Gadjah Mada University - UGM vs Ahmad Dahlan University - UAD vs Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta University - UMY vs Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Yogyakarta vs Yogyakarta State University - UNY
Side-by-side comparison from 40 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Strong academic reputation and faculty support
- +Vibrant student community and campus culture
- +Commitment to people's values and social responsibility
- +Excellent academic foundation and personal growth opportunities.
- +Supportive and dynamic lecturer-student interaction.
- +Strong Islamic religious curriculum alongside formal education.
- +Practical curriculum and knowledgeable faculty
- +Collaborative environment and modern facilities
- +Valuable career services support
- +Engaging curriculum with practical applications
- +Diverse extracurriculars and organizations
- +Supportive academic environment
- +Practical, relevant curriculum
- +Experienced and knowledgeable lecturers
- +Focus on in-demand professional skills
Nothing to show
- +Hands-on practical learning
- +Supportive and helpful teachers
- +Good facilities and resources
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a common complaint.
- -Unengaging teaching methods and a perceived lack of relevance in coursework are disliked.
- -Students are frustrated by administrative inefficiencies and poor management.
- -There is widespread dissatisfaction with outdated facilities and a lack of resources.
- -Course content and teaching methods are often perceived as irrelevant or unengaging.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a recurring complaint.
- -Lack of necessary resources and support is a significant drawback.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are common complaints.
- -Lack of essential resources and support negatively impacts learning.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support are prevalent.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues are frequent frustrations.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a common complaint.
- -Lack of resources and support negatively impacts the learning experience.
This institution garners strong marks across most categories, with **Location** and **Value** standing out as particular strengths at 4.59 and 4.63 respectively. **Professors** also receive high praise. The weakest area appears to be **Internationality**, rated at 4.17, though this still represents a solid score. Facilities and accommodation also scored well, indicating a generally positive student experience.
An institution demonstrates considerable strengths in its facilities, professors, and international appeal, all receiving a high 4.5 rating. Student life and location also score well at 4.25. However, the university's value proposition registers as a comparative weakness, with a rating of 3.5, while accommodation sits at a respectable 4.
Exceptional marks were awarded across all evaluated aspects. The university achieved a perfect score of 5 out of 5 in every category, including facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value. This indicates a uniformly outstanding experience with no specific areas requiring improvement or standing out as significantly stronger than others.
An excellent overall profile emerges from these university ratings. The institution excels in **Location** and **Student Life**, both receiving perfect scores. **Internationality** and **Value** are also exceptionally strong areas, marked by high marks. In contrast, **Facilities** is the weakest aspect, though still rated positively. **Professors** and **Accomodation** also demonstrate very solid performance.
This institution garners exceptionally high ratings across the majority of surveyed categories, excelling particularly in Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Internationality, and Value, all receiving perfect scores. The sole area requiring significant attention is Accomodation, which received a zero rating, indicating a substantial deficiency in this aspect.
Nothing to show
This institution receives perfect scores across all evaluated metrics. Its facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value are all rated a 5 out of 5. There are no discernible weak areas; every aspect surveyed meets the highest possible standard.
Approximately 93% of reviews are positive, praising the university's strong academic reputation, excellent faculty, vibrant community, and social responsibility. No negative feedback was provided.
With 100% positive reviews, students report transformative experiences and strong academic/personal growth. They highlight enjoyable studies, effective teaching, and dynamic lecturer-student interaction.
With a single review, the student experience is rated a perfect 5/5, indicating overwhelmingly positive feedback. This suggests a highly satisfactory educational environment.
Students report an enriching and pleasant experience, highlighting strong academic programs and numerous extracurricular opportunities. The supportive environment and diverse studies are frequently praised, with minimal mention of less-than-ideal facilities.
With a perfect 5/5 average rating, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight a well-structured curriculum and experienced lecturers offering practical, relevant learning. No negative feedback was provided.
Nothing to show
The single review is highly positive, with a 5/5 average rating. It highlights extensive learning, enjoyable hands-on practice, and helpful, nice teachers.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show