United International Business Schools - UIBS vs Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona - UAB vs Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya - UPC vs Universitat Pompeu Fabra - UPF vs Neuro Business School - NBS
Side-by-side comparison from 446 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive and helpful faculty
- +Positive and enriching learning experience
- +Safe and well-equipped campus
- +Excellent academic quality and specialized instructors
- +Supportive professors and positive campus environment
- +Valuable resources and opportunities for personal/professional growth
- +Excellent teaching quality and helpful professors.
- +Vibrant campus life and diverse extracurricular activities.
- +Supportive environment with good student welfare and flexible academic options.
- +Knowledgeable professors and strong academic programs.
- +Well-organized university with impressive infrastructure.
- +International atmosphere and attractive location.
- +Practical, creative, and engaging learning approach
- +Inspiring and supportive teachers with real-world business insights
- +Strong academic programs with global perspectives
- +Flexible courses & supportive teachers
- +Career advancement & internship opportunities
- +Personal and professional growth
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support frustrates students.
- -Poor teaching quality and unsupportive faculty are a major concern.
- -Substandard facilities, including moldy housing and unreliable WiFi, detract from the student experience.
- -Lack of clear academic feedback and excessive class cancellations hinder learning.
- -Excessive difficulty and perceived unfairness in grading contribute to student dissatisfaction.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Administrative & management issues cause frustration and slow responses.
- -Inconsistent student backgrounds lower the academic level of discussions.
- -Professors sometimes design classes to be less demanding due to diverse student levels.
- -Poor value for money regarding class hours.
- -Disappointing overall experience not meeting expectations.
- -Outdated course content and lack of practical training.
- -Poor communication and a feeling of being scammed.
- -Administrative and management issues.
Nothing to show
Academic and environmental aspects of the university are highly regarded, with professors and location both receiving a near-perfect score of 4.75. Student life is also a positive, scoring 4.25, and internationality and value are strong at 4.5. Facilities and accommodation present the weakest areas, both rated at 4.
A well-rounded university experience is reflected in these ratings. Student Life stands out as the strongest area, receiving the highest score. Among the areas with slightly lower scores, Accommodation is rated the weakest, though still well within a positive range. Other categories like Facilities, Professors, Location, Internationality, and Value all received solid marks, indicating a generally positive perception of the university.
Across a range of surveyed categories, this university demonstrates strong performance, particularly excelling in **Value** with a rating of 4.09. **Professors** also received a high mark at 3.97. Conversely, the **Location** and **Internationality** scores are relatively lower, both hovering around 3.75, indicating these areas might be considered for improvement. Overall, the institution maintains a solid standing in its facilities, student life, and accommodation.
**The university** receives excellent marks for its **Location**, which stands out as its strongest attribute. **Value** and **Facilities** also score well, indicating positive student perceptions in these areas. Areas for potential improvement include **Accomodation** and **Internationality**, which received the lowest ratings. **Professors** and **Student Life** fall in the mid-range, suggesting generally positive but not exceptional experiences.
The institution demonstrates considerable strengths, particularly in its internationality, with a notable 4.79 rating. Professors also receive high marks at 4.74, and value for money is strong at 4.68. Areas for potential improvement include location and accommodation, both rated at 4.375, representing the lowest scores among the surveyed categories.
A review of this university reveals a mixed but generally positive assessment. Its strongest areas are Student Life and Internationality, both scoring around 3.67. Facilities, Location, and Accommodation received a solid 3, while Professors and Value landed slightly higher at approximately 3.33.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4.5/5, ~75% of reviews are positive, highlighting a supportive learning environment and helpful, passionate faculty. One review mentioned slow administrative services.
Approximately 95.5% of reviews are positive, highlighting good academic reputation, supportive professors, and positive campus environments. A small percentage of feedback notes issues with teaching quality and facilities.
Nearly all (99%) of the 94 reviews are positive, highlighting helpful teachers, good academic explanations, and excellent extracurricular activities. A small amount of feedback (1%) mentioned a perceived focus on difficulty over quality.
With an average rating of 4.23/5 from 126 reviews, ~87% are positive, praising knowledgeable professors, strong academics, and an international atmosphere. Just ~1.6% of reviews are negative, citing administrative inefficiency and varying academic levels.
Nearly all reviews are positive, highlighting engaging, creative learning with practical projects and inspiring teachers. A small percentage of feedback expressed dissatisfaction with the value of full-time programs.
With an average rating of 3.67/5 from 3 reviews, approximately 67% of feedback is positive, highlighting career advancement, internships, and effective teaching. About 33% of feedback expressed disappointment with communication and outdated course content.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I studied tourism at UAB for one semester in 2022. I was supposed to stay for a full year, but my experience wasn't good and I left after the first semester. First of all, the housing area (Villa universitária) has mold. I was sick constantly during my exhange and went through multiple respiratory infections. I also had almost daily headaches and a very painful and strong cough. All of this eased after a couple weeks once I returned to my home country. Other exhange students told me about having the same issues and some noticed mold in their apartment walls. The housing area at times is very unsave and not controlled properly. The tourism faculty is located in the same building with the housing area reception. Therefore, it was very excluded from the rest of the campus. That's why, I didn't really get to use any of the services offered at the campus or get a real university experience. UAB also has a medical centre for "all students" according to their website, yet this doesn't include tourism students. I was turned away from the centre despite being extremely sick once they heard I study tourism at the school. The classes focused more on remembering as much information as you can to pass the exam, rather than focusing on understanding, critical thinking etc. The teachers were very often late to classes, they felt very unmotivated and I received very little feedback. In short, I do not recommend UAB. My experience was a loss of money and time.
As a student of the UPC, it must be said that at the level of studies and teaching staff, both the one I have had as well as friends and acquaintances, is excellent. However, as far as facilities are concerned, it leaves much to be desired, and given the university's debt, small (and historical) faculties, such as the nautical one, are negatively affected by each management.
My journey at Pompeu Fabra has been nothing short of inspiring. The university's emphasis on research and real-world application ignited a fire within me to explore my field in depth. My professors were more than just educators; they were passionate mentors who challenged me to think critically and independently. The vibrant energy of Barcelona, combined with the university's international focus, created an environment where I felt both stimulated and supported. UPF has equipped me with a robust skill set and a global perspective, preparing me to make a meaningful impact on the world.
The classes are so intresting I love how they they teach you about psychology and business strategy, I really like how the teachers are real professionals in terms of marketing , buisness... overall I really enjoy it.
I genuinely wish I could leave a positive review about Hospitality Academy, but unfortunately, my experience has been incredibly disappointing and feels like a scam. They promised a hospitality certificate program with proper classes and training. I attended the first class, and after that—nothing. No follow-up, no new classes, and the content they provided was completely outdated, with videos from as far back as 2008. What’s worse is the complete lack of communication. I’ve reached out more than ten times via email and received no response. I also contacted my supposed advisor multiple times, and again—nothing. This level of unprofessionalism is unacceptable, especially from a company claiming to help professionals grow in the hospitality industry. I do not recommend this program to anyone. If you're serious about your education, go directly with accredited universities. It will save you time, money, and a lot of frustration.
Nothing to show
