La Salle U.R.L. vs Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya - UPC vs ESIC Business & Marketing School vs INESDI Digital Business School - Barcelona vs Neuro Business School - NBS

Side-by-side comparison from 173 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Neuro Business School - NBS (5.00)
La Salle U.R.L.: wins 0/6 categories
Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya - UPC: wins 0/6 categories
ESIC Business & Marketing School: wins 0/6 categories
INESDI Digital Business School - Barcelona: wins 0/6 categories
Neuro Business School - NBS: wins 6/6 categories
allWomen: wins 0/6 categories
Euroaula University School: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Barcelona, Spain
4.00
Read more reviews
6 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Management
Best programme: Aerospace Engineering
Best programme: Business Management and Marketing
Best programme: Digital Marketing
Best programme: BA in NeuroMarketing
Barcelona, Spain
4.20
Read more reviews
9 reviews
×
Best programme: Data Science
Best programme: Business Tourism and Events Management
Category ratings
Facilities
4.67
3.81
4.09
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.25
4.00
Location
5.00
3.77
4.00
Not rated
5.00
4.38
Not rated
Professors
3.33
4.01
3.82
4.00
5.00
Win
4.67
4.00
Internationality
4.00
3.79
3.64
3.00
5.00
Win
4.44
4.00
Student life
4.67
3.90
3.82
1.00
5.00
Win
4.22
Not rated
Value
4.00
4.12
3.64
3.00
5.00
Win
4.44
4.00
Accommodation
4.33
3.79
3.64
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.38
4.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +International environment and diverse cultures
  • +Engaging, proactive, and technology-focused learning methods
  • +Strong academic content and knowledgeable faculty
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
  • +Positive campus environment and social opportunities
  • +Strong academic and extracurricular offerings
  • +Practical learning, real-world projects, and industry connections.
  • +Excellent teaching quality and knowledgeable professors.
  • +Supportive campus environment and strong academic/personal guidance.
  • +Knowledgeable and experienced professors with industry practice
  • +Practical and hands-on learning approach
  • +Personalized student attention and career development support
  • +Integrated marketing, psychology, and neuroscience curriculum
  • +Expert instructors and supportive staff
  • +Practical application and industry connections
  • +Engaging and supportive instructors
  • +Practical and relevant course content
  • +Strong community and peer support
  • +Dedicated teaching staff and cutting-edge facilities
  • +All-embracing campus atmosphere
  • +Flexible housing options
Cons
  • -Outdated curriculum and outdated facilities.
  • -Administrative and management issues are prevalent.
  • -Lack of forward-thinking and innovative educational approach.
  • -Perceived focus on difficulty over quality and excessive failure rates.
  • -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources.
  • -Poor administrative support and unclear communication regarding academic systems.
  • -Lack of orientation and support for international students.
  • -Misleading information about course delivery methods.
  • -administrative & management issues
  • -poor communication and transparency
  • -difficulties with financial processes
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of essential resources are a recurring problem.
  • -Communication is often poor, leading to confusion and unmet expectations.
  • -Administrative & management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently criticized.
  • -Lack of effective communication and support is a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues frustrate students.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a concern.
  • -Limited academic support and unengaging teaching methods are disliked.
Rating summary
What students say

Outstanding scores are evident for this university's **Location** (5), **Facilities** (4.67), and **Student Life** (4.67). Conversely, the **Professors** category received the lowest rating at 3.33. Other areas like Accomodation (4.33), Internationality (4), and Value (4) are rated positively.

This university garners its highest marks in **Value**, indicating strong perceived return on investment. Conversely, **Facilities** received the lowest rating, suggesting an area for potential improvement. Other areas like Professors, Student Life, Accomodation, Internationality, and Location all fall within a generally positive range, reflecting a well-rounded student experience with specific opportunities for enhancement.

This institution demonstrates strong performance in its **facilities**, which received a high rating. Conversely, **accommodation**, **internationality**, and **value** represent areas that received comparatively lower scores. Other aspects like professors, location, and student life fall within a moderate range of satisfaction.

Examining the provided ratings reveals a mixed picture. This institution excels in areas such as **professors**, achieving a strong 4 out of 5. It also demonstrates good standing in **internationality** and **value**, both scoring 3. Conversely, significant weaknesses are apparent with zero ratings for **facilities**, **location**, and **accommodation**. **Student life** received a low score of 1.

Across all evaluated aspects, this institution demonstrates exceptional strength. It achieves a perfect score of 5 in every category, including Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value. This indicates a consistently outstanding experience for students in all surveyed areas, with no single category performing weaker than others.

