Universidad Cristiana de las Asambleas de Dios - UCAD vs University of Brawijaya - UB vs Muhamadiyah Malang University - UMM vs Instituto Federal do Rio Grande do Sul vs State University of Malang - UM

Side-by-side comparison from 35 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Universidad Cristiana de las Asambleas de Dios - UCAD: wins 0/0 categories
University of Brawijaya - UB: wins 0/0 categories
Muhamadiyah Malang University - UMM: wins 0/0 categories
Instituto Federal do Rio Grande do Sul: wins 0/0 categories
State University of Malang - UM: wins 0/0 categories
Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta University - UMY: wins 0/0 categories
Maulana Malik Ibrahim State Islamic University Malang - UIN Malang: wins 0/0 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Psychology
Best programme: International Relations
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: English Language Teaching
Best programme: Information and Communication Systems Engineering
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
4.16
4.00
Not rated
4.17
5.00
5.00
Location
Not rated
4.64
5.00
Not rated
5.00
5.00
5.00
Professors
Not rated
4.36
5.00
Not rated
4.67
5.00
5.00
Internationality
Not rated
4.20
5.00
Not rated
3.83
5.00
5.00
Student life
Not rated
4.56
5.00
Not rated
4.60
5.00
5.00
Value
Not rated
4.40
5.00
Not rated
4.67
5.00
5.00
Accommodation
Not rated
4.29
4.00
Not rated
4.33
5.00
5.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Positive and supportive study environment
  • +Helpful and cooperative students and teachers
  • +Supportive, knowledgeable, and approachable lecturers
  • +Comfortable, well-equipped, and inspiring learning environments
  • +Vibrant student life and opportunities for growth
  • +Rigorous thesis and journal preparation is highly valued.
  • +Effective supervisor guidance during the RTHI class is appreciated.
  • +Some system complexities exist, causing repeated revisions.

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive and inspiring faculty
  • +Affordable cost of living and study
  • +Positive and student-friendly city environment
  • +Practical curriculum and knowledgeable faculty
  • +Collaborative environment and modern facilities
  • +Valuable career services support
  • +International curriculum with unique Islamic integration
  • +Different academic system compared to other universities
Cons
  • -Poor communication and unclear expectations from administration.
  • -Inadequate and outdated facilities and resources.
  • -Lack of support and feeling overwhelmed by workload.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring problem.
  • -Inadequate administrative support and unclear management.
  • -Outdated facilities and limited resources for learning.
  • -Lack of practical application and career preparation.

Nothing to show

  • -Inadequate and poorly maintained facilities, especially restrooms.
  • -Insufficient parking availability.
  • -Inefficient administrative processes.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment are a recurring complaint.
  • -Lack of necessary resources and support is a significant drawback.
  • -Administrative & management issues
  • -Outdated facilities
  • -Lack of resources & support
Rating summary
What students say

This institution presents a uniform rating of zero across all surveyed categories. Consequently, there are no standout strengths or discernible weaknesses to highlight. The university's performance is consistently low in areas such as facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value. This suggests a critical need for comprehensive review and improvement across every facet of the university experience.

This institution garners strong approval across multiple facets. Its location is particularly well-regarded, alongside a vibrant student life and good value for money. Accommodation and internationality also receive favorable scores. While professors are highly rated, facilities represent the lowest, though still solid, area of assessment.

Across numerous aspects, this institution demonstrates outstanding strengths. Professors, location, student life, internationality, and value all achieved perfect scores, indicating exceptional experiences in these areas. Facilities and accommodation, while still strong, represent the comparatively weaker aspects with a rating of four.

Nothing to show

This institution receives very strong marks in several key areas, notably Professors and Value, both scoring an impressive 4.67. Student Life also garners significant praise at 4.6. Location stands out as a perfect 5. Facilities and Accomodation are rated well, around 4.17 and 4.33 respectively. The area with the lowest rating is Internationality, at 3.83.

Exceptional marks were awarded across all evaluated aspects. The university achieved a perfect score of 5 out of 5 in every category, including facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value. This indicates a uniformly outstanding experience with no specific areas requiring improvement or standing out as significantly stronger than others.

Outstanding scores define this institution across every evaluated aspect. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value all received a perfect 5 out of 5. This indicates a remarkably well-rounded and highly satisfactory university experience with no discernible weak points.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With one review, the average rating is 4/5. The feedback highlights a positive study environment and helpful interactions between students and teachers.

With a 4.72 average rating, reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100% of feedback). Students highlight inspiring learning spaces, supportive academic environments, and vibrant student life as key strengths.

With one review, the average rating is 5/5, indicating overwhelmingly positive sentiment. The single positive comment found the RTHI class helpful for thesis and journal preparation but noted system intricacies regarding supervisor revisions.

Nothing to show

~83% of reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable and supportive lecturers, and a nurturing learning environment. Some students also highlight affordable living costs and a green, well-maintained campus. A small portion (~17%) of negative feedback points to inadequate facilities, including poor-quality toilets and a lack of parking.

With a single review, the student experience is rated a perfect 5/5, indicating overwhelmingly positive feedback. This suggests a highly satisfactory educational environment.

The single review is overwhelmingly positive, with a 5/5 average rating. It praises the international standard curriculum and unique integration of Islamic perspectives in courses.

Rating distribution
5★
0%
72%
100%
0%
83%
100%
100%
4★
100%
28%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
17%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Good Campus

Life at Universitas Brawijaya is quite dynamic and diverse. Students have the opportunity to get involved in various extracurricular activities, such as student organizations, clubs, and campus events. These activities provide additional experiences that are useful and enrich campus life. Universitas Brawijaya offers various facilities that support academic and non-academic activities.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close