IÉSEG School of Management vs emlyon business school vs ONCAMPUS Global vs Excelia Business School vs ICD Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 421 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Engaging and practical learning experiences
- +Strong international and diverse community
- +Opportunities for personal and professional growth
- +Practical and international programs with diverse students
- +Valuable professional experience through internships and work-study
- +Supportive environment for personal and professional development
- +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
- +Excellent facilities and convenient location
- +Strong academic and personal development support
- +Diverse and multicultural environment, international opportunities
- +High-quality teaching, engaging professors, and practical curriculum
- +Strong alumni network and enriching student experience
- +Engaging learning environment and quality education
- +Supportive and accessible staff and professors
- +Valuable internship and growth opportunities
- +Interactive and personalized learning with engaged professors
- +Diverse and international community fostering personal growth
- +Small class sizes for close student-professor relationships
- +Transformative personal and professional growth
- +Practical, market-relevant skills for career advancement
- +High-quality, competent faculty and engaging courses
- -Frequent last-minute changes disrupt scheduling and planning.
- -Perceived lack of effort to improve the classroom experience.
- -Concerns about course offerings and professor quality.
- -Lack of practical value and shallow content in courses.
- -Unfair and frustrating grading, especially for group projects.
- -Disappointing professor engagement and program support.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep frustrate students.
- -Lack of resources and inadequate support services are common complaints.
- -Superficial course content and lack of practical value.
- -Perceived unprofessionalism and inadequate career support despite high tuition.
- -Mismatched course offerings with student expectations.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are common complaints.
- -Lack of resources and support hinders academic success.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
- -Lack of engagement and relevance in coursework is a concern.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of resources and support for students is a major concern.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in several key areas, with Internationality receiving the highest score. Location and Value also received very favorable ratings. Conversely, Accomodation emerged as the area with the lowest score, indicating room for improvement in this aspect of the student experience. Overall, the university presents a compelling offering across most dimensions.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strength in its internationality and location, both scoring above 4.5. Student life and value also received positive marks, exceeding 4.2 and 4.4 respectively. However, accommodation presents as the weakest area, with the lowest rating of approximately 3.94. Facilities and professors also received solid, though slightly lower, scores in comparison.
Overall, the university garners strong ratings across various aspects. Professors are exceptionally well-regarded, achieving the highest score. Location and Internationality also stand out with excellent marks. Student Life, Facilities, and Value also reflect positive sentiment. Accommodation, while still strong, receives the lowest rating among the surveyed categories.
This university demonstrates particularly strong performance in its Internationality (4.29), Location (4.28), and Student Life (4.25). Conversely, Accomodation appears to be its weakest area, receiving a rating of 3.59. Ratings for Facilities (3.97), Professors (3.93), and Value (3.93) fall within a moderate range.
This institution garners excellent marks across a broad spectrum of evaluations. Professors receive perfect scores, reflecting exceptional teaching quality. Facilities, location, accommodation, and internationality are all highly rated at 4.5. Student life, while still strong at 4, is the comparatively lowest-rated area. Overall, the university presents a very positive and well-rounded picture for prospective students.
This university garners strong praise, particularly for its **Professors** (4.89) and **Location** (4.81). **Student Life** (4.57), **Internationality** (4.55), and **Value** (4.55) also receive favorable scores. **Facilities** (4.43) and **Accommodation** (4.29) are rated well, though they represent the lowest scores in this assessment.
Overall, this university receives commendations across most aspects, with particularly high marks for its professors (4.83) and internationality (4.67). Facilities and student life also score well. The weakest area identified is accommodation, with a rating of 3.33. Value for money is rated at a solid 4.17.
Overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~91% of reviews being 4-5 stars and an average rating of 4.38/5. A small ~0.8% expressed concerns about learning outcomes and last-minute changes.
The vast majority of university students have a positive experience, highlighting academic rigor, practical learning, and international environments. A small fraction of reviews mention disappointment with course content and grading.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~100% of 20 feedback entries rating 4–5 stars. Students praise friendly, supportive teachers, excellent facilities like the library, and effective student support services that build confidence.
~95% of reviews are positive, highlighting multicultural environments, strong alumni networks, and quality teaching. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions superficial course coverage and lack of practical value.
With an average rating of 5/5 and 100% positive feedback, students highlight abundant growth opportunities, quality education, and exceptional teaching methods. They also appreciate the welcoming atmosphere, accessibility of staff, and valuable internship experiences.
All 29 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.66/5. Students praise the interactive learning, international community, and supportive professors. They highlight academic and personal growth in a motivating environment.
All 6 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students highlight challenging and transformative experiences, career advancements, and high-quality courses and professors.
IÉSEG offers interactive teaching and international opportunities. I had the chance to go on an exchange to another country, which opened up new perspectives for me. The courses in Lille are stimulating, and the professors are very involved in our success.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I am currently a 3rd year student at Forward College and I have thoroughly enjoyed the experience and would recommend it to other students. The interactive approach of Forward where questions, debate, and discussion were encouraged enhanced my learning so much and I feel like I genuinely enjoyed every class. Having the experience of living in 3 different cultures, surrounded by people from all over the world made this experience even more special and helped me develop and grow in so many ways. Another aspect I have loved are the professors. Speaking with friends at other university I am so grateful to have teachers that actually know us, are excited to teach and interact with us, and will always take the time to help you.
Nothing to show
