Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv vs National Pedagogical Dragomanov University vs Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman vs National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine vs MIM Kyiv Business School - MIM
Side-by-side comparison from 30 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Excellent teaching and encouraging professors
- +Diverse opportunities and engaging student life
- +Strong academic reputation and well-organized programs
- +Positive atmosphere and friendly teachers
- +Beautiful and quiet campus
- +Supportive and manageable academic environment
- +Strong academic programs and supportive faculty.
- +Positive student atmosphere and community.
- +Opportunities for practical experience and international exchange.
- +Welcoming and inclusive environment
- +Positive learning atmosphere
- +Well-maintained campus
- +Comprehensive business understanding and accessible teaching
- +Experiential learning, mentorship, and community events
- +Real-world application and career preparation
- +Expert instructors and engaging teaching methods.
- +Relevant and practical curriculum with up-to-date content.
- +Supportive learning environment and strong career services.
- +Affordable quality education
- +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
- +Practical, well-structured curriculum
- -Poor teaching quality and unfair assessment practices.
- -Dissatisfaction with the university system and overall experience.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are common complaints.
- -Course content is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly delivered.
- -Pervasive corruption and a focus on extracting money.
- -Inadequate and unengaging teaching from unmotivated lecturers.
- -Wasted time with little real value gained.
- -Administrative & management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is frequently mentioned.
- -Poor administrative support and unclear communication are frequent complaints.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are significant drawbacks.
- -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or lacking practical application.
- -Excessive workload and focus on written assignments over practical skills.
- -Ineffective and demanding remote learning practices.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a persistent problem.
- -Inconsistent and unhelpful administrative support creates frustration.
- -Lack of clear communication regarding policies and opportunities is common.
This institution scores exceptionally well for **Value**, its highest-rated aspect. **Location** and **Student Life** also received strong marks. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerged as the weakest area, with a comparatively lower rating. Other categories like **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Internationality** fall in the mid-range, indicating areas for potential improvement alongside its strengths.
This university exhibits a uniformly unimpressive profile, with zero ratings across all evaluated aspects. Consequently, no specific areas stand out as either strong or weak. The institution scores equally low in facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and perceived value, suggesting a pervasive need for improvement in all these domains.
This institution demonstrates particular strengths in **Student Life**, receiving a high rating of 4.5. **Location** and **Professors** are also well-regarded, both scoring 4. **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 2.5. **Facilities**, **Internationality**, and **Value** fall within the mid-range of scores.
This institution shines brightly in several key areas, achieving perfect scores for its professors and student life, along with excellent value. Facilities and accommodation also receive strong marks. A notable weakness, however, is its location, which received a zero rating. Internationality is also rated well, indicating a globally aware environment.
This institution receives high marks across most categories, with Facilities standing out as its strongest area at a perfect 5. Student Life, Accomodation, Internationality, and Value are also exceptionally strong, each scoring 4.67. Professors represent the weakest area, though still solid at 4.33, with Location also performing well at 4.5.
This institution demonstrates a strong showing in its location, which received the highest rating. Conversely, its facilities are the weakest point, scoring significantly lower than other aspects. Student life and value also received favorable marks, while professors, accommodation, and internationality fall in the middle range.
This institution garners exceptional ratings across most categories, with perfect scores awarded for both **Location** and **Accomodation**. **Facilities**, **Student Life**, **Internationality**, and **Value** also received outstanding marks. The **Professors** area, while still strong, is the relatively weakest point at a solid 4 out of 5.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong academic traditions and supportive teachers. A small percentage of feedback notes dissatisfaction with the system or specific instructors.
With a perfect 5/5 average rating from one review, the university is described as beautiful, quiet, and having a fine atmosphere. Students found exams easy, teachers lighthearted, and facilities bright.
With an average rating of 3.25/5, feedback is split evenly between positive and negative. Students praised good staff and interesting programs, while others cited corruption and unengaging teaching.
With a perfect 5/5 average rating, this university garners overwhelmingly positive feedback. The single review highlights its welcoming atmosphere, neat campus, and calming environment conducive to learning.
Students highly praise the comprehensive curriculum and excellent teaching staff, finding instruction accessible and engaging. Experiential learning opportunities and supportive faculty are frequently highlighted. No negative feedback was provided.
With an average rating of 2/5, two out of three reviews are negative (~67%). Students report excessive assignments and a focus on online tasks over practical learning.
With an average rating of 4.5/5, all feedback is positive. Reviews highlight affordable education and a solid curriculum with a good balance of theory and practical experience. Faculty are described as knowledgeable and supportive.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
A certain hierarchy reigns in the university in which professors and the dean’s office are considered gods, and students and laboratory assistants are secondary characters. Despite this, there are people that ready to teach and help you I consider the opportunity to become more independent as a plus in NMU. Many faculties and campuses can also be attributed to the merits of university. The complexity of learning unites students so that you can turn a blind eye to shortcomings…
Kyiv Medical University offers a solid educational foundation for aspiring healthcare professionals. The faculty is knowledgeable and supportive, providing valuable insights and guidance throughout the program. The curriculum is well-structured, combining theoretical knowledge with practical experience, which is essential for our future careers. Opinion: Overall, my experience at Kyiv Medical University has been positive. I appreciate the emphasis on hands-on training and the opportunities to interact with patients early in our studies. The campus environment is vibrant and fosters a sense of community among students. However, I feel that there could be improvements in certain administrative processes, which can sometimes be slow and cumbersome. Recommendation: I would recommend Kyiv Medical University to those looking to pursue a medical career, as it equips students with the necessary skills and knowledge. The supportive atmosphere and strong academic foundation make it a worthwhile choice for anyone passionate about healthcare.