With high marks across the board, this university excels in faculty expertise, earning a near-perfect 4.67. Its location and accommodation are also well-regarded at 4.38. Student life, though strong at 4.22, represents the lowest-rated category in this assessment. Internationality and value for money are notably strong, both receiving 4.44.

This institution garners excellent marks for its **Facilities**, **Professors**, **Accomodation**, **Internationality**, and **Value**, all receiving a solid 4 out of 5. Conversely, **Location** and **Student Life** received no rating, indicating these areas may require significant attention or were not assessed. The university appears to excel in its core offerings and student support infrastructure.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Nearly 83% of reviews are positive, highlighting internationality, relevant projects, and technology focus. One review (~17%) criticizes outdated architectural programs and facilities.

Most reviews are positive (~90%), highlighting good teachers and academic support, along with a positive campus environment and extracurricular activities. A small amount of feedback (~1%) noted concerns about academic difficulty.

With 4.13 stars from 55 reviews, ~85% of students praise the collaborative learning, practical projects with real companies, and good teaching quality. One review found the university experience poor.

Reviews are predominantly positive (~75%), with students highlighting knowledgeable professors and a practical, in-depth curriculum. A smaller portion (~25%) reported issues with administrative processes.

All 6 reviews were positive, giving an average of 5/5 stars. Students highlighted the program's blend of marketing, psychology, and neuroscience, and found classes engaging and practical. Professors were professional and supportive.

Reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~100% of feedback recommending the program. Students highlight great teachers, practical course content, and a supportive, diverse community as key strengths. There are no negative reviews.

The sole review is highly positive, rating 4/5 stars. This indicates strong satisfaction with dedicated teaching, modern facilities, campus atmosphere, and housing options. Approximately 100% of feedback is positive.

Rating distribution
5★
33%
16%
31%
25%
100%
56%
0%
4★
50%
72%
55%
50%
0%
11%
100%
3★
0%
11%
13%
0%
0%
33%
0%
2★
17%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
2%
25%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Opinion UPC (FNB)

As a student of the UPC, it must be said that at the level of studies and teaching staff, both the one I have had as well as friends and acquaintances, is excellent. However, as far as facilities are concerned, it leaves much to be desired, and given the university's debt, small (and historical) faculties, such as the nautical one, are negatively affected by each management.

Esic university Valencia is the worst university ever 😡

Worst university ever, I’m an İNTERNATİONAL student who came just for one semester for ERASMUS from another institution. It was the worst experience ever in my life, Esic university treated me so badly. The ERASMUS coordinator is really disrespectful and he didn’t even do a welcoming day for the new students. We didn’t get any training on how we can adapt to the university's system. First, they told us it is a hybrid system, which is not the case. This is the first lie from a higher education institution. They are really trying to push me to fail administration and also teachers I really feel it’s a religious problem about where I come from , plus I did all of my exams perfectly. Now I’m surprised that one teacher wants me to fail because I didn’t do one exercise ( just one in all semester lol) , my exam was perfect now she doesn’t want to show me my results and told me that she will make me fail because of one exercise. It is not fair and no one from the administration wants to help me as an Erasmus student, but I feel there is a difference between me and Spanish nationalities. Now I will take my legal right. They really discriminated against me in every way I’m really sad how I got used and treated this badly and also this issue has now become a personal issue, I really don’t recommend any İNTERNATİONAL students to join ESIC Valencia it’s the worst university on planet earth 😡

Poor Business Ethics

My experience with Inesdi, a business school in Barcelona, was deeply discouraging. After requesting a refund of 200 euros for an unused service, I found myself trapped in a cycle of procrastination and evasion by the admissions manager. What should have been a simple process turned into an ordeal lasting almost three months, with no guarantee of receiving my money back. The lack of transparency and professionalism on the part of Inesdi is worrying. Instead of addressing my request promptly, they seemed more interested in prolonging the process, apparently to avoid fulfilling their obligation to refund the money. After weeks of frustration and multiple contact attempts, I was abruptly informed that my application was no longer eligible, with no clear explanation. In short, my experience with Inesdi was a total disappointment. Your lack of integrity and respect for clients demonstrates a lack of commitment to basic ethical standards. I recommend those considering enrolling at Inesdi to think twice, as it seems that their priority is not providing quality education or satisfactory customer service, but simply money.

The attitude and the atmosphere

The classes are so intresting I love how they they teach you about psychology and business strategy, I really like how the teachers are real professionals in terms of marketing , buisness... overall I really enjoy it.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close