University of Wroclaw - UWr vs Graduate School for Social Research - GSSR vs Cracow University of Technology - PK vs Silesian University of Technology - SUT vs University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn - UWM
Side-by-side comparison from 230 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Well-organized university with responsive administration
- +Inspiring learning environment with quality education and practical experience
- +Welcoming international community and enjoyable student life in a beautiful city
- +High-quality teaching and respected professors
- +Engaging academic content and insightful thinkers
- +Well-organized courses and prepared materials
- +Practical, up-to-date courses and hands-on learning
- +Helpful, passionate professors and supportive staff
- +Opportunities for personal and academic growth
- +Modern, well-equipped labs for hands-on learning
- +Strong industry ties and career opportunities
- +Supportive environment for student development and research
- +High-quality teaching and helpful professors
- +Positive and international atmosphere
- +Good facilities and campus environment
- +High-quality education with excellent, approachable professors and a supportive atmosphere.
- +Diverse, international, and social environment with many opportunities.
- +Modern, well-equipped facilities and a positive urban setting.
- +High-quality teaching and knowledgeable professors
- +Excellent resources, including new and fast computers
- -Outdated and irrelevant course content not suitable for English Philology graduates.
- -Lack of promised opportunities beyond specific career paths like translation or business.
- -Severely underfunded and inadequate facilities.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistently disliked.
- -Lack of resources, including technology and learning materials, is a significant complaint.
- -Administrative and management issues frustrate students.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from faculty and staff is disappointing.
- -Administrative & management issues are a significant source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor infrastructure are frequently criticized.
- -Lack of effective communication and student support is a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are a major concern.
- -Administrative inefficiencies and poor communication cause significant frustration.
- -Lack of engaging teaching methods and uninspired curriculum are often criticized.
- -Excessive administrative burdens and lack of efficient management.
- -Outdated or poorly maintained facilities and resources.
- -Unengaging curriculum and ineffective teaching methods.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and resources significantly hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of practical application and relevance in the curriculum is a major concern.
Evaluations reveal a university with notable strengths in location, boasting a score of 4.81, and in its professors, earning a 4.47. Student life and value are also highly regarded. The weakest area identified is accommodation, with a rating of 3.99, suggesting room for improvement in this category. Facilities and internationality also received solid, above-average scores.
Across all surveyed categories, the university has received consistent ratings of zero. This indicates no discernible strengths or weaknesses in facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, or value. The uniform scores suggest a lack of significant positive or negative attributes in any area evaluated.
This institution receives strong acclaim for its internationality, scoring 4.35, and its value, rated at 4.29. Facilities and student life are also highly regarded, both at 4.25. Professors are well-rated at 4.06, while accommodation stands as the weakest area, with a score of 4. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded picture with particularly impressive international appeal.
Across several key metrics, this institution garners positive feedback. Its strongest areas are Location, with a rating of 4.33, and Student Life, scoring 4.29. Professors also received a commendable rating of 4.21. The weakest area identified is Internationality, which received a score of 3.92, with Facilities and Accomodation rated at 4.0. Value is also rated at a solid 4.
This university demonstrates a strong performance in several key areas, notably excelling in Location (4.86) and Student Life (4.71). Internationality (4.29) and Value (4.14) also receive high marks. Facilities (4) and Accommodations (3.86) are rated well, though slightly lower. The area with the lowest rating is Professors (3.57).
This institution garners strong ratings across several key areas. Location and value are particularly well-regarded, achieving scores over 4.2. Internationality and professors also score highly, exceeding 4.1. While student life and accommodation are rated positively, facilities represent the weakest area among the surveyed categories.
Across all surveyed categories, this institution achieves a perfect score. Each aspect, from its modern facilities and experienced professors to its vibrant student life and convenient location, is rated a flawless five. Accommodation and internationality also receive top marks, suggesting a well-rounded and highly satisfactory experience for students. With a perfect value rating, the university appears to excel in all measured areas, presenting no discernible weak points.
The university receives strong positive feedback (~86%) regarding inspiring people, good organization, and enjoyable student life. A small percentage of reviews (~3.9%) mention program course design issues and underfunded facilities.
