School of Digital Arts, Animation and Design - NAD-UQAC vs École de technologie supérieure - ETS vs Academy of Aeronautics vs Cestar College of Business, Health & Technology vs College CDI

Side-by-side comparison from 18 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: School of Digital Arts, Animation and Design - NAD-UQAC (5.00)
School of Digital Arts, Animation and Design - NAD-UQAC: wins 3/7 categories
École de technologie supérieure - ETS: wins 1/7 categories
Academy of Aeronautics: wins 0/7 categories
Cestar College of Business, Health & Technology: wins 0/7 categories
College CDI: wins 0/7 categories
Herzing College: wins 0/7 categories
RUBIKA: wins 3/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Art and Design
Best programme: Electrical Engineering
Montreal, Canada
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Montreal, Canada
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Montreal, Canada
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Valenciennes, France
4.40
Read more reviews
15 reviews
×
Best programme: 2D Animation
Category ratings
Facilities
3.00
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.47
Win
Location
4.00
4.50
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.13
Professors
5.00
Win
3.50
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.27
Internationality
3.00
2.50
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.87
Win
Student life
5.00
Win
1.50
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.20
Value
4.00
3.50
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.67
Win
Accommodation
5.00
Win
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.33
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Industry-relevant opportunities and professional preparation
  • +Supportive and attentive faculty guidance
  • +Lack of English support for international students
  • +Limited scholarship opportunities for non-French speakers
  • +Difficulty finding part-time employment

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Industry-active instructors and professional preparation
  • +Supportive and welcoming atmosphere
  • +Emphasis on practical, project-based learning
Cons
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a significant concern.
  • -Poor communication and a lack of administrative support create frustration.
  • -Overcrowded classrooms and insufficient individual attention hinder learning.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of necessary resources are a common complaint.
  • -The quality and relevance of the curriculum are often criticized.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Facilities are frequently described as outdated and in poor condition.
  • -Teaching quality and curriculum relevance are inconsistent and often disappointing.
Rating summary
What students say

Overall, the university scores well in several key areas. Its strongest aspects are professors, student life, and accommodation, all receiving top marks. Facilities and internationality are identified as areas with moderate ratings. The university also performs well in terms of location and value.

A notable strength of this institution is its prime **Location**, scoring a high 4.5. Conversely, **Student Life** presents a significant area for improvement, with a low rating of 1.5. The university also received solid ratings in **Professors** and **Value** (both 3.5), with **Facilities** and **Accomodation** averaging 3. **Internationality** sits in the middle at 2.5.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its **Value** (4.67) and **Facilities** (4.47), indicating high satisfaction in these key areas. **Accomodation** (4.33) and **Student Life** (4.20) also received positive scores. However, the university's **Location** (3.13) stands out as a comparatively weaker aspect, with **Internationality** (3.87) also receiving a moderate rating.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 5/5 average rating, this university is highly regarded by students, who praise its industry opportunities and career preparation. ~100% of feedback is positive, highlighting supportive teachers.

With an average rating of 4/5 from two reviews, positive feedback comprises approximately 50% of the sentiment. Students highlight French language requirements and inflation as challenges, while one positive review commends the university for not requiring French for graduate students.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With a 4.4/5 average rating from 15 reviews, ~93% are positive. Students praise quality teaching from industry professionals and a supportive, welcoming atmosphere. The heavy workload and project-focused curriculum prepare them well for professional careers.

Rating distribution
5★
100%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
47%
4★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
47%
3★
0%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
7%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close