approached my professor for guidance on career path, research opportunities, and expressed my interest. She shared insightful experiences, motivated and encouraged me a lot. And she nominated me for the Monography research project under her supervision, and I got the opportunity. I'm grateful, honestly. 4. Practice-oriented learning: Unlike many programs that are heavy on theory, this one focuses on real-world projects, case studies, and group work - ideal for master's-level students who want to build practical skills for the workplace. Actually, I don't face much study pressure, I enjoy the courses. 5. International Office that really cares: The International Office team is incredibly helpful. During the application process, I was surprised that they always responded to my email inquiries quickly and helped me resolve any issues. When I study here, from paperworks support to academic/exchange activities, they are always ready to assist and create a welcoming environment for students from all over the world. 6. Peaceful lifestyle & affordable living: Wroclaw is a charming, student-friendly city with a mix of history and modernity. The cost of living is reasonable, making it accessible for many international students without compromising on quality of life. I travelled to many cities in European countries, but Wroclaw is one of the most peaceful and affordable cities. Although the English skills of the city officers are limited, they always try to support by using Google Translate or finding support people. Studying at the University of Wroclaw has opened doors I never imagined: from international networks to research, from personal growth to professional clarity. If you're looking for an educational experience that truly takes you beyond the classroom, this could be your next big step. I appreciate this experience and believe that this is a worthy step to open up many opportunities to explore the world!
Attending the Warsaw School of Economics has been an enriching journey. The academic standard is impressive, offering a variety of programs that balance solid theoretical knowledge with practical skills. Professors are highly qualified and foster engaging discussions that stimulate intellectual growth. The curriculum is current, reflecting global trends and addressing real-world issues. Accommodation options are diverse, with university dorms offering affordable yet basic living conditions, though they can be competitive to secure. Private rentals are also available, though they tend to be pricier, particularly close to the center of Warsaw. As a Polish student, the tuition fees are quite reasonable in comparison to other European institutions, making SGH an excellent investment in my education. Campus life is dynamic, with numerous student clubs, events, and opportunities to connect with others. The university cultivates a strong community spirit, and there’s always something going on whether academic, social, or cultural. All in all, SGH provides a well-rounded and fulfilling university experience.
I was an international student at the University of Lodz in Poland. I am very happy that I choose this university for my masters studies. May be for some one its not but the overall discipline is appreciable.
Nothing to show
What I like about my university and faculty is that I have a lot of possibilities to work on my development. I will meet here a lot of people from different countries and develop my social and soft skills, which are very important, for example in our future job. I cannot say a lot about my faculty yet, because I am here only for a few weeks, but I have very high hopes that it will be a well-spent time!
Nothing to show
