ESCI School of International Studies vs United International Business Schools - UIBS vs Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya - UPC vs INESDI Digital Business School - Barcelona vs Neuro Business School - NBS
Side-by-side comparison from 182 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Friendly, responsive, and qualified faculty
- +Engaging and enjoyable classes with up-to-date programs
- +Strong community and diverse, inclusive campus environment
- +Supportive and helpful faculty
- +Positive and enriching learning experience
- +Safe and well-equipped campus
- +Excellent teaching quality and helpful professors.
- +Vibrant campus life and diverse extracurricular activities.
- +Supportive environment with good student welfare and flexible academic options.
- +Knowledgeable and experienced professors with industry practice
- +Practical and hands-on learning approach
- +Personalized student attention and career development support
- +Practical, creative, and engaging learning approach
- +Inspiring and supportive teachers with real-world business insights
- +Strong academic programs with global perspectives
- +Flexible courses & supportive teachers
- +Career advancement & internship opportunities
- +Personal and professional growth
- +Welcoming and safe community
- +Excellent instructors and support
- +Relevant and up-to-date curriculum
- -Disorganized and unclear teaching with lack of individual attention.
- -Program or course content is not as advertised or challenging as expected.
- -Administrative and management issues within the school.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support frustrates students.
- -Excessive difficulty and perceived unfairness in grading contribute to student dissatisfaction.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources hinder the learning experience.
- -administrative & management issues
- -poor communication and transparency
- -difficulties with financial processes
- -Poor value for money regarding class hours.
- -Disappointing overall experience not meeting expectations.
- -Outdated course content and lack of practical training.
- -Poor communication and a feeling of being scammed.
- -Administrative and management issues.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
- -Lack of support and communication from instructors is disappointing.
This institution garners strong marks across most metrics. Professors and facilities stand out as particular strengths, both exceeding a 4.4 rating. Student life also scores well, alongside location and perceived value. The weakest area identified is internationality, scoring just above 4.0, with accommodation also receiving a lower, though still respectable, score of 4.2.
Academic and environmental aspects of the university are highly regarded, with professors and location both receiving a near-perfect score of 4.75. Student life is also a positive, scoring 4.25, and internationality and value are strong at 4.5. Facilities and accommodation present the weakest areas, both rated at 4.
Across a range of surveyed categories, this university demonstrates strong performance, particularly excelling in **Value** with a rating of 4.09. **Professors** also received a high mark at 3.97. Conversely, the **Location** and **Internationality** scores are relatively lower, both hovering around 3.75, indicating these areas might be considered for improvement. Overall, the institution maintains a solid standing in its facilities, student life, and accommodation.
Examining the provided ratings reveals a mixed picture. This institution excels in areas such as **professors**, achieving a strong 4 out of 5. It also demonstrates good standing in **internationality** and **value**, both scoring 3. Conversely, significant weaknesses are apparent with zero ratings for **facilities**, **location**, and **accommodation**. **Student life** received a low score of 1.
The institution demonstrates considerable strengths, particularly in its internationality, with a notable 4.79 rating. Professors also receive high marks at 4.74, and value for money is strong at 4.68. Areas for potential improvement include location and accommodation, both rated at 4.375, representing the lowest scores among the surveyed categories.
A review of this university reveals a mixed but generally positive assessment. Its strongest areas are Student Life and Internationality, both scoring around 3.67. Facilities, Location, and Accommodation received a solid 3, while Professors and Value landed slightly higher at approximately 3.33.
This institution receives particularly high marks for **Internationality** (4.92) and **Location** (4.83), indicating a vibrant global presence and desirable setting. **Facilities** and **Accomodation** also score very well at 4.5. **Value** is rated as the comparatively weakest area at 4.25, though still a respectable score. Professors and student life also maintain strong ratings.
With a 4.46/5 average, ~96% of reviews are positive, praising fun learning, qualified faculty, and community. A small ~4% of feedback notes disorganization and unclear expectations.
