Indian Institute of Management Calcutta - IIMC vs St Xavier's College vs University of Calcutta vs Maulana Abul Kalam Azad University of Technology vs Ecole Intuit Lab

Side-by-side comparison from 44 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: George College (5.00)
Indian Institute of Management Calcutta - IIMC: wins 0/5 categories
St Xavier's College: wins 0/5 categories
University of Calcutta: wins 0/5 categories
Maulana Abul Kalam Azad University of Technology: wins 0/5 categories
Ecole Intuit Lab: wins 0/5 categories
BP Poddar Institute of Management and Technology: wins 0/5 categories
George College: wins 5/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Business Administration Management and Marketing
Best programme: Economics and Statistics
Best programme: Accounting and Finance
Best programme: Mechanical Engineering
Marseille, France
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor of Business Administration
Kolkata, India
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Marketing
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
4.29
4.08
4.00
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Win
Location
4.00
5.00
4.83
3.57
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Professors
4.00
4.57
4.38
4.29
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Win
Internationality
2.50
3.43
3.33
3.14
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Win
Student life
3.00
4.00
4.21
4.14
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Win
Value
3.50
5.00
4.38
3.86
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Accommodation
3.50
3.43
3.67
3.43
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Exceptional education and practical learning experiences
  • +Strong industry connections and placement opportunities
  • +Prestigious reputation and high-quality faculty
  • +Top-notch faculty and academic excellence
  • +Conducive environment for holistic development
  • +Strong placement assistance
  • +Strong academic foundation and expert faculty guidance
  • +Rich campus life and supportive learning environment
  • +Value for money and practical exposure
  • +Excellent and supportive faculty
  • +Vibrant campus life and activities
  • +Strong technical education and infrastructure

Nothing to show

  • +Positive college environment and atmosphere
  • +High-quality teaching faculty and good teacher-student relationships
  • +Practical, real-world teaching and industry insights
  • +Skill development and confidence building
  • +Energetic campus life and events
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are a common source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently criticized.
  • -Limited career support and unclear future prospects are a significant concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues frustrate students.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are a common complaint.
  • -Ineffective teaching and unsupportive faculty are frequently mentioned.
  • -No campus, college attendance, or college life.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
  • -Inconsistent or unclear communication from instructors and staff.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support exacerbates issues.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Facilities are outdated and in need of repair.
  • -Course content is irrelevant or poorly structured.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates considerable strengths, achieving solid ratings of 4 across facilities, professors, and location. Student life and accommodation are also viewed positively, with scores of 3 and 3.5 respectively. The university's weakest areas appear to be its internationality, receiving a 2.5 rating, and its value proposition, which also scored 3.5.

With exceptional scores, this institution excels in both **Location** and **Value**, both receiving perfect marks. **Professors** also garnered a very high rating. Conversely, the university's **Accomodation** and **Internationality** present areas for improvement, with the lowest scores in these categories. Facilities and student life received solid, above-average ratings.

An assessment of university ratings reveals a mixed but generally positive picture. The strongest areas are **Location** (4.83) and **Professors** and **Value** (both 4.38), indicating excellent surroundings and academic quality. **Student Life** also scores well (4.21). Conversely, **Accomodation** (3.67) and **Internationality** (3.33) present areas for improvement. Facilities (4.08) are rated competently.

This institution receives positive marks across multiple facets. Its strongest areas are its Professors and Student Life, both scoring above 4. The University also fares well in Facilities and Value. Areas requiring further attention include Internationality and Accomodation, which are rated the lowest. Location also shows room for improvement.

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates a remarkably consistent performance across all assessed areas. With perfect scores of 4 in Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value, there are no apparent weaknesses to highlight. The university excels equally in every aspect evaluated, suggesting a well-rounded and satisfactory experience for its students.

This institution achieves perfect scores in every assessed category. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value all received a top rating of 5 out of 5. The university demonstrates exceptional strength across its entire offering, with no single area falling below the highest possible mark.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.5/5 and 3 out of 4 reviews being positive, students praise the prestigious education, exceptional practical learning, and strong placement opportunities. No negative feedback was recorded.

With a 4.86/5 average, ~100% of reviews are positive. Students praise top-notch professors, strong academic competition, dedicated placement cells, and an environment conducive to overall development.

With an average rating of 4.17/5 from 24 reviews, approximately 74% are positive, highlighting strong academic foundations, supportive professors, and good learning environments. A very small percentage of feedback mentioned student politics as a drawback.

The university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~86% of reviews rating it 4-5 stars and an average rating of 4.14/5. Students highlight good faculty and infrastructure, though one review mentioned weak placements.

Nothing to show

With a 4/5 average rating, this university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback (~100%). Students praise the good college environment, atmosphere, and effective teaching faculties, noting positive teacher-student relationships.

With a perfect 5/5 average, this university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback. Students highlight a practical teaching approach, real-world insights, and skill-building opportunities, contributing to a highly impactful academic experience.

Rating distribution
5★
75%
86%
46%
29%
0%
0%
100%
4★
0%
14%
29%
57%
0%
100%
0%
3★
25%
0%
21%
14%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close