Tampere University - TUNI vs Aalto University vs South-Eastern Finland University of Applied Sciences - XAMK vs Hanken School of Economics vs HELBUS Helsinki School of Business

Side-by-side comparison from 110 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Tampere University - TUNI: wins 0/2 categories
Aalto University: wins 0/2 categories
South-Eastern Finland University of Applied Sciences - XAMK: wins 0/2 categories
Hanken School of Economics: wins 0/2 categories
HELBUS Helsinki School of Business: wins 2/2 categories
Lapland University of Applied Sciences: wins 0/2 categories
University of Turku: wins 0/2 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Electrical Engineering
Espoo, Finland
4.70
Read more reviews
37 reviews
×
Best programme: Computer Engineering
Best programme: BHC in Nursing
Best programme: Marketing and Management
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: Bachelor of Business Administration
Best programme: Information Technology
Category ratings
Facilities
4.63
4.41
4.79
5.00
5.00
4.50
4.25
Location
4.06
4.08
4.50
4.00
5.00
Win
4.50
3.88
Professors
4.26
4.14
4.92
5.00
5.00
4.50
4.25
Internationality
4.11
4.35
4.75
2.00
5.00
Win
4.50
4.00
Student life
4.74
4.32
4.54
5.00
5.00
4.50
3.71
Value
4.26
4.38
4.75
5.00
5.00
4.50
4.13
Accommodation
4.24
4.26
4.42
4.00
5.00
5.00
3.88
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Supportive faculty and flexible personal study plans
  • +Welcoming international environment and diverse student body
  • +Well-structured programs with practical application and research opportunities
  • +Interdisciplinary studies and cross-major flexibility
  • +Independent learning and hands-on, practical experiences
  • +Strong community support and active student life
  • +Passionate, supportive, and communicative educators
  • +Practical, career-focused programmes and real-world connections
  • +International atmosphere and flexible learning paths
  • +High teaching quality and experienced lecturers
  • +Engaging international environment
  • +Helpful support services
  • +Personalized guidance and support for academic progress
  • +Motivating and helpful staff
  • +Opportunities for quick graduation
  • +Practical, problem-solving courses and hands-on learning.
  • +Dedicated, friendly professors and an international environment.
  • +Opportunities for practical experience and cross-university integration.
  • +Approachable professors & strong academic programs
  • +Welcoming city & positive student community
  • +Good accommodation & proximity to campus
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues, particularly due to university reforms.
  • -Lack of responsiveness and clarity from administration.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Insufficient academic support and resources.
  • -Inefficient administrative processes cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and transparency from staff creates confusion.
  • -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are a recurring complaint.
  • -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant or poorly implemented.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance detract from the learning environment.
  • -Inconsistent and unsupportive teaching staff create a negative academic experience.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration and inefficiency.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of adequate support, resources, and clear communication are major drawbacks.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of effective communication and support is a problem.
Rating summary
What students say

The university garners significant acclaim, particularly in **Student Life**, which stands out with a 4.74 rating. **Facilities** also score very highly at 4.63. Areas such as **Accomodation** (4.24), **Professors** (4.26), and **Value** (4.26) show solid performance. **Internationality** is rated at 4.11, and **Location** is the lowest scored category at 4.06, though still strong.

This institution exhibits a strong overall performance, particularly excelling in its **Facilities**, which received the highest rating. **Student Life** and **Internationality** also scored very well. The **Location** emerged as the area with the lowest rating, though it still falls within a generally positive range. The university demonstrates a commendable balance across its assessed aspects.

This institution earns exceptionally high marks, particularly in the **professors** category with a near-perfect score. **Facilities** and **internationality** also stand out with strong ratings. Areas receiving slightly lower, though still positive, scores include **student life** and **accommodation**. Overall, the university demonstrates a well-rounded positive profile.

This institution excels in several key areas, boasting perfect scores for Facilities, Professors, and Student Life, alongside a strong rating for Value. Accommodations are also well-regarded. However, the university's Internationality score is notably lower than other aspects, indicating a potential area for development. The location also received a good, but not perfect, rating.

Exceptional scores were awarded across every aspect of the university. The facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value all received a perfect 5 out of 5. This indicates a uniformly excellent experience with no discernible weak areas, suggesting a consistently high-quality educational environment.

This institution receives consistently high marks across most aspects. Its **strongest area is accommodation**, achieving a perfect score. The university also excels in its facilities, professors, location, student life, internationality, and overall value, all rated at an impressive 4.5. There are no explicitly weak areas indicated by these scores.

Overall, this university garners strong ratings across several key areas. Facilities and professors are particularly well-regarded, both receiving 4.25. Internationality is also a positive, scoring a 4. Value for money is also strong at 4.125. The weakest areas appear to be student life (3.71) and location and accommodation, both rated at 3.875.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 4.43 average rating from 35 reviews, approximately 74% praise the inclusive environment, supportive teachers, and flexible study plans. A small portion (~3%) notes declining teaching quality due to university reformation.

The university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback (~100% of reviews) with an average rating of 4.44/5. Recurring themes highlight the value of interdisciplinary studies, independent learning, and strong community support.

All 26 reviews are positive, averaging 4.88/5. Students praise practical, student-centered education, supportive teachers, and innovation. A minor concern was difficulty securing clinical practice due to language skills.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating from one review, this university is highly praised for its excellent teaching quality and strong international environment. Positive feedback highlights engaging academics and helpful support services.

This university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with a perfect 5/5 average rating. The single review highlights helpful staff, advice, opportunities, and motivational support. No negative feedback was reported.

With a 4.5/5 average rating and 100% positive feedback, students praise Lapland UAS for its entrepreneurship focus, practical problem-solving courses, and dedicated professors. The university's energetic environment and opportunity to integrate with other institutions are highlighted positively.

All 8 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.25/5. Students praise well-structured programs, approachable professors, and a strong sense of community. The city of Turku is also frequently mentioned as a positive aspect.

Rating distribution
5★
60%
57%
88%
100%
100%
50%
25%
4★
26%
38%
12%
0%
0%
50%
75%
3★
11%
11%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Great combinations of business and tech

I graduated from Aalto University's School of Business, majoring in Marketing, and I'd genuinely recommend it. What made the biggest difference for me, though, was the freedom to take courses outside my own major. I ended up mixing in some technology and design courses with my marketing courses, and that has turned out to be one of the most useful parts of my degree.

My experience studying nursing at Xamk.

Studying nursing at Xamk has been a practical and rewarding experience to me regardless of my previous background in-terms of profession. The programme strongly focuses on hands-on skills, simulation training, and clinical placements, which has helped me connect theory directly to real nursing practice. The teachers are supportive and approachable, and the learning environment encourages growth both professionally and personally, being able to also learn a new language (Finnish) within a short period of time with the help of Xamk has been a great milestone to me. Overall, Xamk has prepared me well for working life in healthcare.

Nothing to show

Very helpful teachers/staff

This school was very good and helpful, I wanted to graduate quickly and they have helped me achieve this, they gave me advice and opportunities and they were checking in on my progress. Very motivating to be surrounded by the staff.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close