University of the Punjab - PU vs Lahore University of Management Sciences - LUMS vs Pakistan Institute of Fashion and Design - PIFD vs University College Lahore vs Superior University

Side-by-side comparison from 128 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Pakistan Institute of Fashion and Design - PIFD (5.00)
University of the Punjab - PU: wins 1/4 categories
Lahore University of Management Sciences - LUMS: wins 0/4 categories
Pakistan Institute of Fashion and Design - PIFD: wins 2/4 categories
University College Lahore: wins 1/4 categories
Superior University: wins 0/4 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Chemistry and Chemical Engineering
Best programme: Economics
Best programme: Fashion
Best programme: Civil Engineering
Lahore, Pakistan
3.90
Read more reviews
8 reviews
×
Best programme: Computer Science
Category ratings
Facilities
4.19
4.44
4.50
Win
4.00
4.13
Location
4.66
Win
4.50
4.00
3.50
3.38
Professors
4.43
4.00
5.00
5.00
4.50
Internationality
3.94
3.60
4.00
4.50
Win
3.75
Student life
4.30
4.58
5.00
Win
3.50
4.00
Value
4.36
4.17
4.50
4.50
4.50
Accommodation
3.94
3.76
4.00
4.00
3.63
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Knowledgeable and professional faculty
  • +Strong academic programs and practical experience
  • +Vibrant campus environment and student opportunities
  • +Critical thinking and intellectual freedom
  • +Rigorous academics and competitive environment
  • +Supportive faculty and comprehensive programmes
  • +Supportive and inclusive environment with excellent learning opportunities
  • +Highly valued graduates in the market
  • +Top choice for fashion design and related programs
  • +Quality education and diverse programmes
  • +Supportive environment and extracurriculars
  • +Adequate resources for specific fields
  • +Cooperative and qualified faculty
  • +Career growth focus and practical learning
  • +Positive campus environment
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues, particularly with the IT and exam branches, lead to significant delays and unresponsiveness.
  • -Lack of merit and transparency, often requiring connections for support and recognition.
  • -Outdated staff and teaching methods hinder improvement and motivation.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a common complaint.
  • -Lack of practical application and relevance in coursework is a concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Course content and teaching methods are lacking or unengaging.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring problem.
  • -Illiterate, unethical, and unprofessional staff is a significant concern.
Rating summary
What students say

University ratings reveal strengths and areas for improvement across several key aspects. The institution excels in **Location** with a remarkable score of 4.66, closely followed by **Professors** at 4.43 and **Student Life** at 4.30. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the weakest area, scoring 3.94, with **Internationality** also rating similarly. **Facilities** and **Value** fall within the mid-range at 4.19 and 4.36 respectively.

With impressive scores in several areas, this institution excels particularly in **Student Life** and **Location**, both receiving marks above 4.5. **Facilities** also score highly. Conversely, **Accomodation** and **Internationality** are the areas needing the most improvement, with ratings of 3.76 and 3.6 respectively. **Professors** and **Value** fall comfortably in the middle range of the provided data.

This institution garners excellent scores in several key areas, notably achieving perfect marks for its professors and student life. Facilities and value for money are also highly regarded. The university presents a solid offering in terms of accommodation and internationality, though its location, while good, is rated slightly lower than other aspects.

Performance across various university aspects reveals a strong academic focus, with professors receiving the highest rating of 5. Facilities and accommodation are well-regarded, both scoring 4, complemented by an excellent internationality score of 4.5. Value for money also stands out with a rating of 4.5. The weakest areas, though still respectable, are location and student life, each rated at 3.5.

An analysis of the university's ratings reveals exceptional strengths in **Professors** and **Value**, both scoring a perfect 4.5. **Facilities** and **Student Life** also received commendable scores. Conversely, **Location** emerged as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.375. Other categories like **Accomodation**, **Internationality**, and **Student Life** fall within a moderate to good range, indicating a generally positive student experience with a standout academic and financial offering, offset by the geographical setting.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With ~97.5% positive feedback and an average rating of 4.48/5, students praise knowledgeable faculty, strong academics, and vibrant campus life. A small percentage of reviews mention management and administrative issues.

Nearly all (91%) student reviews praise LUMS for its transformative education, critical thinking encouragement, and supportive faculty. Students value the demanding academics and diverse campus community, finding the experience rewarding despite challenges. No negative feedback was recorded.

With an average rating of 5/5, ~100% of reviews are positive. Students highly recommend the university for fashion programs, citing supportive staff and excellent learning opportunities that lead to market-valued graduates.

With an average rating of 4.5/5, the university is highly praised. Reviews highlight quality education, diverse degree options, and various extracurricular activities. Engineering students specifically note adequate lab equipment and qualified faculty.

Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting cooperative, well-qualified teachers, a focus on career growth, and practical learning. One negative review criticized staff qualifications.

Rating distribution
5★
63%
57%
100%
50%
38%
4★
26%
31%
0%
50%
38%
3★
9%
11%
0%
0%
13%
2★
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
1%
0%
0%
0%
13%
Most useful review
Most liked
About Education system

Im saira students of university of the Punjab i complete my Bs Economics recently i like my university education systems because they give opportunities and chance of needed students of Pakistan and others countries to complete education through funds and scholarships

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

University management and staff

It is very sad to say that one of the best Pakistan institutes of education has such illiterate, unethical and stupid staff in its university. They need to hire qualified staff, so that they can maintain their good standing.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close