emlyon business school vs London School of Commerce - LSC vs Jagran Lakecity University vs Rajiv Gandhi Proudyogiki Vishwavidyalaya vs VIT Bhopal University

Side-by-side comparison from 72 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: emlyon business school (4.50)
emlyon business school: wins 1/5 categories
London School of Commerce - LSC: wins 1/5 categories
Jagran Lakecity University: wins 0/5 categories
Rajiv Gandhi Proudyogiki Vishwavidyalaya: wins 1/5 categories
VIT Bhopal University: wins 1/5 categories
TETR College of Business: wins 1/5 categories
Barkatullah University Bhopal: wins 0/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Programme Grande Ecole (PGE)
London, The United Kingdom
3.80
Read more reviews
4 reviews
×
Best programme: Administration
Best programme: Mechanical Engineering
Best programme: Cyber Security and Digital Forensics
New York City, United States
4.40
Read more reviews
5 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor of Management & Technology
Best programme: Bachelor in Management
Category ratings
Facilities
4.15
3.25
4.00
4.33
4.00
4.33
2.00
Location
4.60
4.75
Win
3.00
4.00
3.00
4.67
4.00
Professors
4.06
3.25
3.00
4.57
Win
4.00
4.25
4.00
Internationality
4.60
Win
3.50
3.00
3.14
4.00
4.50
1.00
Student life
4.25
3.75
2.00
4.33
3.00
4.33
2.00
Value
4.43
2.75
2.00
4.14
5.00
Win
4.25
3.00
Accommodation
3.94
2.00
4.00
3.83
4.00
4.50
Win
1.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Practical and international programs with diverse students
  • +Valuable professional experience through internships and work-study
  • +Supportive environment for personal and professional development
  • +Accessible resources and supportive faculty
  • +Engaging learning environment and quality instruction
  • +Opportunities for exposure and growth

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive faculty and environment
  • +Strong academic foundation and personal development
  • +Practical learning and updated syllabus
  • +Industry-relevant curriculum and flexible credit system
  • +Supportive and well-qualified faculty
  • +Project-based learning approach
  • +Experiential learning and business creation
  • +Industry leader insights and networking opportunities
  • +Diverse international environment and impactful outcomes
  • +Engaging and supportive professors
  • +Strong foundational business knowledge
Cons
  • -Lack of practical value and shallow content in courses.
  • -Unfair and frustrating grading, especially for group projects.
  • -Disappointing professor engagement and program support.
  • -Administrative and communication issues cause stress.
  • -Lack of support is a recurring problem.

Nothing to show

  • -Unresponsive administration and ineffective management create significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of essential resources hinder the learning experience.
  • -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and not aligned with current industry needs.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support leads to confusion.
  • -Disorganized and unresponsive administration.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Unengaging and ineffective teaching methods.
  • -Poor administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment.
  • -Lack of effective teaching and course structure.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates exceptional strength in its internationality and location, both scoring above 4.5. Student life and value also received positive marks, exceeding 4.2 and 4.4 respectively. However, accommodation presents as the weakest area, with the lowest rating of approximately 3.94. Facilities and professors also received solid, though slightly lower, scores in comparison.

This institution shines brightest in its location, receiving a near-perfect score. Student life and internationality are also areas of moderate strength. Conversely, accommodation stands out as a significant weakness, along with the perceived value of the education. Ratings for facilities and professors are average.

Nothing to show

Academic and campus experiences are generally well-regarded, with professors receiving the highest marks at 4.57. Facilities and student life also score well, both at 4.33. Location is rated at a solid 4. However, internationality is the lowest-rated aspect at 3.14, and accommodation sits at 3.83. The overall value is considered good at 4.14.

This institution demonstrates significant strengths in several key areas, most notably achieving a perfect score for **Value** and high marks in **Facilities**, **Professors**, **Accomodation**, and **Internationality**. The **Location** and **Student Life** present as comparatively weaker aspects, both receiving a rating of 3. Overall, it presents a strong offering with particular emphasis on affordability and resources.

This institution garners strong overall evaluations, with location standing out as the highest-rated aspect at 4.67. Accommodations and internationality also received excellent scores of 4.5. Areas demonstrating solid performance include facilities and student life, both at 4.33, alongside value and professors, which are rated at 4.25.

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **professors** and **location**, both receiving strong ratings. However, significant areas for improvement are evident in **accommodation** and **internationality**, which received the lowest scores. **Facilities** and **student life** also scored poorly. The university achieves a middling **value** rating.

Reviews summary
Highlights

The vast majority of university students have a positive experience, highlighting academic rigor, practical learning, and international environments. A small fraction of reviews mention disappointment with course content and grading.

The university receives predominantly positive feedback (~75%) with students praising supportive instructors and good facilities. A smaller portion of reviews (~25%) notes administrative delays and communication issues.

Nothing to show

With a 4.29/5 average rating from 7 reviews, ~14% of feedback is negative. Students praise the friendly, supportive environment and knowledgeable faculty, highlighting academic and personal growth opportunities.

With one review, the university is rated 4/5 stars. The feedback highlights industry-relevant curriculum, project-based learning, and flexible credit systems. Faculty are generally supportive.

With an average rating of 4.4/5 from 5 reviews, students are highly satisfied. Recurring positive themes include practical, hands-on learning experiences and valuable networking opportunities. A minimal amount of feedback noted occasional scheduling issues with tutoring.

With a 4/5 average rating and no negative feedback (~0%), students praise knowledgeable and supportive professors. They highlight a positive learning environment and valuable foundational business knowledge gained.

Rating distribution
5★
60%
50%
0%
43%
0%
60%
0%
4★
28%
25%
0%
43%
100%
20%
100%
3★
9%
0%
100%
14%
0%
20%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
2%
25%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Loving it here!

Being here has been such a wild ride. Moving to a new country every semester and learning local languages has been both fun and challenging, but it's kinda exhausting too. Still, that hustle gives me an adrenaline rush I low-key love! The best part has been seeing our business ideas come to life and when people genuinely appreciate and engage with something we’ve built, it makes all the hard work worth it.

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close