Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv vs National Aviation University vs National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine vs National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy vs MIM Kyiv Business School - MIM

Side-by-side comparison from 24 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv: wins 0/3 categories
National Aviation University: wins 0/3 categories
National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine: wins 0/3 categories
National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy: wins 0/3 categories
MIM Kyiv Business School - MIM: wins 0/3 categories
GoIT Neoversity: wins 0/3 categories
International University of Finance - IUF: wins 3/3 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Political Science
Best programme: Biology and Wildlife
Best programme: Economics
Best programme: MBA
Kiev, Ukraine
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting and Finance
Category ratings
Facilities
3.78
2.00
4.00
4.30
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Location
4.11
3.00
Not rated
4.50
4.50
Not rated
5.00
Win
Professors
3.89
2.00
5.00
3.70
4.33
Not rated
5.00
Internationality
3.67
2.00
4.00
3.00
4.67
Not rated
5.00
Win
Student life
4.00
2.00
5.00
4.60
4.67
Not rated
5.00
Value
4.33
2.00
5.00
5.00
4.67
Not rated
5.00
Accommodation
3.33
1.00
4.00
3.00
4.67
Not rated
5.00
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Excellent teaching and encouraging professors
  • +Diverse opportunities and engaging student life
  • +Strong academic reputation and well-organized programs
  • +Excellent faculty and engaging teaching methods
  • +Valuable practical experience and career preparation
  • +Supportive learning environment and strong community
  • +Welcoming and inclusive environment
  • +Positive learning atmosphere
  • +Well-maintained campus
  • +High academic standards and international focus
  • +Opportunities for practical learning and creativity
  • +Strong reputation and European standards
  • +Comprehensive business understanding and accessible teaching
  • +Experiential learning, mentorship, and community events
  • +Real-world application and career preparation

Nothing to show

  • +Strong campus atmosphere and good friendships
  • +Nice and approachable teachers
Cons
  • -Poor teaching quality and unfair assessment practices.
  • -Dissatisfaction with the university system and overall experience.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment.
  • -Poor English proficiency among professors.
  • -Administrative & management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is frequently mentioned.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are major concerns.
  • -Unresponsive and unhelpful support staff are a recurring complaint.
  • -Poor administrative support and unclear communication are frequent complaints.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are significant drawbacks.
  • -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or lacking practical application.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are consistently frustrating.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of communication and support from staff is a major concern.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution scores exceptionally well for **Value**, its highest-rated aspect. **Location** and **Student Life** also received strong marks. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerged as the weakest area, with a comparatively lower rating. Other categories like **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Internationality** fall in the mid-range, indicating areas for potential improvement alongside its strengths.

This institution's ratings present a mixed picture. Its strongest points are location, earning a respectable 3, suggesting good accessibility and surroundings. However, areas such as accommodation, professors, facilities, student life, and internationality all received a 2, indicating a need for significant improvement in these crucial aspects of the student experience. The value also received a 2, reflecting concerns about the return on investment.

This institution shines brightly in several key areas, achieving perfect scores for its professors and student life, along with excellent value. Facilities and accommodation also receive strong marks. A notable weakness, however, is its location, which received a zero rating. Internationality is also rated well, indicating a globally aware environment.

This institution excels particularly in areas like Student Life (4.6), Location (4.5), and Facilities (4.3), indicating a vibrant and well-situated campus environment. Conversely, Accomodation and Internationality received the lowest scores, both at 3. Despite these areas, Value stands out with a perfect 5, suggesting a strong return on investment. Professor ratings are a moderate 3.7.

This institution receives high marks across most categories, with Facilities standing out as its strongest area at a perfect 5. Student Life, Accomodation, Internationality, and Value are also exceptionally strong, each scoring 4.67. Professors represent the weakest area, though still solid at 4.33, with Location also performing well at 4.5.

Nothing to show

Consistently scoring a perfect 5 across all metrics, this institution demonstrates exceptional strength in every surveyed area. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value are all rated outstandingly. There are no discernible weak areas, as the university achieves top marks uniformly. This indicates a uniformly excellent and well-rounded educational experience.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong academic traditions and supportive teachers. A small percentage of feedback notes dissatisfaction with the system or specific instructors.

The single review indicates a highly negative experience. The reviewer cited old equipment not meeting program needs and professors with poor English proficiency, even in an English-taught program. This represented ~100% of feedback, resulting in a 1/5 average rating.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, this university garners overwhelmingly positive feedback. The single review highlights its welcoming atmosphere, neat campus, and calming environment conducive to learning.

With an average rating of 4.5/5, 100% of feedback is positive. Students praise educational quality, practical lessons, encouraged critical thinking, and opportunities for creativity.

Students highly praise the comprehensive curriculum and excellent teaching staff, finding instruction accessible and engaging. Experiential learning opportunities and supportive faculty are frequently highlighted. No negative feedback was provided.

Nothing to show

The single review is highly positive, rating the university 5/5. The student enjoyed the atmosphere and appreciated the nice teachers, strongly recommending it.

Rating distribution
5★
50%
0%
100%
50%
67%
0%
100%
4★
31%
0%
0%
50%
33%
0%
0%
3★
6%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
13%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close