London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs Edinburgh Napier University vs University of Hull vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie vs University of Wolverhampton Business School

Side-by-side comparison from 473 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: University of Wolverhampton (4.40)
London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE: wins 2/7 categories
Edinburgh Napier University: wins 1/7 categories
University of Hull: wins 0/7 categories
EM Normandie - EM Normandie: wins 0/7 categories
University of Wolverhampton Business School: wins 1/7 categories
University of Wolverhampton: wins 3/7 categories
Jellyfish Training: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Economics
Edinburgh, The United Kingdom
4.10
Read more reviews
47 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Management
Hull, The United Kingdom
4.00
Read more reviews
72 reviews
×
Best programme: Advertising and Marketing
Best programme: MSc International Logistics and Port Management
Wolverhampton, The United Kingdom
4.30
Read more reviews
7 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Administration in Management
Wolverhampton, The United Kingdom
4.40
Top
Read more reviews
18 reviews
×
Best programme: Biomedical Science
London, The United Kingdom
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.04
4.31
Win
4.19
4.00
3.50
4.19
Not rated
Location
4.78
Win
4.18
3.81
3.57
4.14
3.94
Not rated
Professors
4.26
4.18
3.97
4.00
4.43
4.44
Win
Not rated
Internationality
4.80
Win
4.15
3.86
4.14
3.86
4.06
Not rated
Student life
3.63
4.18
3.89
3.71
3.29
4.38
Win
Not rated
Value
4.04
4.03
3.89
4.00
3.86
4.22
Win
Not rated
Accommodation
3.78
3.67
3.59
3.50
3.86
Win
3.60
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Expert and experienced faculty
  • +Supportive and collaborative community atmosphere
  • +Diverse and flexible learning and assessment methods
  • +Industry-focused curriculum with practical skills
  • +Supportive and approachable faculty
  • +Well-structured programs and learning environment
  • +Strong academic support and tailored programs
  • +Vibrant campus life and facilities
  • +Balance of theory and practical application
  • +Connecting theory to practice through real-world cases.
  • +Diverse international environment and global opportunities.
  • +Relevant industry-focused courses and knowledgeable faculty.
  • +Interactive, knowledgeable, and supportive lecturers
  • +Relevant, contemporary course content
  • +Strong preparation for future careers
  • +Strong student support and inclusive environment.
  • +High-quality teaching and knowledgeable lecturers.
  • +Relevant courses and career preparation.

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Poor teaching quality and lack of structure in academic programs.
  • -Inadequate support services and limited social opportunities.
  • -High fees with perceived low value and administrative issues.
  • -Unapproachable and neglectful lecturers.
  • -Administrative and management issues.
  • -Ethical concerns regarding the law department's affiliations and invited speakers.
  • -Perceived corruption and human rights violations associated with university partnerships.
  • -Negative impact on the university's reputation and the student experience.
  • -Perceived as a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is a problem.
  • -Unreasonable payment deadlines conflicting with student finance release.
  • -Poor communication and unclear financial expectations.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Perceived strengths of this institution lie significantly in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both receiving top marks. Conversely, **Student Life** emerges as the area with the lowest reported satisfaction. Ratings for Facilities, Professors, Accomodation, and Value fall within a moderate to good range, indicating generally positive feedback across these aspects.

This institution achieves strong scores in several key areas, notably in **Facilities**, which stands out with the highest rating. Student life and location also received commendations, alongside professors and internationality, all scoring above 4.0. The weakest area highlighted is **Accommodation**, receiving the lowest rating among the surveyed categories. Overall, the university presents a generally positive picture, with room for improvement in its housing provisions.

The surveyed university demonstrates its strongest performance in **Facilities**, earning a high rating. Conversely, **Accomodation** received the lowest score among the assessed categories. Other areas like Professors, Location, Student Life, Internationality, and Value all fall within a generally positive mid-range, suggesting a well-rounded educational experience with specific room for improvement in living arrangements.

This institution performs well across most aspects, with **Internationality** standing out as its strongest area. Facilities, Professors, and Value also receive high marks. Areas for potential improvement include **Location**, which scored the lowest, and Accomodation. Student life and the overall value proposition are rated solidly in the mid-to-high range.

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its academic offerings, with Professors receiving a high rating of 4.43 and Location also scoring well at 4.14. Areas for potential improvement include Facilities, rated at 3.5, and Student Life, which received a 3.29. Accomodation, Internationality, and Value all achieved a respectable 3.86.

Performance across key university metrics shows a generally positive reception. Professors and student life emerge as the strongest areas, both receiving high marks. Accommodation, however, presents the weakest area according to these ratings. Internationality and value also score well, indicating broad strengths, while facilities and location fall in the middle of the spectrum.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Most reviews (~74%) are positive, praising academic reputation, expert faculty, and excellent resources. A small percentage (~3.4%) express dissatisfaction with lecturing quality, course structure, or career services.

~98% of 47 reviews are positive, highlighting supportive lecturers, practical and career-focused courses, and a well-structured learning environment. One negative review mentioned unapproachable lecturers.

Most reviews (approx. 74%) highlight positive experiences, citing strong academic support and a vibrant campus life. A smaller percentage (approx. 12.5%) raises concerns, particularly regarding the law department and ethical considerations.

Most reviews (approximately 71%) highlight a positive learning atmosphere, inspiring professors, and valuable international experiences. A small amount of feedback (around 14%) suggests mediocrity and a focus on profit. The average rating is 3.86/5.

With an average rating of 4.29/5 from 7 reviews, ~86% of feedback is positive. Students highlight collaborative learning, knowledgeable and attentive lecturers, and preparation for life after university. No negative feedback was reported.

Strong support services and dedicated lecturers are frequently praised, creating a positive learning environment for ~89% of students. A small amount of feedback mentions issues with enrollment and payment processes.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
34%
32%
40%
43%
43%
67%
0%
4★
44%
55%
40%
29%
43%
22%
0%
3★
19%
11%
7%
14%
14%
6%
0%
2★
2%
0%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
1%
2%
11%
14%
0%
6%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Great Experience

LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.

Undergraduate Law

This university is welcoming and continually helpful by staff and pupils. I would recommend this university to new students. The law degree I am currently studying is exactly what I expected and is also very enjoyable.

Supports violators of Human rights in third world

Unethical law department that invites judges who conduct oppression and violation of human human rights. Employs lecturer Niaz who attacks innocent visitors to the University. If this is the representation of the law department then God help us all.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close