Gadjah Mada University - UGM vs STIKes Madani vs Indonesian Nuclear Technology Polytechnic - Poltek Nuklir vs Duta Wacana Christian University - DWCU vs Yogyakarta State University - UNY
Side-by-side comparison from 37 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Strong academic reputation and faculty support
- +Vibrant student community and campus culture
- +Commitment to people's values and social responsibility
- +Islamic integration with healthcare courses
- +Quranic memorization and Arabic language requirements
- +Strong academic programs in nuclear technology
- +Student-friendly environment in Yogyakarta
- +Excellent laboratory facilities
Nothing to show
- +Practical, relevant curriculum
- +Experienced and knowledgeable lecturers
- +Focus on in-demand professional skills
- +Hands-on practical learning
- +Supportive and helpful teachers
- +Good facilities and resources
- +Flexible online learning for professionals
- +Comprehensive and applicable curriculum
- +Seamless balance of career and study
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a common complaint.
- -Unengaging teaching methods and a perceived lack of relevance in coursework are disliked.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and technology are a consistent concern.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is frustrating for students.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Ineffective or unengaging teaching methods are a common complaint.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support are prevalent.
- -Administrative and management issues are frequent frustrations.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a common complaint.
- -Lack of resources and support negatively impacts the learning experience.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
This institution garners strong marks across most categories, with **Location** and **Value** standing out as particular strengths at 4.59 and 4.63 respectively. **Professors** also receive high praise. The weakest area appears to be **Internationality**, rated at 4.17, though this still represents a solid score. Facilities and accommodation also scored well, indicating a generally positive student experience.
This institution receives excellent marks for its professors and overall value, both earning a perfect score. Facilities, location, student life, and accommodation are also strong, each rated at a solid four. Internationality is the area with the lowest rating, coming in at a three. This indicates a generally positive experience with notable strengths in teaching quality and affordability.
Offering a well-rounded experience, this institution shines particularly brightly in the areas of **Professors** and **Location**, both receiving top marks. Student life and accommodation are also highly rated, suggesting a positive campus environment. Areas for potential improvement include facilities and internationality, which received moderate scores. The overall value proposition appears strong.
Nothing to show
This institution garners exceptionally high ratings across the majority of surveyed categories, excelling particularly in Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Internationality, and Value, all receiving perfect scores. The sole area requiring significant attention is Accomodation, which received a zero rating, indicating a substantial deficiency in this aspect.
This institution receives perfect scores across all evaluated metrics. Its facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value are all rated a 5 out of 5. There are no discernible weak areas; every aspect surveyed meets the highest possible standard.
Exceptional performance marks this university's ratings, with perfect scores in Facilities, Professors, and Internationality, alongside a high 5 for Value. Student Life also received a commendable 4.67. The areas with the lowest scores, though still strong, were Location and Accommodation, both rated at 4.33.
Approximately 93% of reviews are positive, praising the university's strong academic reputation, excellent faculty, vibrant community, and social responsibility. No negative feedback was provided.
With one review, the average rating is 4/5. Positive feedback (100%) highlights programs that integrate Islamic learning with academic courses like midwifery, nursing, and pharmacy, including mandatory Quran memorization and Arabic language.
With a perfect 5/5 average rating and 100% positive feedback, this university garners high praise for its student-friendly environment and strong academic programs. Positive comments highlight excellent laboratory facilities and specialized nuclear-related education.
Nothing to show
With a perfect 5/5 average rating, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight a well-structured curriculum and experienced lecturers offering practical, relevant learning. No negative feedback was provided.
The single review is highly positive, with a 5/5 average rating. It highlights extensive learning, enjoyable hands-on practice, and helpful, nice teachers.
All 3 reviews are highly positive, averaging 5/5 stars. Students praise the intuitive, flexible digital infrastructure and seamless integration of studies with professional lives. The curriculum is described as comprehensive and applicable.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show