Nazarbayev University - NU vs Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences - HRO vs Technical University of Crete - TUC vs Universitat de Barcelona School of Economics vs Creighton University
Side-by-side comparison from 67 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Engaging teaching with real-world relevance
- +Supportive and expert faculty
- +Enriching campus life and culture
- +Real-world learning, hands-on projects, and industry focus
- +International environment and diverse student body
- +Program flexibility and personalized learning paths
- +Practical, hands-on learning and applied concepts
- +High-quality, knowledgeable, and inspiring educators
- +Relevant, evolving curriculum aligned with industry trends
- +Supportive and approachable professors and staff
- +Professional and personal growth opportunities
- +Overall positive and enriching experience
- +Career success and job readiness post-graduation
- +Strong alumni network and career support
Nothing to show
- +Top-tier lecturers and strong academic programmes
- +Diverse student body and international exposure
- +Opportunities for growth and career preparation
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from instructors is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a common complaint.
- -Course content is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly structured.
- -Administrative and management chaos with outdated program information.
- -Inadequate and impractical computer-based instruction.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Inconsistent course quality and teaching methods are a problem.
- -Administrative and management issues are a constant source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance create an unpleasant learning environment.
- -Lack of clear communication and responsiveness from staff is a recurring problem.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative & management issues are a significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistently criticized.
- -Lack of communication and unresponsiveness from staff are major complaints.
This institution receives excellent feedback, particularly for its **Accomodation**, which is rated the highest at 4.625. **Facilities** and **Student Life** also score remarkably well, both above 4.57. Conversely, **Location** emerges as the lowest-rated aspect, with a score of 3.97. Other areas like Professors, Internationality, and Value are all rated favorably above 4.36.
Campus amenities and its geographical setting stand out with the highest scores. Conversely, accommodation received the lowest rating. Other areas, including professors, student life, internationality, and value, all scored well above average, indicating a generally positive university experience.
This institution garners its highest marks for **Location**, scoring a commendable 4 out of 5. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the most significant challenge, with a low rating of 1.5. Other areas like Professors and Student Life fall within the mid-range, while Facilities and Internationality also received moderate scores. The overall value proposition is rated at 2.5.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its academic offerings and value, with Professors and Value receiving perfect scores. The Facilities and Location are also highly regarded, both scoring 4.5. Student Life and Internationality are solid with ratings of 4. The weakest area appears to be Accomodation, with a rating of 3.5.
This institution excels in several key areas, with perfect scores for **Location** and **Value**. **Facilities**, **Student Life**, and **Accomodation** also receive excellent marks. The university's weakest point is its **Internationality**, scoring a moderate 3. However, **Professors** are rated a respectable 3.5. Overall, it presents a strong offering with standout strengths.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates a strong overall performance, with its **Value** and **Location** standing out as particularly high-rated areas. **Student Life**, **Accomodation**, and **Professors** also received very positive scores, indicating a well-rounded experience. The **Facilities** are rated well, though slightly lower than these top-performing categories. The **Internationality** score represents the weakest area in this assessment.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%), with a 4.43 average rating. Students praise well-rounded education, engaging professors, lively campus life, and excellent facilities.
All 7 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.57/5. Students highlight hands-on learning, real-world experience, and international environments. Some wish for more structured courses or specific technical knowledge.
Most reviews are positive (~75%), highlighting practical workshops and excellent teachers. A minority (~25%) mention poor organization and lack of support during lab projects.
With an average rating of 4.5/5, ~100% of reviews are positive. Students found the experience enjoyable and enriching, highlighting qualified and approachable professors and supportive staff.
With an average rating of 4/5, student feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight successful career outcomes and consistent employment post-graduation. No negative feedback was received.
Nothing to show
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with a 4.65 average rating. ~94% of feedback highlights top-tier lecturers, a nurturing learning culture, and diverse student experiences. A small amount of feedback (~6%) notes challenges with accommodation security and booking policies.
I am a graduate of Master in Public Administration, year of 2019. The program was amazing as well as academic team of the School of Public Policy. The program is designed for working professionals with various backgrounds and interests which makes this program unique. Your groupmates are going to be from different age groups and work environments, but they will all share the same goal of succeeding in their career as well as sharpening their skills. Also this kind of diverse environment gives you a great chance to learn about other’s experiences and grasp an opinion on how dilemmas in civil service or public policy are solved in their organizations and companies. Professor’s were great from the very first day, and became our friends by the end of the program. All the books and materials used were in compliance with the international best practices and this opinion comes from a person who did his bachelor’s in California back in 2015. If you are seeking for a program that can challenge your professionalism do not hesitate to apply for this program or choose NU as your next place to start your studies.
Studying International Business we moved to a new building in my third year of University. The new building is amazing and has an encouraging atmosphere. I am constantly surrounded by different cultures and encouraged to meet new people. I was able to design my own learning path, choose topics I was interested in, and study abroad. The course could be a little more structured and I think the university could work on its communication sometimes, but overall I am really satisfied with my decision.
I liked the many workshop hours. Almost all classes had workshop hours and there the ideas and concepts discussed in the class were materialised and deemed practical and functional. O woukd recommended this university for the open minded you do not want limitations to what they can learn or how
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
