EU Business School vs Sustainability Management School - SUMAS vs Webster University Geneva vs Institut Avrio de Geneve vs International Institute in Geneva
Side-by-side comparison from 252 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive staff and strong student-staff relationships
- +International environment and diverse community
- +Practical curriculum and interactive classes
- +Engaging and knowledgeable instructors
- +Relevant and practical course content
- +Supportive and collaborative learning environment
- +Diverse international environment and global network
- +Small class sizes and individualized support
- +Accessible campus with many clubs and leadership development programs
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- +Excellent and helpful online classes and lectures
- +Beautiful campus and vibrant student life
- +Strong academic reputation and international recognition
- +Expert faculty with international experience and industry connections.
- -Administrative and management issues are prevalent.
- -Educational quality and facilities are subpar.
- -Extracurricular activities and career support are neglected.
- -Administrative and management issues are prevalent.
- -Lack of transparency in grading and unresponsiveness to student concerns.
- -The school's accreditation and recognition are questionable.
- -Excessive homework and difficult grading policies are often criticized.
- -Students express frustration with administrative inefficiencies and poor management.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are frequently mentioned.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are common complaints.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and insufficient support are problematic.
- -Administrative & management issues create frustration and inefficiency.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of career support and unclear future prospects cause concern.
This institution garners exceptionally high marks in **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring above 4.7. **Student Life** and **Facilities** also receive positive feedback, averaging above 4.0. However, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a considerably lower rating. **Professors** and **Value** fall within the mid-range of scores, indicating satisfactory but not outstanding performance in these aspects.
Overall, the university presents a mixed performance across various aspects. The strongest areas are the professors and internationality, both receiving a solid 3.33 rating. In contrast, student life and accommodation are the weakest points, scoring a low 1. However, facilities and value also lag behind with scores of 1.33, while location sits at a moderate 2.
This institution garners positive feedback across multiple aspects. Its strongest areas include Location, Student Life, Accomodation, and Internationality, all scoring an impressive 4.33. Facilities and Professors are rated solidly at 4, while Value also stands at 4. The university demonstrates a well-rounded offering with a slight edge in student experience and external factors compared to its academic and physical resources.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This institution excels in several key areas, boasting perfect scores for Location, Student Life, and Accomodation. Facilities and Value also received strong marks. Professors and Internationality were rated well, though they represent the areas with slightly lower, yet still positive, scores compared to the university's standout features.
This institution presents a well-rounded profile, excelling particularly in Student Life and Internationality, both achieving perfect scores. Facilities, Professors, Location, and Accomodation are all rated highly at 4 out of 5. The sole area falling slightly below the top tier is Value, also rated at 4.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting supportive staff and international environments. Around 7% of feedback is negative, with minor concerns about organization and academic challenge.
All three reviews are negative (100%), with an average rating of 1/5. Recurring themes include unrecognized degrees, poor administration with unresponsiveness and lack of transparency in grading, and disorganized, unprofessional management.
All three reviews are positive, averaging 4.33/5 stars. Students highlight the strong international environment, small class sizes, and the benefits of its Geneva location, with ~100% of feedback being positive.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 3.5/5, positive feedback (~50%) highlights excellent online classes and a great learning environment. Negative feedback is negligible, representing ~0% of the total.
The university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~100% of reviews being favorable. Students highlight excellent professors with international experience who provide valuable networking opportunities for jobs and internships.
I'm thrilled to share my experience at EU Business School. The professors are industry experts who bring real-world insights to the classroom. The classes are interactive and engaging, with a focus on practical applications. I've achieved amazing things, including internships, networking opportunities, and launching my own business project. The campus life is vibrant, with a diverse community of students from around the world. Overall, EU Business School has given me the skills, confidence, and network to pursue my entrepreneurial dreams. I highly recommend it to anyone seeking a business education that truly prepares you for the real worldworld.
1. Kindly note, it is a registered private school only, but the degrees are school-issued, not officially recognized Swiss university degrees. They are relying on the entry-tier US accreditor ACBSP itself, which is well below AACSB/EQUIS/AMBA/HEdA accreditation. So please do not be confused thinking it is a proper Swiss university. 2. Actually the school is more like a small company only, having less than 5 staff members on site. And one thing I must tell, before enrollment they are very friendly, but after joining the friendliness is finishing. 3. In the classes there are hardly 5 students at master's and bachelor's level, and many times nobody is even coming to the campus. On top of that, the teachers/staffs seemed to get fired in the middle of the semester itself. 4. One more important thing , the grades are coming from the the founder or staffs directly, very subjective and no transparency at all. The professors are not even having the right to decide the final grade!! How can this be acceptable, I am asking? 5. Now they have started selling online courses also. So I will not be surprised if one fine day they are closing the campus fully and doing only online business.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
