EU Business School vs United International Business Schools - UIBS vs University of Geneva - UNIGE vs Institut Avrio de Geneve vs Rushford Business School

Side-by-side comparison from 282 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Rushford Business School (4.80)
EU Business School: wins 0/7 categories
United International Business Schools - UIBS: wins 1/7 categories
University of Geneva - UNIGE: wins 0/7 categories
Institut Avrio de Geneve: wins 0/7 categories
Rushford Business School: wins 5/7 categories
International Institute in Geneva: wins 1/7 categories
Geneva School of Diplomacy - GSD: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Barcelona, Spain
3.90
Read more reviews
245 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: Accounting and Management Information Systems
Best programme: Economics and Business
Geneva, Switzerland
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Geneva, Switzerland
4.80
Top
Read more reviews
20 reviews
×
Best programme: MBA
Best programme: International Relations
Category ratings
Facilities
4.02
4.00
4.22
Not rated
5.00
Win
3.00
2.00
Location
4.72
4.75
Win
4.20
Not rated
4.74
3.00
2.67
Professors
4.02
4.75
4.44
Not rated
4.90
Win
4.00
3.33
Internationality
4.72
4.50
4.78
Not rated
4.85
5.00
Win
4.67
Student life
4.20
4.25
4.11
Not rated
4.40
Win
4.00
2.33
Value
3.85
4.50
4.78
Not rated
4.80
Win
3.00
2.00
Accommodation
3.37
4.00
4.25
Not rated
4.74
Win
4.00
2.50
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Supportive and approachable staff and faculty
  • +Practical, interactive learning with strong career focus
  • +Welcoming community and international environment
  • +Supportive and helpful faculty
  • +Positive and enriching learning experience
  • +Safe and well-equipped campus
  • +Multicultural environment and diverse colleagues
  • +High-quality faculty with industry experience and strong academic reputation
  • +Practical career preparation and enhanced job opportunities

Nothing to show

  • +Flexible study schedules and diverse themes
  • +High-quality faculty with global perspectives
  • +Relevant MBA programs for career advancement

Nothing to show

  • +Experienced and accessible professors from diverse backgrounds.
  • +Extensive industry connections and career opportunities.
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause disorganization.
  • -Educational quality is perceived as basic and lacking proper support.
  • -Facilities and extracurriculars are underdeveloped and not prioritized.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support frustrates students.
  • -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
  • -Poorly maintained and outdated facilities are a common complaint.
  • -Many students feel there is a lack of career support and networking opportunities.

Nothing to show

  • -Lack of promised support and opportunities.
  • -Poor post-enrollment communication.

Nothing to show

  • -Overpriced and low value for money.
  • -Unqualified or unmotivated professors.
  • -Unreliable administration and accreditation issues.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates significant strengths in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring an impressive 4.7. Student life is also highly regarded at 4.2. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the weakest area, with a rating of 3.4. Other aspects like Facilities, Professors, and Value fall within a moderate to good range, generally above 3.8.

Academic and environmental aspects of the university are highly regarded, with professors and location both receiving a near-perfect score of 4.75. Student life is also a positive, scoring 4.25, and internationality and value are strong at 4.5. Facilities and accommodation present the weakest areas, both rated at 4.

An analysis of university ratings reveals a strong international focus and exceptional value, both scoring very high. The institution also excels in the quality of its professors. Among the surveyed aspects, student life received the lowest, though still positive, rating. Facilities and accommodation were also rated favorably, indicating a well-rounded student experience.

Nothing to show

This institution receives excellent marks, with its **Facilities** standing out as the strongest area, earning a perfect 5. **Professors** also garner high praise at 4.9. **Student Life**, while still strong, is the relatively weakest aspect with a score of 4.4. The university demonstrates a solid all-around performance with high ratings in location, accommodation, internationality, and value.

Nothing to show

This institution excels in internationality, receiving a score of 4.67. Conversely, its facilities and value for money are areas needing improvement, both scoring a low 2. Professors, location, and student life fall into the mid-range, with accommodation also receiving a moderate rating.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting career services, supportive staff, and an international environment. About 7.4% are negative, citing disorganization and basic education.

With an average rating of 4.5/5, ~75% of reviews are positive, highlighting a supportive learning environment and helpful, passionate faculty. One review mentioned slow administrative services.

All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.56/5. Students highlight multicultural environments, well-organized programs, and knowledgeable professors who are experts in their fields. The curriculum prepares students well for the job market.

Nothing to show

Nearly all reviews are positive, praising program flexibility, diverse themes, and supportive faculty. A small percentage of feedback mentions unfulfilled promises and poor communication.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 2/5, approximately 67% of reviews are negative. While one positive review highlights great professors and networking opportunities, negative feedback focuses on the program being overpriced and underdelivered, with unaccredited degrees and issues with transcripts.

Rating distribution
5★
26%
75%
56%
0%
90%
0%
0%
4★
45%
0%
44%
0%
5%
0%
33%
3★
21%
25%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
2★
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
4%
0%
0%
0%
5%
0%
67%
Most useful review
Most liked
Student-Staff relationship

As far as universities go I think EU business school comes first in terms of student-staff relationship. Every member of the staff I have encountered has been more than helpful. What i think should improve as even tho its not connected to my previous point is I think the school should have more leniency towards tuition payment specially to international students because we are here despite the challenges of having to find willing banks to exchange local currencies to Euros.

Nothing to show

Challenging but worth it

It is true that a diploma from a Swiss university isn't easy to get, but it is totally profitable. First, this program gives us opportunities to meet prestigious Swiss businessmen and businesswomen. Plus our professors are well-known and are the best in their domain. With a diploma from UNIGE, we have a career assured, especially if we want to work in Switzerland (one of the countries with the highest wages), but also internationally. Our university is located in the international city of Geneva, we can enjoy the little but pleasant student life with students from all around the world.

Nothing to show

Experience with Rushford business school

I regret choosing Rushford Business School for my MBA. Despite detailed discussions and assurances from its president, Syed Tufail, none of the promised support or opportunities were delivered. Communication after enrollment was extremely poor, and the overall experience did not meet expectations. Sharing this to help others make informed decisions.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close