With a 4.5/5 average rating, 100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight excellent professors and high-quality content, though some note outdated management and poor funding.
Nearly all 100% of reviews are positive, with students highlighting practical and up-to-date courses, helpful professors, and opportunities for personal and academic growth. The average rating is 4.06/5.
With an average rating of 4.35/5, roughly 99% of reviews are positive. Students praise modern lab facilities, strong industry links, and hands-on learning opportunities like Project Based Learning. Administration navigation is a minor frustration for some.
All 7 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.43/5. Students highlight excellent teaching, helpful professors, and a great atmosphere. Some note older facilities, though recent modernizations are appreciated.
With a 4.13/5 average rating from 98 reviews, ~94% are positive, highlighting a high-quality education, supportive academic staff, and a social, dynamic city. No negative feedback was received.
With a perfect 5/5 average rating from one review, feedback is entirely positive (~100%). Students praise good professors and high teaching levels. Fast, new computers also contributed to a positive experience.
As a current master's student in the Communication Management program at the University of Wroclaw, I can confidently say that this journey has been one of the most enriching experiences of my life, not only academically, but also personally and professionally. 1. Global opportunities through Erasmus+: During my time here, I’ve joined two short-term BIP exchange programs in Spain and Romania (with a generous grant), and have a one-year exchange in Germany. These experiences have allowed me to meet peers from across Europe, learn in diverse settings, and grow both culturally and intellectually. 2. Serious research, strong support: I’m currently representing our Institute in a Monography research project of UWr, a valuable opportunity to engage deeply with academic work and collaborate with professors in a meaningful way. The opportunity is open for all students who wanna pursue an academic path. 3. Supportive and passionate faculty: The professors are not only knowledgeable but also truly approachable. In the first semester, I approached my professor for guidance on career path, research opportunities, and expressed my interest. She shared insightful experiences, motivated and encouraged me a lot. And she nominated me for the Monography research project under her supervision, and I got the opportunity. I'm grateful, honestly. 4. Practice-oriented learning: Unlike many programs that are heavy on theory, this one focuses on real-world projects, case studies, and group work - ideal for master's-level students who want to build practical skills for the workplace. Actually, I don't face much study pressure, I enjoy the courses. 5. International Office that really cares: The International Office team is incredibly helpful. During the application process, I was surprised that they always responded to my email inquiries quickly and helped me resolve any issues. When I study here, from paperworks support to academic/exchange activities, they are always ready to assist and create a welcoming environment for students from all over the world. 6. Peaceful lifestyle & affordable living: Wroclaw is a charming, student-friendly city with a mix of history and modernity. The cost of living is reasonable, making it accessible for many international students without compromising on quality of life. I travelled to many cities in European countries, but Wroclaw is one of the most peaceful and affordable cities. Although the English skills of the city officers are limited, they always try to support by using Google Translate or finding support people. Studying at the University of Wroclaw has opened doors I never imagined: from international networks to research, from personal growth to professional clarity. If you're looking for an educational experience that truly takes you beyond the classroom, this could be your next big step. I appreciate this experience and believe that this is a worthy step to open up many opportunities to explore the world!
I have found great thinkers among both students and lecturers. I have enjoyed some courses more than I took pleasure in others, but that is solely due to my increased interest and the preference I hold for theory, especially social and cultural, whereby my greatest pleasure must have been meeting and partaking in classes held by professor Slawomir Kapralski whom I hold in highest respect. The classes are well-ordered and organized, the material is prepared and provided, the professors are attentive, kind and prompt in their correspondence - no less is the case when it comes to the correspondence one seeks in the support that the dean or the rest of the faculty staff will be willing to provide.
Nothing to show
Studies, are at very good level, but the most important think is what university gives you apart from lectures. There are so many free courser, and student organisactions you can join. Ya'll never get bored here.
Nothing to show
I was an international student at the University of Lodz in Poland. I am very happy that I choose this university for my masters studies. May be for some one its not but the overall discipline is appreciable.
Nothing to show
