Gadjah Mada University - UGM vs Islamic University of Indonesia - UII vs University of Sanata Dharma vs Indonesian Nuclear Technology Polytechnic - Poltek Nuklir vs Yogyakarta State University - UNY
Side-by-side comparison from 41 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Strong academic reputation and faculty support
- +Vibrant student community and campus culture
- +Commitment to people's values and social responsibility
- +Excellent, well-maintained facilities and up-to-date learning resources
- +Inspiring and cooperative lecturers with comfortable classrooms
- +Supportive Islamic environment promoting harmony and tolerance
Nothing to show
- +Strong academic programs in nuclear technology
- +Student-friendly environment in Yogyakarta
- +Excellent laboratory facilities
- +Practical, relevant curriculum
- +Experienced and knowledgeable lecturers
- +Focus on in-demand professional skills
Nothing to show
- +Flexible online learning for professionals
- +Comprehensive and applicable curriculum
- +Seamless balance of career and study
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a common complaint.
- -Unengaging teaching methods and a perceived lack of relevance in coursework are disliked.
- -Unresponsive and unhelpful administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment.
- -Lack of clear communication and organization.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Ineffective or unengaging teaching methods are a common complaint.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support are prevalent.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
This institution garners strong marks across most categories, with **Location** and **Value** standing out as particular strengths at 4.59 and 4.63 respectively. **Professors** also receive high praise. The weakest area appears to be **Internationality**, rated at 4.17, though this still represents a solid score. Facilities and accommodation also scored well, indicating a generally positive student experience.
This university garners excellent ratings across key aspects. Facilities stand out as the strongest area, achieving a near-perfect score. Professors, student life, and perceived value are also highly regarded. Location, accommodation, and internationality are consistently rated well, though slightly lower than the top-performing categories. Overall, the institution presents a very positive and well-rounded profile.
Nothing to show
Offering a well-rounded experience, this institution shines particularly brightly in the areas of **Professors** and **Location**, both receiving top marks. Student life and accommodation are also highly rated, suggesting a positive campus environment. Areas for potential improvement include facilities and internationality, which received moderate scores. The overall value proposition appears strong.
This institution garners exceptionally high ratings across the majority of surveyed categories, excelling particularly in Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Internationality, and Value, all receiving perfect scores. The sole area requiring significant attention is Accomodation, which received a zero rating, indicating a substantial deficiency in this aspect.
Nothing to show
Exceptional performance marks this university's ratings, with perfect scores in Facilities, Professors, and Internationality, alongside a high 5 for Value. Student Life also received a commendable 4.67. The areas with the lowest scores, though still strong, were Location and Accommodation, both rated at 4.33.
Approximately 93% of reviews are positive, praising the university's strong academic reputation, excellent faculty, vibrant community, and social responsibility. No negative feedback was provided.
All six reviews are positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students frequently praise the excellent facilities, including journal access and technology resources. Lecturers are described as kind, fun, cooperative, and inspiring.
Nothing to show
With a perfect 5/5 average rating and 100% positive feedback, this university garners high praise for its student-friendly environment and strong academic programs. Positive comments highlight excellent laboratory facilities and specialized nuclear-related education.
With a perfect 5/5 average rating, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight a well-structured curriculum and experienced lecturers offering practical, relevant learning. No negative feedback was provided.
Nothing to show
All 3 reviews are highly positive, averaging 5/5 stars. Students praise the intuitive, flexible digital infrastructure and seamless integration of studies with professional lives. The curriculum is described as comprehensive and applicable.
Nothing to show
Being a student at UII seems to be a matter of prestige because the tuition fees are quite expensive. However, the supporting facilities and teaching materials make the word "price" completely irrelevant. Supporting facilities such as international journals, free accounts to access Microsoft Offices, Spotify, computer lab space and WiFi with fairly fast speeds are provided. Teaching materials are always of international standard with case studies that increase knowledge at every class meeting. It's not just about learning activities, but facilities to support student creativity such as a podcast room, filming equipment, content studio, and editing software are also provided.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show