BI Norwegian Business School - BI vs University of Bergen vs NHH Norwegian School of Economics vs Institute of Management Sciences Peshawar Pakistan vs sebelas maret university
Side-by-side comparison from 32 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Knowledgeable lecturers and strong academic environment
- +Practical approach and industry connections
- +Good location and food variety
- +Excellent academic programs and knowledgeable professors
- +Strong student support services and welfare provisions
- +Vibrant international community and city-integrated campus life
- +Free tuition and diverse program options
- +High quality education and international exchange opportunities
- +Supportive environment and welcoming community
- +Exceptional and inspiring faculty
- +Strong career support and job placement
- +High-quality facilities and management
- +Supportive and friendly community
- +Comprehensive academic programs and facilities
- +Growing international opportunities and administrative improvements
- +Strong focus on engineering and technology
- +Up-to-date teaching and challenging practicals
- +Qualified and patient lecturers
- +Flexible online format and structure
- +Career-focused and practical learning
- +Supportive instructors and engaging lectures
- -Students dislike the lack of proper support and communication from staff.
- -They often complain about outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources.
- -Students express frustration with the curriculum and teaching methods being unengaging or irrelevant.
- -Outdated or problematic lecture streaming software hinders communication with instructors.
- -Administrative and management issues create a frustrating student experience.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a recurring concern.
- -Poor teaching quality and curriculum relevance are often criticized.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistently criticized.
- -Lack of resources and support negatively impacts the learning experience.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
- -Communication breakdowns and lack of support create a negative experience.
- -Excessive administrative burdens and lack of clear communication.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
- -Lack of engaging and relevant curriculum.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Administrative and management issues cause confusion and frustration.
- -Lack of clear communication and support creates a negative student experience.
This institution demonstrates remarkable strengths, with exceptional ratings for its Facilities, Professors, and Location, all scoring an impressive 4.5. Student Life and Internationality also receive solid marks at 4. However, Accommodations and Value emerge as areas needing development, each receiving a lower score of 3.
This institution demonstrates excellent performance, with student life and location receiving the highest marks at approximately 4.43 and 4.33 respectively. Facilities, accommodation, and internationality are all rated a solid 4. Professors represent the weakest area, scoring 3.86. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded experience, with particular strengths in its vibrant student community and convenient setting.
This institution receives exceptionally high marks for its facilities and accommodation, both scoring an outstanding 4.7. Professors and internationality are also strong points, with ratings of 4.4. Student life and value for money are rated at 4.3 and 4.1 respectively. The university's location is its weakest area, though still a respectable 4.1.
This university demonstrates a solid performance, with its strongest areas being Professors (3.75) and a tie across Student Life, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value, all at 3.5. Conversely, Facilities represent the weakest area, scoring 3.25, with Location also scoring a moderate 3. While the academic core is well-regarded, improvements in physical resources could further enhance the overall student experience.
The university demonstrates a commendable academic environment, with Professors and Internationality standing out as exceptional areas at 4.5. Location and Student Life also receive high marks, both at 4.25, alongside a strong Value rating. Facilities represent the weakest area with a score of 3.5, while Accomodation remains solid at 4.
This institution demonstrates remarkable strengths in **Location**, achieving a perfect score, and strong performances in **Value** (4.5) and **Accomodation** and **Professors** (both 4.33). Facilities and Student Life also score well at 4.17. The area requiring the most attention appears to be **Internationality**, with a rating of 3.83.
This institution demonstrates significant strengths in **Professors** and **Internationality**, both receiving top scores of 4.5. **Value** also stands out at a high 4.5. Conversely, **Location** received the lowest rating at 3. The remaining areas of Facilities, Student Life, and Accommodation are rated solidly at 3.5, indicating a generally positive, though not exceptional, experience in these aspects.
With an average rating of 4/5, student feedback is highly positive. Reviewers consistently praise the great location, knowledgeable lecturers, and strong academic environment. Industry connections and a practical approach to education were also highlighted.
With a 4.14/5 average, reviews are overwhelmingly positive, highlighting a good learning environment and student welfare services. A small percentage (~14.3%) of feedback mentioned issues with lecture streaming software.
Reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~0% negative feedback. Students praise the free tuition and wide range of masters specializations, highlighting a conducive academic and diverse environment.
University reviews show overwhelmingly positive sentiment, with ~75% of feedback being highly favorable. Students praise exceptional faculty and strong career support. No negative feedback was recorded.
University feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%), with students praising a comfortable study environment, friendly lectures and staff, and valuable learning experiences. Some note slow administrative services that have improved over time.
With a 4/5 average rating, approximately 100% of reviews are positive. Students commend the institution's technology focus, excellent engineering and technology performance, updated teaching, and challenging practicals.
With an average rating of 4.5/5, student feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Reviews highlight convenience and structure in online formats, alongside supportive instructors and career-focused, practical learning.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show