With an average rating of 4.5/5, ~75% of reviews are positive, highlighting a supportive learning environment and helpful, passionate faculty. One review mentioned slow administrative services.
Nearly all (99%) of the 94 reviews are positive, highlighting helpful teachers, good academic explanations, and excellent extracurricular activities. A small amount of feedback (1%) mentioned a perceived focus on difficulty over quality.
Reviews are predominantly positive (~75%), with students highlighting knowledgeable professors and a practical, in-depth curriculum. A smaller portion (~25%) reported issues with administrative processes.
Nearly all reviews are positive, highlighting engaging, creative learning with practical projects and inspiring teachers. A small percentage of feedback expressed dissatisfaction with the value of full-time programs.
With an average rating of 3.67/5 from 3 reviews, approximately 67% of feedback is positive, highlighting career advancement, internships, and effective teaching. About 33% of feedback expressed disappointment with communication and outdated course content.
University students give very positive reviews, with ~83% rating 4-5 stars. They praise welcoming culture, excellent instructors, and effective job placement support. No negative feedback was recorded.
ESCI es una escuela de negocios seria, donde existe un contacto cercano entre el alumno y el profesor. Disponen de una alta variedad de clases donde en algunos casos, si es cierto que necesitan terminar de pulir el temario para que resulte mas práctico y aplicable al ámbito laboral. Pero, en la mayoría de casos, ofrecen un temario exigente, riguroso, y una alta calidad de docencia. La escuela es pequeña, por lo que no siempre da la sensación de estar viviendo la experiencia universitaria, pero a la vez esto resulta en un muy agradable ambiente entre los estudiantes. Los puntos fuertes en mi opinión se resumen en: el programa de idiomas, el programa de prácticas, las buenas intalaciones y la gran valoración que tiene el título de negocios y marketing en el mercado.
Nothing to show
As a student of the UPC, it must be said that at the level of studies and teaching staff, both the one I have had as well as friends and acquaintances, is excellent. However, as far as facilities are concerned, it leaves much to be desired, and given the university's debt, small (and historical) faculties, such as the nautical one, are negatively affected by each management.
My experience with Inesdi, a business school in Barcelona, was deeply discouraging. After requesting a refund of 200 euros for an unused service, I found myself trapped in a cycle of procrastination and evasion by the admissions manager. What should have been a simple process turned into an ordeal lasting almost three months, with no guarantee of receiving my money back. The lack of transparency and professionalism on the part of Inesdi is worrying. Instead of addressing my request promptly, they seemed more interested in prolonging the process, apparently to avoid fulfilling their obligation to refund the money. After weeks of frustration and multiple contact attempts, I was abruptly informed that my application was no longer eligible, with no clear explanation. In short, my experience with Inesdi was a total disappointment. Your lack of integrity and respect for clients demonstrates a lack of commitment to basic ethical standards. I recommend those considering enrolling at Inesdi to think twice, as it seems that their priority is not providing quality education or satisfactory customer service, but simply money.
The classes are so intresting I love how they they teach you about psychology and business strategy, I really like how the teachers are real professionals in terms of marketing , buisness... overall I really enjoy it.
I genuinely wish I could leave a positive review about Hospitality Academy, but unfortunately, my experience has been incredibly disappointing and feels like a scam. They promised a hospitality certificate program with proper classes and training. I attended the first class, and after that—nothing. No follow-up, no new classes, and the content they provided was completely outdated, with videos from as far back as 2008. What’s worse is the complete lack of communication. I’ve reached out more than ten times via email and received no response. I also contacted my supposed advisor multiple times, and again—nothing. This level of unprofessionalism is unacceptable, especially from a company claiming to help professionals grow in the hospitality industry. I do not recommend this program to anyone. If you're serious about your education, go directly with accredited universities. It will save you time, money, and a lot of frustration.
Nothing to show
