New York College European and American Education - NYC vs Faculty of Economics, University of Tirana - FEUT vs University of New York Tirana - UNYT vs University of arts Tirana - UART vs The European University of Tirana - UET

Side-by-side comparison from 35 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
New York College European and American Education - NYC: wins 0/3 categories
Faculty of Economics, University of Tirana - FEUT: wins 0/3 categories
University of New York Tirana - UNYT: wins 0/3 categories
University of arts Tirana - UART: wins 1/3 categories
The European University of Tirana - UET: wins 0/3 categories
Canadian Institute of Technology - CIT: wins 2/3 categories
Western Balkans University - WBU: wins 0/3 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: Informatics
Best programme: Sculpture
Best programme: Accounting and Finance
Best programme: Bachelor of Applied Information Systems Technology in Network Management
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
2.28
3.67
4.00
3.50
5.00
Win
Not rated
Location
Not rated
3.76
4.33
5.00
4.00
5.00
Not rated
Professors
Not rated
3.36
4.67
5.00
4.50
5.00
Not rated
Internationality
Not rated
2.32
4.67
4.00
4.50
5.00
Win
Not rated
Student life
Not rated
2.36
4.00
5.00
3.75
5.00
Not rated
Value
Not rated
3.08
4.67
5.00
3.75
5.00
Not rated
Accommodation
Not rated
2.20
4.00
5.00
Win
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High-quality, multicultural education
  • +Excellent, experienced professors
  • +Strong business programs
  • +Excellent academic programs and preparation for future careers.
  • +Qualified and approachable faculty.
  • +Good campus facilities and international opportunities.
  • +Quality programs and knowledgeable, supportive professors
  • +Engaging faculty and staff
  • +Good learning environment and opportunities
  • +Supportive teachers and new opportunities
  • +Innovative programs and international experiences
  • +Supportive and professional faculty
  • +Excellent facilities and resources
  • +Opportunities for personal and professional growth
  • +Practical and relevant skills
  • +Effective teaching and explanations

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern amenities frustrate students.
  • -Inefficient administrative processes and poor communication cause significant problems.
  • -Overcrowded classrooms and a lack of individual attention detract from the learning experience.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor infrastructure.
  • -Lack of practical application and career support.
  • -Administrative and communication issues.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology impede learning.
  • -High costs are perceived as poor value for the educational experience.
  • -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Unclear expectations and communication lead to confusion.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Ineffective or unengaging teaching methods are a common complaint.
  • -Poor communication and administrative issues are prevalent.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a concern.
  • -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant or not well-implemented.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution presents a uniform, middling performance across all evaluated aspects. With zero ratings in categories spanning facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, there are no standout strengths or discernible weaknesses. The university's profile is entirely consistent, indicating an average experience in every surveyed area.

When examining the university's performance across various categories, location stands out as the strongest area, receiving a high rating. Conversely, accommodation emerges as the weakest point, with the lowest score among the surveyed aspects. Other notable areas include professors and value, which received moderate ratings, while facilities, student life, and internationality scored lower.

This university is highly regarded, particularly excelling in its professors, internationality, and value, all receiving scores of 4.67. Student life, accommodation, and location also score well, with 4.33 to 4.0 ratings. The facilities represent the lowest-rated aspect at 3.67.

Overall, this institution garners excellent reviews, particularly excelling in its professors, location, student life, accommodation, and overall value, all receiving top marks. Facilities and internationality are also strong points, rated highly at four out of five. The university demonstrates a well-rounded offering with its weakest area still being a positive score.

This university garners impressive scores, particularly excelling in **Professors** and **Internationality** with a perfect 4.5. Student Life and Value are also strong at 3.75. The main area for improvement seems to be **Accomodation**, receiving the lowest rating of 3, alongside Facilities at 3.5. Location also scores well at 4.

This institution garners exceptional marks across most aspects, with perfect scores awarded for facilities, professors, location, student life, internationality, and value. The standout strengths lie in its academic offerings and vibrant campus environment. Conversely, accommodation presents a significant weakness, receiving a rating of zero, indicating a critical area requiring improvement.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a single review, the feedback is overwhelmingly positive. The reviewer highlights the high quality of multicultural education and academic collaborations. Professors are described as excellent with practical experience.

Roughly 32% of reviews are negative. Positive feedback highlights prepared professors and good programs, while negative comments cite poor facilities, outdated materials, and lack of practical application.

All three reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4/5. Students highlight good programs, knowledgeable faculty, and a supportive learning environment. No negative feedback was received.

The sole review is highly positive, rating the university a perfect 5/5. The reviewer highlights excellent opportunities for artistic expression, supportive and approachable teachers, and recent innovations like Erasmus programs.

With an average rating of 4.25/5 from 4 reviews, positive feedback (~100%) highlights professional and approachable professors, exceptional facilities, and personal growth opportunities. No negative reviews were provided.

This university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback. One review highlights strong business information systems education, noting excellent treatment and explanations. No negative reviews were recorded.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
0%
4%
0%
100%
50%
100%
0%
4★
100%
32%
100%
0%
25%
0%
0%
3★
0%
32%
0%
0%
25%
0%
0%
2★
0%
16%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
16%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Concerning FEUT

It has a lot of place for improvement in every aspect. It needs to work on it's facilities and schedules. It desperately needs to fix the heat system and all the classrooms. It lacks a lot when it comes to putting in practise what you been studying and should help it's students when it comes to finding an internship.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close