BI Norwegian Business School - BI vs Vienna University of Economics and Business vs University of Notre Dame vs University of Bergen vs NHH Norwegian School of Economics

Side-by-side comparison from 38 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Western Norway University of Applied Sciences (4.50)
BI Norwegian Business School - BI: wins 0/6 categories
Vienna University of Economics and Business: wins 0/6 categories
University of Notre Dame: wins 3/6 categories
University of Bergen: wins 1/6 categories
NHH Norwegian School of Economics: wins 2/6 categories
Kafr El-Sheikh University - KFS: wins 0/6 categories
Western Norway University of Applied Sciences: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: B.Sc. in International Business Administration
Best programme: Business Administration and Economics
Notre Dame, United States
4.40
Read more reviews
9 reviews
×
Best programme: Economics
Best programme: Biomedical Sciences
Best programme: Economics and Finance
Best programme: Archaeology
Best programme: Engineering
Category ratings
Facilities
4.50
4.13
4.33
4.00
4.71
Win
3.67
3.50
Location
4.50
4.50
4.50
4.33
4.14
4.33
3.00
Professors
4.50
4.13
4.67
Win
3.86
4.43
4.00
4.50
Internationality
4.00
4.25
4.67
Win
4.00
4.43
3.00
4.50
Student life
4.00
3.38
3.89
4.43
Win
4.29
4.00
3.50
Value
3.00
3.75
4.78
Win
4.14
4.14
4.00
4.50
Accommodation
3.00
3.63
4.14
4.00
4.71
Win
3.33
3.50
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Knowledgeable lecturers and strong academic environment
  • +Practical approach and industry connections
  • +Good location and food variety
  • +Excellent campus facilities and diverse program options.
  • +Supportive faculty and staff providing accurate assistance.
  • +Opportunities for specialized study and international experiences.
  • +Supportive and welcoming environment for personal growth and belonging
  • +Rigorous academics with high-caliber professors fostering critical thinking and career skills
  • +Strong sense of school pride and vibrant social life
  • +Excellent academic programs and knowledgeable professors
  • +Strong student support services and welfare provisions
  • +Vibrant international community and city-integrated campus life
  • +Free tuition and diverse program options
  • +High quality education and international exchange opportunities
  • +Supportive environment and welcoming community
  • +Strong practical training and skill development.
  • +Well-established programs and scientific subjects.
  • +Access to modern facilities and resources.
  • +Flexible online format and structure
  • +Career-focused and practical learning
  • +Supportive instructors and engaging lectures
Cons
  • -Students dislike the lack of proper support and communication from staff.
  • -They often complain about outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources.
  • -Students express frustration with the curriculum and teaching methods being unengaging or irrelevant.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources negatively impact the learning experience.
  • -Lack of clear communication and student support is a recurring problem.
  • -Inconsistent and unresponsive administrative support.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Lack of clear communication and academic guidance.
  • -Outdated or problematic lecture streaming software hinders communication with instructors.
  • -Administrative and management issues create a frustrating student experience.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a recurring concern.
  • -Poor teaching quality and curriculum relevance are often criticized.
  • -Lack of clarity and organization in course structure and communication.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources for learning.
  • -Administrative and management issues causing frustration and delays.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause confusion and frustration.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support creates a negative student experience.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates remarkable strengths, with exceptional ratings for its Facilities, Professors, and Location, all scoring an impressive 4.5. Student Life and Internationality also receive solid marks at 4. However, Accommodations and Value emerge as areas needing development, each receiving a lower score of 3.

Across various aspects, this institution receives commendations in several key areas. Its **location stands out** as the highest-rated category, complemented by strong scores in **Internationality, Facilities, and Professors**. However, **Student Life is identified as the weakest area**, with Accomodation and Value also receiving moderate ratings.

This institution garners particularly high marks for its Value, with an impressive score of 4.78. Professors and Internationality are also areas of significant strength, both receiving a 4.67 rating. Conversely, Student Life received the lowest rating at 3.89, indicating it is the area with the most room for improvement. Other aspects like Facilities, Location, and Accomodation are rated favorably.

This institution demonstrates excellent performance, with student life and location receiving the highest marks at approximately 4.43 and 4.33 respectively. Facilities, accommodation, and internationality are all rated a solid 4. Professors represent the weakest area, scoring 3.86. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded experience, with particular strengths in its vibrant student community and convenient setting.

This institution receives exceptionally high marks for its facilities and accommodation, both scoring an outstanding 4.7. Professors and internationality are also strong points, with ratings of 4.4. Student life and value for money are rated at 4.3 and 4.1 respectively. The university's location is its weakest area, though still a respectable 4.1.

Analyzing the provided ratings, the university excels in its **location**, receiving a strong 4.33. Professors and student life are also highly rated at 4.0. The weakest areas are **internationality** (3.0) and accommodation (3.33). Facilities score a respectable 3.67, with value also at 4.0.

This institution demonstrates significant strengths in **Professors** and **Internationality**, both receiving top scores of 4.5. **Value** also stands out at a high 4.5. Conversely, **Location** received the lowest rating at 3. The remaining areas of Facilities, Student Life, and Accommodation are rated solidly at 3.5, indicating a generally positive, though not exceptional, experience in these aspects.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4/5, student feedback is highly positive. Reviewers consistently praise the great location, knowledgeable lecturers, and strong academic environment. Industry connections and a practical approach to education were also highlighted.

With an average rating of 4.13/5 from 8 reviews, ~88% of feedback is positive, praising the campus, program variety, and support. Negative feedback is minimal, representing ~0% of all comments.

All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.44/5. Students highlight a welcoming environment, opportunities for personal growth, and strong academic preparation.

With a 4.14/5 average, reviews are overwhelmingly positive, highlighting a good learning environment and student welfare services. A small percentage (~14.3%) of feedback mentioned issues with lecture streaming software.

Reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~0% negative feedback. Students praise the free tuition and wide range of masters specializations, highlighting a conducive academic and diverse environment.

With ~67% positive feedback, reviewers praise the university for community, scientific subjects, practical training, and skill development for the job market. One review mentions access to modern facilities and resources.

With an average rating of 4.5/5, student feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Reviews highlight convenience and structure in online formats, alongside supportive instructors and career-focused, practical learning.

Rating distribution
5★
0%
38%
44%
43%
29%
0%
50%
4★
100%
38%
56%
43%
57%
67%
50%
3★
0%
25%
0%
0%
14%
33%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
14%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Get prepared for WU

WU (German abbreviation derived from Wirtschaftsuniversität) is one of the best universities in Europe. One of the main aims of the university for the next years is to increase the number of international students. That is why they introduces a program fully in English. During the first application period the university received more than 1000 applications for only 120 places. I study at the German Bachelor's Program. It has three stages - STEOP, CBK and Hauptstudium. Every student who has chosen BWl/IBWL/WINF can specialize in 2 subjects. Most of the exams are standardized and there are enough materials for preparation. For some subjects there are even additional courses organized from ÖH (the student organization). There are special mentor programs, so take a look at ALL OF THEM even before applying to the university. You will be amazed how much the university supports its students. The administration is amazing. They always answer very fast and their answers are really helpful. If you want to work something connected with R or Data Science, this is your university. The campus is pretty new and really modern. In Vienna there are a lot of DISCOUNTS FOR STUDENTS AND PRESENTS during the WHOLE SEMESTER. Bank accounts are free of charge. You even may receive a bonus for opening a student bank account in Austria.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close