Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam Technical University - UPTU vs University of Brawijaya - UB vs Muhamadiyah Malang University - UMM vs University of Life Sciences in Lublin - UP Lublin vs State University of Malang - UM
Side-by-side comparison from 52 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical, industry-focused curriculum and hands-on project building
- +Strong faculty guidance and support for learning
- +Positive campus environment, good culture, and excellent placement opportunities
- +Supportive, knowledgeable, and approachable lecturers
- +Comfortable, well-equipped, and inspiring learning environments
- +Vibrant student life and opportunities for growth
- +Rigorous thesis and journal preparation is highly valued.
- +Effective supervisor guidance during the RTHI class is appreciated.
- +Some system complexities exist, causing repeated revisions.
- +Strong emphasis on practical skills alongside theoretical knowledge.
- +Professional, supportive, and approachable lecturers.
- +Well-organized campus with good accommodation and a friendly atmosphere.
- +Supportive and inspiring faculty
- +Affordable cost of living and study
- +Positive and student-friendly city environment
- +International curriculum with unique Islamic integration
- +Different academic system compared to other universities
- +Beautiful and well-structured campus
- +Friendly and knowledgeable teachers
- +Engaging teaching style
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant problem.
- -Outdated facilities and poor campus conditions are frequently mentioned.
- -Lack of clear communication and support for students is a recurring concern.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring problem.
- -Inadequate administrative support and unclear management.
- -Outdated facilities and limited resources for learning.
- -Lack of practical application and career preparation.
- -Administrative & management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support are recurring problems.
- -Inadequate and poorly maintained facilities, especially restrooms.
- -Insufficient parking availability.
- -Inefficient administrative processes.
- -Administrative & management issues
- -Outdated facilities
- -Lack of resources & support
- -Administrative & management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning experiences.
- -Lack of clear communication and support leads to student dissatisfaction.
This university's ratings showcase a generally positive student experience. Location stands out as the strongest area, while Internationality received the lowest score. Facilities, Student Life, and Accommodation were all rated well, falling within a similar range. Professors and Value also received solid, mid-range scores, indicating areas for potential improvement alongside existing strengths.
This institution garners strong approval across multiple facets. Its location is particularly well-regarded, alongside a vibrant student life and good value for money. Accommodation and internationality also receive favorable scores. While professors are highly rated, facilities represent the lowest, though still solid, area of assessment.
Across numerous aspects, this institution demonstrates outstanding strengths. Professors, location, student life, internationality, and value all achieved perfect scores, indicating exceptional experiences in these areas. Facilities and accommodation, while still strong, represent the comparatively weaker aspects with a rating of four.
This institution garners excellent marks, particularly excelling in its **Location**, which achieved a perfect score. **Accommodations** and **Facilities** also stood out with very high ratings. Areas receiving solid, though slightly lower, scores include **Student Life** and **Value**, both rated at 4.375. Performance in **Professors** and **Internationality** was rated at 4.25, representing the weakest, yet still strong, aspects of the university experience.
This institution receives very strong marks in several key areas, notably Professors and Value, both scoring an impressive 4.67. Student Life also garners significant praise at 4.6. Location stands out as a perfect 5. Facilities and Accomodation are rated well, around 4.17 and 4.33 respectively. The area with the lowest rating is Internationality, at 3.83.
Outstanding scores define this institution across every evaluated aspect. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value all received a perfect 5 out of 5. This indicates a remarkably well-rounded and highly satisfactory university experience with no discernible weak points.
Outstanding marks were received for facilities, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value, all scoring a perfect 5. Professors also received a solid rating of 4. The location is the area with the lowest score, at 3, indicating it's the weakest aspect of the university's offerings.
~90% of reviews are positive, highlighting rewarding experiences, practical curricula, and supportive faculty. ~10% of reviews express dissatisfaction, with one mentioning issues like mark sheet errors.
With a 4.72 average rating, reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100% of feedback). Students highlight inspiring learning spaces, supportive academic environments, and vibrant student life as key strengths.
With one review, the average rating is 5/5, indicating overwhelmingly positive sentiment. The single positive comment found the RTHI class helpful for thesis and journal preparation but noted system intricacies regarding supervisor revisions.
Reviews are predominantly positive (~75%), highlighting a high standard of teaching with ample practical experience and knowledge. Students also appreciate the diversity of courses, extracurriculars, and supportive atmosphere. No negative feedback was reported.
~83% of reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable and supportive lecturers, and a nurturing learning environment. Some students also highlight affordable living costs and a green, well-maintained campus. A small portion (~17%) of negative feedback points to inadequate facilities, including poor-quality toilets and a lack of parking.
The single review is overwhelmingly positive, with a 5/5 average rating. It praises the international standard curriculum and unique integration of Islamic perspectives in courses.
The single review is highly positive, with a 5/5 rating. Recurring themes highlight a beautiful and well-structured campus, along with friendly and knowledgeable teachers who make lectures enjoyable.
Nothing to show
Life at Universitas Brawijaya is quite dynamic and diverse. Students have the opportunity to get involved in various extracurricular activities, such as student organizations, clubs, and campus events. These activities provide additional experiences that are useful and enrich campus life. Universitas Brawijaya offers various facilities that support academic and non-academic activities.
Nothing to show
Interesting place. If you are interested in "nature-related" studies, that shouldn't be a bad choice. I am from veterinary medicine and everything there is average: average teachers, average program, average methods. Of course, there are some motivated teachers, who will try to give you the most of them but is better to keep your expectations not too high. If you are highly motivated to "dig deep" it should be easier for you. Besides that, there is a very good student exchange program (Erasmus) so you can travel easily with a pretty good scholarship. Same if you want to come there as an Erasmus, you shouldn't be disappointed. Good location in the city center, the city is relatively cheap by itself which is great for students.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show