London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs The Open University - OU vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie vs University of Bedfordshire - UOB vs Cranfield University School of Management
Side-by-side comparison from 436 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Expert and experienced faculty
- +Supportive and collaborative community atmosphere
- +Diverse and flexible learning and assessment methods
- +Flexible study options for busy lifestyles.
- +High-quality teaching and supportive tutors.
- +Wide course selection and progression opportunities.
- +Connecting theory to practice through real-world cases.
- +Diverse international environment and global opportunities.
- +Relevant industry-focused courses and knowledgeable faculty.
- +Welcoming and inclusive atmosphere with friendly people and supportive teachers
- +High-quality teaching from expert, accommodating, and understanding lecturers
- +Good resources and technological edge facilitating learning
- +High-quality, practical programmes with strong career focus
- +Excellent tutors and world-class resources
- +Prestigious reputation and high rankings
- +Flexible distance learning accommodating work and family life.
- +Supportive tutors and well-structured, easy-to-grasp modules.
- +Ability to control study pace and module load.
Nothing to show
- -Poor teaching quality and lack of structure in academic programs.
- -Inadequate support services and limited social opportunities.
- -High fees with perceived low value and administrative issues.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep are common complaints.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and unresponsiveness are problematic.
- -Perceived as a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
- -Outdated facilities and resources detract from the learning experience.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are major concerns.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance detract from the learning environment.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
Nothing to show
Perceived strengths of this institution lie significantly in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both receiving top marks. Conversely, **Student Life** emerges as the area with the lowest reported satisfaction. Ratings for Facilities, Professors, Accomodation, and Value fall within a moderate to good range, indicating generally positive feedback across these aspects.
Overall, this institution garners strong approval, particularly excelling in **Internationality** (4.375), **Value** (4.458), and **Location** (4.333). **Professors** also receive a commendable score of 4.25. The primary area needing improvement is **Accomodation**, with a significantly lower rating of 3.14, while **Student Life** (3.809) and **Facilities** (3.835) fall in the mid-range.
This institution performs well across most aspects, with **Internationality** standing out as its strongest area. Facilities, Professors, and Value also receive high marks. Areas for potential improvement include **Location**, which scored the lowest, and Accomodation. Student life and the overall value proposition are rated solidly in the mid-to-high range.
Remarkable strengths are evident in this university's **Location**, boasting the highest rating. **Value** and **Professors** also received exceptionally high marks. Areas with the lowest scores, though still generally positive, are **Accomodation** and **Facilities**. The university shows a solid performance in **Student Life** and **Internationality**, contributing to a well-rounded profile.
A comprehensive assessment reveals considerable strengths and areas for development. Professors receive the highest marks at 4.57, with Facilities and Student Life also scoring well at 4.14. Value is rated a solid 4. Conversely, Location is the weakest area, rated at 3.14, with Internationality also scoring moderately lower at 3.43. Accommodations are rated favorably at 3.86.
Across key metrics, this university shows a varied performance. Its strongest areas are Value, with a rating of 4.57, and Professors, at 4.43. Location and Internationality also score highly. Conversely, Student Life receives the lowest marks at 2.6, with Facilities and Accomodation also in the lower half of ratings.
Nothing to show
Most reviews (~74%) are positive, praising academic reputation, expert faculty, and excellent resources. A small percentage (~3.4%) express dissatisfaction with lecturing quality, course structure, or career services.
With an average rating of 4.41/5 from 66 reviews, ~93% are positive. Students praise the flexibility, choice of courses, and helpful resources, particularly for those working. No negative reviews were provided.
Most reviews (approximately 71%) highlight a positive learning atmosphere, inspiring professors, and valuable international experiences. A small amount of feedback (around 14%) suggests mediocrity and a focus on profit. The average rating is 3.86/5.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~89%) with an average rating of 4.37/5. Students frequently praise inclusive and welcoming atmospheres, expert and supportive faculty, and helpful resources like the library. No negative reviews were recorded.
With a ~93% positive rating (4.29/5), students highlight prestigious programs, practical learning, and career support. Minimal negative feedback exists, not currently representing a recurring theme.
Reviews are highly positive (100%), with students praising the flexibility of distance learning for balancing work and family life. The supportive tutors and well-structured modules are recurring themes.
Nothing to show
LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.
this university suits you who wants or need to get a job before finishing your degree. what i like about this uni is they have this option to do learn without coming to campus. what i hate is their system is developing slowly through the era. I wish i was enrolled 2 years prior, but their online system at that time wasn't today's good. I would recommend this learning center to those who wants to pursue their degree a little late like me.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Having worked in the finance sector for over half a decade, my programme (MSc Finance and Management) repositioned my existing knowledge of the sector practically and theoretically through a predominantly quantitative approach to financial management studies. The Cranfield School of management has incredibly educated, experienced, and professional tutors to fit each and every module offered. The finance Information Technology (IT) resources in the faculty's possession are world-class and up-to-date, providing real-time data analysis and research solutions. I also had the opportunity to meet intelligently amazing people (co-students) from all works of life. The university environment is serene, comfortable, and accommodating. The alumni network is far-reaching and supportive. In summary, I had an extraordinarily memorable experience studying for my MSc in Finance and Management at Cranfield University. I highly recommend the University to prospective students
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
