University of Nis - GAF vs National Taiwan University - NTU vs University of Nis Faculty of Electronic Engineering vs Istanbul Ticaret University vs Faculty of Sports and Physical Education University of Nis

Side-by-side comparison from 16 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: National Taiwan University - NTU (5.00)
University of Nis - GAF: wins 4/4 categories
National Taiwan University - NTU: wins 0/4 categories
University of Nis Faculty of Electronic Engineering: wins 0/4 categories
Istanbul Ticaret University: wins 0/4 categories
Faculty of Sports and Physical Education University of Nis: wins 0/4 categories
University of Niš Faculty of Law: wins 0/4 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Sociology
Best programme: Accounting and Taxation
Best programme: Computer Engineering and Informatics
Best programme: Political Economy
Category ratings
Facilities
5.00
Win
4.33
3.29
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Location
5.00
5.00
3.86
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
5.00
Win
4.67
3.43
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
5.00
Win
4.67
3.00
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
5.00
5.00
3.86
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Value
5.00
5.00
3.43
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
5.00
Win
4.67
2.57
1.00
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Excellent faculty and diverse modules
  • +Encouraging professors fostering individual growth
  • +Excellent academic resources and quality faculty
  • +Beautiful campus and diverse student opportunities
  • +Welcoming and safe environment for international students
  • +Strong career & hiring opportunities
  • +Support for student events & exchanges
  • +supportive and close-knit student community
  • +limited English-taught courses and Erasmus opportunities for non-English speakers

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Course content and delivery are often seen as irrelevant or poorly executed.
  • -Poor communication and administrative issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources hinder learning.
  • -A perceived lack of support and engagement from faculty is a major concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of support and communication from staff is a problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant problem.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support are frequently mentioned.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Across the board, this institution demonstrates exceptional strengths, achieving a perfect score of 5 in all evaluated areas. This indicates outstanding performance in its facilities, professor quality, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value. There are no apparent weak areas, as every category received the highest possible rating.

This institution garners exceptional marks, with perfect scores in Location, Student Life, and Value. Professors and Accommodations also receive strong ratings at approximately 4.67. While Internationality is similarly well-regarded, Facilities represent the weakest area, rated at 4.33. Overall, the university presents a compelling offering across most aspects.

A university assessment reveals a strong emphasis on location and student life, both scoring 3.86. Professors and value also received solid ratings around 3.43. The weakest area identified is accommodation, with a score of 2.57, suggesting room for improvement. Facilities and internationality fall in the middle, with scores of 3.29 and 3.00 respectively.

This institution demonstrates considerable strengths in its **facilities** and **location**, both receiving a rating of 4. **Student life** also scores well at 4. Conversely, the **accommodation** stands out as a significant weakness, with a low rating of 1. Ratings for **professors**, **internationality**, and **value** are moderate, all sitting at a 3.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 3.5/5 average rating from two reviews, positive feedback (~100%) highlights excellent faculty and professors encouraging growth. One reviewer mentioned diverse modules but noted a lack of chemistry labs. No negative feedback was recorded.

All 6 reviews are positive (100%), with an average rating of 5/5. Students frequently highlight excellent academic resources, dedicated professors, and a beautiful campus environment. No negative feedback was reported.

With an average rating of 3.29/5, ~74% of feedback is positive, highlighting opportunities for hiring and exchange programs. Some suggest improving practical job-relevant knowledge and sector efficiency.

This university receives highly positive feedback, with a 4/5 average rating. The small student community and Erasmus opportunities are frequently praised. Turkish is the primary language of instruction, though some English courses are available.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4★
50%
0%
29%
100%
0%
0%
3★
50%
0%
71%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close