London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs ONCAMPUS Global vs College of Estate Management vs Henley Business School vs University of West London
Side-by-side comparison from 495 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Knowledgeable and approachable faculty
- +High-quality academic programs and clear feedback
- +Excellent facilities and resources
- +Supportive and approachable teachers
- +Excellent student support services
- +Convenient campus location and facilities
- +Helpful professors and interesting classes
- +Flexibility of remote learning
- +Practical application of theory
- +Strong academic programmes and career support
- +Supportive environment and vibrant campus life
- +Strong industry connections and career opportunities
- +Engaging and relevant curriculum
- +Positive social environment and helpful staff
- +Supportive and inclusive community
- +Knowledgeable and approachable lecturers
- +Engaging courses with practical application
- +Exceptional teaching quality from passionate, experienced instructors
- +Unmatched precision, emphasis on quality, and professional skill development
- +Welcoming environment, strong support, and valuable alumni network
- -Poor teaching quality and unstructured courses.
- -High fees combined with lack of support and career services.
- -Limited social life and judgmental environment.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are prevalent.
- -Inefficient administrative processes and lack of clear communication are frustrating.
- -Limited resources and support for academic needs are a concern.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a consistent problem.
- -Lack of resources and support hinder academic progress.
- -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities are a recurring complaint.
- -Course content and teaching methods are often criticized.
- -Administrative and communication issues cause confusion and disruption.
- -Unapproachable and rude staff with a hands-off teaching mentality.
- -Lack of student motivation and university indifference to student well-being.
- -General university environment and town safety concerns.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are disappointing.
- -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from real-world needs.
Examining the university's performance reveals a diverse set of scores. The strongest areas are **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving very high marks. **Student Life** stands out as the weakest performing category. Other areas like **Professors**, **Accomodation**, and **Facilities** received solid, above-average ratings, with **Value** also scoring positively.
This institution garners strong approval across multiple aspects, with particularly high marks for its **Professors (4.76)** and **Location (4.75)**. Student life and internationality also score well, above 4.5. **Accommodations (4.35)** received the lowest rating, though still generally positive, while facilities and value demonstrate solid, above-average performance.
This institution garners exceptional scores in several key areas, notably Facilities, Location, Internationality, and Value, all receiving a perfect 5. Professors and Student Life also score well with a 4. The primary area for potential improvement is Accomodation, which received the lowest rating of 3.
This institution demonstrates a strong performance in student life and internationality, both receiving high marks. Location and accommodation also score well. However, the university's weakest area is its value for money, which is rated lower than other aspects. Facilities and professors receive solid, above-average scores, indicating general satisfaction across these key areas.
This institution receives particularly high marks for its **Internationality** (4.46) and **Location** (4.45). **Professors** (4.43) and **Facilities** (4.42) also score very well. **Student Life** (4.19) and **Value** (4.33) are rated positively. The **Accomodation** (3.89) is the lowest-scoring area, though still above average.
This institution garners positive feedback across multiple aspects. Its **location** stands out as the highest-rated area, achieving a score of 4.49. **Facilities** and **internationality** also received strong scores, both above 4.30. **Accommodation** is the lowest-rated category, coming in at 4.03, though still a respectable score. Overall, the university demonstrates a solid performance with a particular strength in its surroundings.
This university demonstrates exceptional strength in its **location** (4.7), **professors** (4.6), and **internationality** (4.6). Students are particularly impressed with the quality of instruction and the global environment. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at 3.0, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect. Student life and value for money also received moderate scores.
Approximately 96.6% of reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable professors, supportive learning environments, and strong academic reputations. A small percentage (around 3.4%) of negative feedback cites issues with lecturing, grading, and course structure.
All 21 reviews are positive, averaging 4.76/5 stars. Students frequently praised helpful teachers, strong academic support, and good facilities. Some also highlighted a positive transition experience and newfound confidence.
The single review is highly positive, rating the university a perfect 5/5. The student praised helpful professors and interesting classes, especially appreciating the option for remote learning.
With an average rating of 4.2/5, ~80% of reviews are positive. Students highlight hands-on learning, strong career preparation, and supportive campus environments. No negative feedback was received.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~86% praising great experiences, helpful staff, and relevant courses. A small amount of negative feedback, ~2%, concerns administrative communication and organization.
~96% of reviews are positive, highlighting supportive communities, knowledgeable and engaging lecturers, and beneficial learning experiences. A small minority (~4%) of feedback mentions issues with lecturer approachability and teaching style.
Students highly praise the exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable instructors. Facilities are noted as impeccable and the learning environment welcoming, contributing to professional and personal growth for ~100% of reviewers.
LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
