Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań - UAM vs American Graduate School in Paris vs Notre Dame College vs University of Iceland - HÍ vs Reykjavik University - RU

Side-by-side comparison from 121 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań - UAM: wins 0/7 categories
American Graduate School in Paris: wins 0/7 categories
Notre Dame College: wins 3/7 categories
University of Iceland - HÍ: wins 0/7 categories
Reykjavik University - RU: wins 0/7 categories
British University Vietnam - BUV: wins 3/7 categories
University of Zagreb Faculty of Pharmacy and Biochemistry - FBF: wins 1/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Business Administration and Management and Law
South Euclid, Ohio, United States
4.50
Read more reviews
4 reviews
×
Best programme: Architecture
Best programme: Communication and Public Relations
Reykjavik, Iceland
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: BSc Computer Science (awarded by University of Staffordshire)
Best programme: Pharmaceutical-Biochemical Sciences - PhD
Category ratings
Facilities
4.31
Not rated
4.25
3.50
Not rated
4.69
Win
3.00
Location
4.42
Not rated
4.75
Win
4.00
Not rated
4.20
4.00
Professors
4.22
Not rated
4.50
4.00
Not rated
4.55
Win
4.00
Internationality
4.05
Not rated
4.75
Win
4.50
Not rated
4.07
3.00
Student life
4.22
Not rated
4.75
Win
3.50
Not rated
4.40
4.00
Value
4.03
Not rated
4.75
3.50
Not rated
4.48
5.00
Win
Accommodation
4.11
Not rated
4.25
4.00
Not rated
4.33
Win
4.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Knowledgeable and supportive professors
  • +Beautiful campus and vibrant student life
  • +Inclusive and diverse academic environment

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive and dedicated teachers/staff
  • +Welcoming and friendly community/atmosphere
  • +Academic and personal growth opportunities
  • +Strong practical and hands-on learning experiences.
  • +High quality of higher education.

Nothing to show

  • +Modern campus & supportive international environment
  • +Qualified & passionate faculty
  • +Affordable British-standard education
  • +Strong scientific foundations and practical learning
  • +Supportive environment with approachable professors and well-equipped labs
  • +Opportunities for personal and professional development through student associations
Cons
  • -Unresponsive and inexperienced program coordination.
  • -Limited and outdated curriculum offerings.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
  • -Lack of necessary resources and equipment hinders learning.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently criticized.
  • -Communication and transparency from the institution are lacking.

Nothing to show

  • -Lack of professor support and engagement with student curiosity.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause confusion and frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning and comfort.
  • -Lack of engaging teaching methods and course relevance leads to boredom.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates a strong showing across key areas, with Location receiving the highest score. Facilities and Professors also earned favorable marks. Student Life and Accommodation are well-regarded. Among the evaluated aspects, Internationality and Value received the lowest, though still respectable, ratings.

Nothing to show

This institution garners excellent marks in nearly all assessed aspects, particularly excelling in Location, Student Life, Internationality, and Value, all receiving a high 4.75. While still strong, the Facilities and Accommodation areas are the relatively weakest, both rated at 4.25. Professors also received a very favorable rating of 4.5.

This institution demonstrates particular strength in its **Internationality**, receiving a high rating of 4.5. Other well-regarded aspects include **Professors**, **Location**, and **Accomodation**, all scoring a solid 4. Conversely, **Facilities** and **Student Life** are areas with the lowest scores, both at 3.5, suggesting room for improvement in these domains.

Nothing to show

This institution excels in its facilities, earning a near-perfect score. Professors also receive commendation for their quality. Areas for potential improvement include internationality, which scored the lowest among the surveyed aspects. Student life, accommodation, and value all demonstrate solid, above-average performance, alongside a respectable location rating.

Overall, this institution demonstrates a strong offering, particularly excelling in **Value**, where it achieved a perfect score. Professors, Location, Student Life, and Accommodation all received commendable ratings of 4. The weakest areas identified were Facilities and Internationality, both scoring a 3.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.07/5 from 70 reviews, approximately 83% of feedback is positive, highlighting world-class professors, a beautiful campus, and an amazing student life. A small amount of negative feedback (~2.9%) pointed to specific program coordination issues.

Nothing to show

All four reviews are highly positive (100%), with students praising the outstanding campus environment and supportive, helpful teachers. No negative feedback was reported.

With an average rating of 4/5, reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight practical work and the university's quality. A minor concern involves mandatory Icelandic subjects in some specializations.

Nothing to show

With 4.45 stars from 42 reviews, most students praise the modern campus, supportive, qualified international faculty, and friendly, diverse student body. One review cited a lack of in-depth professor support.

Students highly praise the faculty, highlighting valuable professional and personal experiences (~100% positive). Recurring themes include strong scientific foundations, practical work, approachable professors, and supportive community.

Rating distribution
5★
27%
0%
50%
0%
0%
57%
33%
4★
56%
0%
50%
100%
0%
33%
67%
3★
14%
0%
0%
0%
0%
7%
0%
2★
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
My opinion about Adam Mickiewicz University

In my opinion, Adam Mickiewicz University is a very solid institution, especially if you are interested in humanities, social sciences, or academic research. It has a good reputation, strong research facilities, and international connections, which provide significant opportunities for academic development. As for the drawbacks — the biggest challenges may be bureaucracy and administrative procedures, as well as the cost of accommodation, especially for international students. Therefore, it is worth carefully analyzing the faculties, the programme, and the housing options before starting your studies.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

BUV - The Engagement Hub

As a Chinese international student at BUV, I’ve had a wonderful experience. The students, teachers, and staff are always so friendly and ready to help with anything. There are so many clubs and activities, from skill-building workshops to just-for-fun events, and it feels like there’s something for everyone. These activities have helped me learn new things and make great friends. BUV is not just about academics it’s also a vibrant community where I feel supported and engaged.

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close