École Normale Supérieure - ENS vs Constructor University Bremen vs BI Norwegian Business School - BI vs University of Bergen vs NHH Norwegian School of Economics

Side-by-side comparison from 35 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Feni Polytechnic Institute - FPI (5.00)
École Normale Supérieure - ENS: wins 0/6 categories
Constructor University Bremen: wins 1/6 categories
BI Norwegian Business School - BI: wins 0/6 categories
University of Bergen: wins 1/6 categories
NHH Norwegian School of Economics: wins 2/6 categories
Feni Polytechnic Institute - FPI: wins 1/6 categories
Western Norway University of Applied Sciences: wins 1/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Computer Science
Best programme: Electrical and Computer Engineering
Best programme: B.Sc. in International Business Administration
Best programme: Biomedical Sciences
Best programme: Economics and Finance
Best programme: Mechanical Engineering
Best programme: Engineering
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
4.15
4.50
4.00
4.71
Win
4.00
3.50
Location
4.33
3.75
4.50
4.33
4.14
5.00
Win
3.00
Professors
4.00
4.38
4.50
3.86
4.43
4.00
4.50
Internationality
3.33
4.77
Win
4.00
4.00
4.43
3.00
4.50
Student life
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.43
Win
4.29
4.00
3.50
Value
4.33
4.08
3.00
4.14
4.14
4.00
4.50
Win
Accommodation
4.00
4.15
3.00
4.00
4.71
Win
4.00
3.50
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Rigorous and research-driven education
  • +Intellectually stimulating and interdisciplinary environment
  • +Close faculty-student relationships and diverse opportunities
  • +International community and diverse cultural exchange
  • +Strong academic environment with approachable professors
  • +Vibrant campus and opportunities for personal growth
  • +Knowledgeable lecturers and strong academic environment
  • +Practical approach and industry connections
  • +Good location and food variety
  • +Excellent academic programs and knowledgeable professors
  • +Strong student support services and welfare provisions
  • +Vibrant international community and city-integrated campus life
  • +Free tuition and diverse program options
  • +High quality education and international exchange opportunities
  • +Supportive environment and welcoming community
  • +Academic excellence and practical learning
  • +Highly qualified and encouraging teachers
  • +Safe, disciplined, and motivating campus environment
  • +Flexible online format and structure
  • +Career-focused and practical learning
  • +Supportive instructors and engaging lectures
Cons
  • -Inefficient administrative processes and poor communication.
  • -Lack of modernization in facilities and technology.
  • -Limited career support and unclear future prospects.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of essential resources are common complaints.
  • -Poor communication and a lack of support negatively impact the student experience.
  • -Students dislike the lack of proper support and communication from staff.
  • -They often complain about outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources.
  • -Students express frustration with the curriculum and teaching methods being unengaging or irrelevant.
  • -Outdated or problematic lecture streaming software hinders communication with instructors.
  • -Administrative and management issues create a frustrating student experience.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a recurring concern.
  • -Poor teaching quality and curriculum relevance are often criticized.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are frequently criticized.
  • -Poor communication and a perceived lack of support negatively impact the student experience.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause confusion and frustration.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support creates a negative student experience.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution generally receives positive evaluations across key aspects. Its strengths lie in **Location** and **Value**, both scoring 4.33. **Facilities**, **Professors**, **Student Life**, and **Accomodation** are also rated a solid 4. The area with the lowest score is **Internationality**, at 3.33. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded offering with notable advantages in practical and financial considerations.

This institution demonstrates considerable strengths, particularly in its Internationality, receiving a near-perfect score. Professors are also highly rated, followed closely by Facilities and Accomodation, which received identical scores. Student Life is well-regarded, and Value for money is also solid. The Location, while still a positive attribute, appears to be the relatively weakest area of the surveyed categories.

This institution demonstrates remarkable strengths, with exceptional ratings for its Facilities, Professors, and Location, all scoring an impressive 4.5. Student Life and Internationality also receive solid marks at 4. However, Accommodations and Value emerge as areas needing development, each receiving a lower score of 3.

This institution demonstrates excellent performance, with student life and location receiving the highest marks at approximately 4.43 and 4.33 respectively. Facilities, accommodation, and internationality are all rated a solid 4. Professors represent the weakest area, scoring 3.86. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded experience, with particular strengths in its vibrant student community and convenient setting.

This institution receives exceptionally high marks for its facilities and accommodation, both scoring an outstanding 4.7. Professors and internationality are also strong points, with ratings of 4.4. Student life and value for money are rated at 4.3 and 4.1 respectively. The university's location is its weakest area, though still a respectable 4.1.

This institution presents a well-rounded academic and student experience, with a perfect score for its location. Facilities, professors, student life, accommodation, and overall value all received solid 4-star ratings. The weakest area noted is internationality, which scored a 3. This suggests a strong, generally positive environment with room for growth in global engagement.

This institution demonstrates significant strengths in **Professors** and **Internationality**, both receiving top scores of 4.5. **Value** also stands out at a high 4.5. Conversely, **Location** received the lowest rating at 3. The remaining areas of Facilities, Student Life, and Accommodation are rated solidly at 3.5, indicating a generally positive, though not exceptional, experience in these aspects.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4/5 from 3 reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight rigorous education, research focus, and interdisciplinary flexibility. Some note demanding workloads, but emphasize the immense rewards.

With an average rating of 4.15/5, ~92% of reviews are positive. Students highlight rigorous academics, excellent facilities, and a highly international environment fostering personal and cultural growth through diverse interactions. No negative feedback was provided.

With an average rating of 4/5, student feedback is highly positive. Reviewers consistently praise the great location, knowledgeable lecturers, and strong academic environment. Industry connections and a practical approach to education were also highlighted.

With a 4.14/5 average, reviews are overwhelmingly positive, highlighting a good learning environment and student welfare services. A small percentage (~14.3%) of feedback mentioned issues with lecture streaming software.

Reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~0% negative feedback. Students praise the free tuition and wide range of masters specializations, highlighting a conducive academic and diverse environment.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating from one review, the university is praised for academic excellence and practical learning. Positive feedback highlights qualified teachers, real-life technical experience, and a safe, motivating campus.

With an average rating of 4.5/5, student feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Reviews highlight convenience and structure in online formats, alongside supportive instructors and career-focused, practical learning.

Rating distribution
5★
0%
23%
0%
43%
29%
100%
50%
4★
100%
69%
100%
43%
57%
0%
50%
3★
0%
8%
0%
0%
14%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
14%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

sense of community, diverse academic programs

At the University of Bremen, I found a vibrant and supportive community that truly fostered my academic growth. The interdisciplinary approach to learning was one of the highlights; collaborating with students from various fields enriched my understanding of complex issues. I particularly enjoyed the campus atmosphere. The mix of modern facilities and green spaces created a welcoming environment for studying and socializing. Engaging with professors who were both approachable and knowledgeable made a significant difference in my educational experience. Their willingness to support research projects and provide mentorship was invaluable. However, navigating some administrative processes could be challenging at times, which required patience and persistence. Overall, I would highly recommend the University of Bremen for its commitment to innovation and student-centered learning. It’s a place where you can develop both academically and personally while making meaningful connections.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close