SKEMA Business School vs Carnegie Mellon University vs Duquesne University vs St. Mary's University, San Antonio vs Point Park University
Side-by-side comparison from 218 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical skills and real-world business application
- +International environment and diverse experiences
- +Career development and professional growth
- +Challenging yet supportive academic environment with excellent professors.
- +Diverse and high-achieving student body fostering connections and collaboration.
- +Well-structured courses with real-world applications and encouraging critical thinking.
- +Well-maintained facilities, resources, and housing
- +Excellent academic resources and hands-on training
- +Enjoyable food options
- +Extensive student support
- +Strong marketing and business programmes
- +Ample career opportunities and real-world preparation
- +Supportive and experienced faculty
- +Welcoming learning environment and engaging classes
- +Diverse student and educator backgrounds
- +Opportunities for personal and professional growth
- +Helpful staff and organized curriculum
- +Experiential learning and business creation
- +Industry leader insights and networking opportunities
- +Diverse international environment and impactful outcomes
- -Administrative & management issues
- -Poor communication and guidance
- -Outdated facilities and teaching faculty
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of essential resources are frequently criticized.
- -The curriculum and teaching methods are often perceived as irrelevant or ineffective.
- -Administrative and management issues create confusion and frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of engaging teaching and insufficient student support are common complaints.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
- -Excessive tuition fees for limited resources and facilities.
- -Poorly maintained and run-down campus infrastructure.
- -Staff dissatisfaction and ongoing protests indicating mistreatment.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant problems.
- -Lack of extracurriculars and career support limits student experience.
- -Teaching quality varies and some courses lack depth.
- -Disorganized and unresponsive administration.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
- -Unengaging and ineffective teaching methods.
Across surveyed categories, this institution demonstrates robust strengths in **Internationality (4.43)** and **Professors (4.37)**. Student life, location, and facilities also received positive scores. However, **Accomodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at **3.70**, suggesting potential room for improvement in that specific aspect. The overall value is also rated favorably at 4.09.
This university demonstrates a strong profile, with its **location** standing out as the highest-rated aspect. Facilities, student life, and internationality all received excellent scores, indicating robust offerings in these areas. While professors, accommodation, and value also scored well, they represent the university's comparatively weaker, though still positive, performance.
Across all surveyed categories, this institution achieves a perfect score. Its strongest areas, indistinguishable from its weakest due to uniform excellence, include facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value. Every aspect presented garners a five-star rating, indicating outstanding performance across the board.
This institution excels in several key areas, achieving perfect scores for Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Accommodations. Value for money is also a significant strength, with a top rating. However, the university's weakest aspect is its Location, receiving a score of zero. Internationality is another area for improvement, scoring a moderate two.
This institution garners its highest marks for its professors, reflecting a strong academic core. Areas such as facilities and student life also receive favorable, though slightly lower, scores. Its value proposition stands out positively. Location, accommodation, and internationality are rated similarly, representing areas with moderate performance compared to the university's strengths.
This university is highly rated, particularly excelling in **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring an impressive 4.87. **Professors** also receive strong marks at 4.53. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.62. **Facilities** are also on the lower end at 3.93, though **Student Life** and **Value** are rated positively around 4.1.
This institution garners strong overall evaluations, with location standing out as the highest-rated aspect at 4.67. Accommodations and internationality also received excellent scores of 4.5. Areas demonstrating solid performance include facilities and student life, both at 4.33, alongside value and professors, which are rated at 4.25.
With a 4.37/5 average rating from 175 reviews, approximately 97.7% of students provide positive feedback. Key highlights include practical skills, international opportunities, and professional development. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions poor management and organization.
Approximately 88% of reviews are positive, highlighting diverse minds, engaging coursework, and supportive environments. There are no negative reviews.
This university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback. The single review highlights excellent facilities, resources, and a hands-on educational experience, contributing to a perfect 5/5 average rating.
With one review received, the average rating is 5/5 stars. The feedback highlights strong student support. No negative reviews were submitted.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~77%), praising career opportunities, real-world faculty experience, and hands-on learning. A small portion (~7.7%) expresses concerns about cost and campus upkeep.
The university is highly praised for its diverse student body, rich learning experiences, and opportunities for personal and career growth. However, about 13% of reviews mention inconsistent teaching quality and administrative issues.
With an average rating of 4.4/5 from 5 reviews, students are highly satisfied. Recurring positive themes include practical, hands-on learning experiences and valuable networking opportunities. A minimal amount of feedback noted occasional scheduling issues with tutoring.
Studying at Skema Business School in Sophia Antipolis was a fantastic experience. The campus is modern and located in a wonderful tech hub. The professors bring real-world business experience to the classroom. I loved the multicultural environment and the group projects. Skema gave me great friends, a strong global network, and the right skills for my career.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.
Being here has been such a wild ride. Moving to a new country every semester and learning local languages has been both fun and challenging, but it's kinda exhausting too. Still, that hustle gives me an adrenaline rush I low-key love! The best part has been seeing our business ideas come to life and when people genuinely appreciate and engage with something we’ve built, it makes all the hard work worth it.
