Université Lumière Lyon 2 - L2 vs emlyon business school vs Burgundy School of Business vs IAE Lyon School of Management vs ESSCA School of Management
Side-by-side comparison from 96 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Quality teaching and internationally recognized educators
- +Accessible campus locations and good public transport
- +Opportunities for idea exchange and interactive learning
- +Practical and international programs with diverse students
- +Valuable professional experience through internships and work-study
- +Supportive environment for personal and professional development
- +Experienced and approachable instructors
- +Practical, relevant curriculum
- +Supportive environment and good location
- +Small class sizes and ideal study conditions
- +Diverse guest speakers from academic and entrepreneurial backgrounds
- +Focus on innovative learning and support for student initiatives
- +High-quality education with specialization options and practical experience
- +Vibrant campus life and strong community with supportive peers and professors
- +Excellent career preparation through industry connections and internships
- +Approachable and supportive professors
- +Practical learning and real-world experience
- +International environment and personal development
Nothing to show
- -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently mentioned.
- -Students express dissatisfaction with curriculum and teaching quality.
- -Lack of practical value and shallow content in courses.
- -Unfair and frustrating grading, especially for group projects.
- -Disappointing professor engagement and program support.
- -Administrative and management issues hinder program quality.
- -Program value is not commensurate with the high tuition fees.
- -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources.
- -Poor communication and administrative inefficiencies.
- -Lack of support and irrelevant course content.
- -Unprepared and unhelpful professors with poor English communication.
- -Poor organization and irrelevant, expensive courses.
- -Lack of student engagement and focus on partying.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -A lack of communication and support from the institution is prevalent.
Nothing to show
This university exhibits a varied performance across key aspects. Its strongest areas are **Student Life (4.3)** and **Location (4.18)**, indicating a vibrant campus experience and desirable setting. Conversely, **Accomodation (2.58)** and **Facilities (2.9)** received the lowest scores, suggesting potential room for improvement in these practical resources. Other categories like Professors, Internationality, and Value fall within a moderate to good range.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strength in its internationality and location, both scoring above 4.5. Student life and value also received positive marks, exceeding 4.2 and 4.4 respectively. However, accommodation presents as the weakest area, with the lowest rating of approximately 3.94. Facilities and professors also received solid, though slightly lower, scores in comparison.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in several key areas, with location receiving the highest marks at 4.44. Professors and student life also scored very well, both at 4.22. Conversely, accommodation and facilities represent the weakest aspects, with scores of 3.56 and 3.63 respectively. The university shows a moderate performance in internationality and value.
This institution demonstrates significant strengths in its **Location**, achieving a perfect score, and a strong showing in **Student Life** with a 4. Its **Facilities** and **Professors** are rated moderately at 3.5. However, **Accomodation** and **Internationality** received the lowest scores, both at 3. Despite these areas for improvement, the university offers good **Value** at 4.
Among the evaluated aspects, the university excels in its **Location**, receiving a high rating of 4.32, and **Student Life**, with a score of 4.22. **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, scoring 3.46. Other categories like Facilities, Professors, Internationality, and Value are all rated favorably, generally falling between 3.8 and 3.96, indicating a well-rounded experience with room for improvement in housing.
Receiving perfect scores across the board, this institution excels in all evaluated aspects. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value are all rated as outstanding. With a consistent five-star performance across every category, there are no discernible weak areas to highlight. The university demonstrates a uniformly strong offering.
Nothing to show
With a 3.67 average rating, approximately 50% of reviews are positive, highlighting helpful teachers and interactive classes. Some reviews mention administrative and management inefficiency, with a desire for improved CROUS catering.
The vast majority of university students have a positive experience, highlighting academic rigor, practical learning, and international environments. A small fraction of reviews mention disappointment with course content and grading.
The majority of reviews (~89%) are positive, highlighting knowledgeable professors, practical courses, and a supportive environment. A small amount of negative feedback (~11%) exists, with one reviewer feeling the cost was not justified.
With an average rating of 4/5, student feedback is largely positive. Reviews highlight ideal study conditions, particularly within master programs, and a strong focus on entrepreneurial initiatives.
Most reviews (~74%) praise the quality of education, practical experience, and vibrant campus life. A small percentage (8.3%) mention unprepared professors and organizational issues.
Both reviews are overwhelmingly positive, rating the university 5/5. Students praise the program's fulfillment of expectations, approachable professors, practical learning, and strong industry connections. The international environment and focus on personal development are also highlighted.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
As an international student attending the MBA WINE AND SPIRITS BUSINESS program and spending 32 thousand euros (besides the need of quitting my job, move, find an accommodation and change lifestyle) I would say that the school is worth less then half of what it costs. The only good aspects of it are the big students’ communities, the commitment of the international office and the quality of some teachers who cannot really give their best because they’re hampered by the strict organisation of the school programs. Administration, services and the overall school organisation are really below expectations and the educational level is just average despite the cost and the “reputation”. Everyone (classmates, other international students and french ones from all courses and years) complained about the fact that “the school used to be a good one, but now is just bad”!
Nothing to show
Overall, I had a positive experience at ESSCA. The programme is well organized and provides a solid foundation in business and management. The courses were generally of good quality and covered a broad range of topics, helping students develop both academic knowledge and practical skills. One of the aspects I appreciated most was the international exchange during the third year. ESSCA has a good network of partner universities, and the opportunity to study abroad was a valuable part of the programme. Student life is also a real strength of the school. The associative environment is active and offers many opportunities to get involved outside the classroom, meet new people, and gain additional experience. Like any programme, some courses were more engaging than others, but overall I found the experience enriching and would recommend it to students looking for a business school with a strong international dimension and a good balance between academics and extracurricular activities.
I am a Chinese student and I completed my MBA in Business Engineering at IDRAC Business School and the experience has been excellent. The program fully met my expectations. The professors are very approachable, supportive, and always available. I truly appreciated the strong sense of guidance and personal support throughout the course. Highly recommended!
Nothing to show
