Gadjah Mada University - UGM vs Islamic University of Indonesia - UII vs University of Sanata Dharma vs Duta Wacana Christian University - DWCU vs Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Yogyakarta

Side-by-side comparison from 41 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Gadjah Mada University - UGM: wins 0/1 categories
Islamic University of Indonesia - UII: wins 0/1 categories
University of Sanata Dharma: wins 0/1 categories
Duta Wacana Christian University - DWCU: wins 0/1 categories
Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Yogyakarta: wins 0/1 categories
Yogyakarta State University - UNY: wins 0/1 categories
SMKN 6 Yogyakarta: wins 1/1 categories
Comparing
Yogyakarta, Indonesia
4.60
Read more reviews
30 reviews
×
Best programme: BSc Psychology
Best programme: Accounting
Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: International Relations
Best programme: Administration
Yogyakarta, Indonesia
5.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Tourism
Category ratings
Facilities
4.30
4.83
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
5.00
5.00
Location
4.59
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
5.00
5.00
Professors
4.57
4.67
Not rated
Not rated
4.33
5.00
5.00
Internationality
4.17
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
4.67
5.00
5.00
Student life
4.50
4.67
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
5.00
5.00
Value
4.63
4.67
Not rated
Not rated
4.67
5.00
5.00
Accommodation
4.20
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
4.33
Not rated
5.00
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong academic reputation and faculty support
  • +Vibrant student community and campus culture
  • +Commitment to people's values and social responsibility
  • +Excellent, well-maintained facilities and up-to-date learning resources
  • +Inspiring and cooperative lecturers with comfortable classrooms
  • +Supportive Islamic environment promoting harmony and tolerance

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Engaging curriculum with practical applications
  • +Diverse extracurriculars and organizations
  • +Supportive academic environment
  • +Practical, relevant curriculum
  • +Experienced and knowledgeable lecturers
  • +Focus on in-demand professional skills
  • +Hands-on practical learning
  • +Supportive and helpful teachers
  • +Good facilities and resources
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a common complaint.
  • -Unengaging teaching methods and a perceived lack of relevance in coursework are disliked.
  • -Unresponsive and unhelpful administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment.
  • -Lack of clear communication and organization.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are common complaints.
  • -Lack of essential resources and support negatively impacts learning.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support are prevalent.
  • -Administrative and management issues are frequent frustrations.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a common complaint.
  • -Lack of resources and support negatively impacts the learning experience.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution garners strong marks across most categories, with **Location** and **Value** standing out as particular strengths at 4.59 and 4.63 respectively. **Professors** also receive high praise. The weakest area appears to be **Internationality**, rated at 4.17, though this still represents a solid score. Facilities and accommodation also scored well, indicating a generally positive student experience.

This university garners excellent ratings across key aspects. Facilities stand out as the strongest area, achieving a near-perfect score. Professors, student life, and perceived value are also highly regarded. Location, accommodation, and internationality are consistently rated well, though slightly lower than the top-performing categories. Overall, the institution presents a very positive and well-rounded profile.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

An excellent overall profile emerges from these university ratings. The institution excels in **Location** and **Student Life**, both receiving perfect scores. **Internationality** and **Value** are also exceptionally strong areas, marked by high marks. In contrast, **Facilities** is the weakest aspect, though still rated positively. **Professors** and **Accomodation** also demonstrate very solid performance.

This institution garners exceptionally high ratings across the majority of surveyed categories, excelling particularly in Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Internationality, and Value, all receiving perfect scores. The sole area requiring significant attention is Accomodation, which received a zero rating, indicating a substantial deficiency in this aspect.

This institution receives perfect scores across all evaluated metrics. Its facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value are all rated a 5 out of 5. There are no discernible weak areas; every aspect surveyed meets the highest possible standard.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Approximately 93% of reviews are positive, praising the university's strong academic reputation, excellent faculty, vibrant community, and social responsibility. No negative feedback was provided.

All six reviews are positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students frequently praise the excellent facilities, including journal access and technology resources. Lecturers are described as kind, fun, cooperative, and inspiring.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Students report an enriching and pleasant experience, highlighting strong academic programs and numerous extracurricular opportunities. The supportive environment and diverse studies are frequently praised, with minimal mention of less-than-ideal facilities.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight a well-structured curriculum and experienced lecturers offering practical, relevant learning. No negative feedback was provided.

The single review is highly positive, with a 5/5 average rating. It highlights extensive learning, enjoyable hands-on practice, and helpful, nice teachers.

Rating distribution
5★
70%
100%
0%
0%
33%
100%
100%
4★
23%
0%
0%
0%
67%
0%
0%
3★
7%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Quality comes at a price

Being a student at UII seems to be a matter of prestige because the tuition fees are quite expensive. However, the supporting facilities and teaching materials make the word "price" completely irrelevant. Supporting facilities such as international journals, free accounts to access Microsoft Offices, Spotify, computer lab space and WiFi with fairly fast speeds are provided. Teaching materials are always of international standard with case studies that increase knowledge at every class meeting. It's not just about learning activities, but facilities to support student creativity such as a podcast room, filming equipment, content studio, and editing software are also provided.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close