Erasmus Hogeschool Brussel - EHB vs Odisee University of Applied Sciences vs Institut des hautes études des communications sociales - IHEC vs Vesalius College Brussels - VeCo vs Center for Creative Leadership
Side-by-side comparison from 33 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Inclusive community and support for diverse students
- +High-quality teaching and artistic focus
- +Vibrant student life and cultural enrichment
- +Hands-on, real-world focused learning and projects
- +Strong preparation for business and professional life
- +Supportive and personal student-professor relationships
- +Strong practical and professional focus
- +High quality, relevant course content and diverse specializations
- +Connection to the professional world and competent instructors
- +Accessible and supportive instructors
- +Engaging and well-structured courses
- +Strong career services and graduate support
- +Student-centered support and inclusivity
- +Welcoming and understanding community
- +High-quality, practical courses and supportive professors
- +International outlook and diverse student body
- +Numerous travel and internship opportunities
- +Experiential learning and practical application of business concepts
- +High-quality instruction and direct industry leader engagement
- +International exposure and strong peer networking opportunities
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources detract from the learning experience.
- -Communication breakdowns and lack of transparency are recurring problems.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Lack of engaging teaching methods leads to disinterest.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent disruptions.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
- -administrative and management issues
- -lack of transparency and limited support
- -a disconnect between advertised quality and actual experience
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Facilities are often described as outdated or poorly maintained.
- -Course content is perceived as irrelevant or not up-to-date.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are a significant concern.
- -The curriculum and teaching quality are often criticized for being ineffective.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor resources detract from learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
A varied profile emerges from these university ratings, with its strongest areas being **Internationality** (4.175) and **Location** (4.15). **Facilities** (3.833) and **Professors** (3.825) also received commendable scores. On the other hand, **Student Life** (3.225) and **Accomodation** (3.375) represent areas with the lowest reported satisfaction, while **Value** (3.725) falls in the mid-range.
This institution garners impressive scores in several key areas, particularly excelling in Internationality and Professor quality. Location also received a very high rating. Areas for improvement include Accomodation and Facilities, which scored lower in comparison to other categories. Student Life and Value also present moderately strong performances.
This institution presents a generally positive profile. Its strongest aspects are the **Professors** and **Location**, both receiving a 4 out of 5. Conversely, **Facilities** represent the weakest area, rated at 3. The university also scores a respectable 3.5 in **Student Life**, **Accomodation**, **Internationality**, and **Value**, indicating a solid, well-rounded experience.
This university received uniformly average ratings of 1 across all evaluated categories. There are no standout strengths or weaknesses, indicating a consistent level of performance across facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value. The institution presents a balanced, albeit unremarkable, profile based on this assessment.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths, with perfect scores awarded for Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, and Value. These areas represent the university's most outstanding attributes. The accommodation rating of 3 indicates a moderate but not exceptional aspect of the student experience. Internationality also scores well at 4, suggesting a generally welcoming environment for global students.
This university garners its highest marks in **Internationality** (4.43) and **Value** (4.29), suggesting a strong global presence and perceived worth. **Professors** also receive a commendable rating (4.14). Areas for potential improvement include **Facilities** and **Location**, both scoring 3.43. **Student Life** (3.57) and **Accommodation** (3.71) fall in the mid-range, indicating a solid but not exceptional experience in these aspects.
This institution garners exceptionally high marks, particularly excelling in Student Life with a perfect score. Facilities, Location, and Accomodation are also strong, all receiving 4.5 ratings. Professors and Value are rated highly at 4.67. The lowest score, though still solid, is for Internationality at 4.33.
Three out of five reviews are positive (60%). Students highlight financial and community resources, classroom experience, and cultural diversity as strengths. One review mentioned building infrastructure could be improved.
All 13 reviews are positive, averaging 4.54/5 stars. Students praise the practical, real-world focus of courses and the helpful, personal relationships with professors.
With 100% positive feedback, students praise the university's practical, professional focus and strong connection to the industry. They highlight hands-on learning, project-based work, and competent instructors.
Two reviews exist, both negative (1-2 stars) with an average rating of 1/5. Feedback highlights limited support, questionable transparency, and an internal culture needing improvement.
With one review, the university is highly rated at 5/5. This positive feedback highlights excellent student care and a welcoming environment. No negative reviews were received.
With a 4/5 average rating and ~0% negative feedback, reviews highlight excellent education, attentive professors, and high-quality, applicable courses. Opportunities for travel and an international outlook are recurring positive themes.
With an average rating of 4.75/5 from four reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight hands-on learning, business idea development, and valuable connections with industry leaders and peers as significant benefits. Minimal negative feedback was present.
Nothing to show
The university gives a hands on experience on learning and applying theory to action,We learn everything for the business world and we work on assignments through the whole academic year, we develop strategies, campaigns and everything you need to know for the business world
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Being here has been such a wild ride. Moving to a new country every semester and learning local languages has been both fun and challenging, but it's kinda exhausting too. Still, that hustle gives me an adrenaline rush I low-key love! The best part has been seeing our business ideas come to life and when people genuinely appreciate and engage with something we’ve built, it makes all the hard work worth it.
