London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs University of Hull vs Brunel University London vs Bishop Burton College vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie
Side-by-side comparison from 530 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Expert and experienced faculty
- +Supportive and collaborative community atmosphere
- +Diverse and flexible learning and assessment methods
- +Strong academic support and tailored programs
- +Vibrant campus life and facilities
- +Balance of theory and practical application
- +Practical, career-focused learning with industry experience
- +Supportive and inspiring lecturers with expertise
- +Accessible campus facilities and resources
- +Comprehensive and engaging curriculum.
- +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty.
- +Vibrant campus community and opportunities.
- +Connecting theory to practice through real-world cases.
- +Diverse international environment and global opportunities.
- +Relevant industry-focused courses and knowledgeable faculty.
- +Supportive and helpful teaching staff
- +Affordable tuition and good value
- +Abundant career and internship opportunities
- +Diverse international environment and supportive faculty
- +World-class resources and opportunities for personal and professional growth
- +Strong emphasis on innovation, industry connections, and inclusivity
- -Poor teaching quality and lack of structure in academic programs.
- -Inadequate support services and limited social opportunities.
- -High fees with perceived low value and administrative issues.
- -Ethical concerns regarding the law department's affiliations and invited speakers.
- -Perceived corruption and human rights violations associated with university partnerships.
- -Negative impact on the university's reputation and the student experience.
- -Course content is often repetitive and not applicable to real life.
- -Teaching methods are confusing and make concepts difficult to grasp.
- -Lack of clarity and consistency in academic and administrative processes.
- -Inadequate and outdated facilities and resources.
- -Insufficient support and engagement from faculty and university staff.
- -Perceived as a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and a disconnect with instructors are prevalent complaints.
- -Administrative and management issues create frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a persistent concern.
- -Ineffective teaching and curriculum lead to dissatisfaction.
Perceived strengths of this institution lie significantly in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both receiving top marks. Conversely, **Student Life** emerges as the area with the lowest reported satisfaction. Ratings for Facilities, Professors, Accomodation, and Value fall within a moderate to good range, indicating generally positive feedback across these aspects.
The surveyed university demonstrates its strongest performance in **Facilities**, earning a high rating. Conversely, **Accomodation** received the lowest score among the assessed categories. Other areas like Professors, Location, Student Life, Internationality, and Value all fall within a generally positive mid-range, suggesting a well-rounded educational experience with specific room for improvement in living arrangements.
This university garners strong performance in several key areas, notably **Internationality** at 4.36 and **Value** at 4.16. Ratings for **Professors** (4.06) and **Facilities** (4.01) are also commendable. The university's **Location** (3.74) and **Student Life** (3.86) are rated moderately well. The weakest area appears to be **Accomodation**, receiving the lowest rating at 3.63.
This institution presents a mixed performance in its university ratings. Its strongest aspect is the location, scoring a solid 4. Conversely, student life received a notably low score of 0, indicating a significant area for improvement. Ratings for facilities, professors, accommodation, internationality, and value are all consistent at a moderate 3.
This institution performs well across most aspects, with **Internationality** standing out as its strongest area. Facilities, Professors, and Value also receive high marks. Areas for potential improvement include **Location**, which scored the lowest, and Accomodation. Student life and the overall value proposition are rated solidly in the mid-to-high range.
Across all surveyed areas, this institution demonstrates exceptional strength. It achieves a perfect score of 5 out of 5 in every category, including Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value. Consequently, there are no discernible weak areas; the university excels uniformly, suggesting a consistently high-quality experience for its students.
This university demonstrates exceptional strengths in Internationality, scoring a near-perfect 4.78, and also excels in Location with a 4.67 rating. Student Life also receives a high mark at 4.5. Areas for potential improvement include Professors, with a rating of 4.22, and Facilities, which garnered a 4.44. Overall, the institution presents a positive picture with notable advantages in global reach and campus setting.
Most reviews (~74%) are positive, praising academic reputation, expert faculty, and excellent resources. A small percentage (~3.4%) express dissatisfaction with lecturing quality, course structure, or career services.
Most reviews (approx. 74%) highlight positive experiences, citing strong academic support and a vibrant campus life. A smaller percentage (approx. 12.5%) raises concerns, particularly regarding the law department and ethical considerations.
With a 4.17 average rating from 118 reviews, ~98.3% of feedback is positive, highlighting practical, career-focused learning, helpful lecturers, and good campus resources. A small amount of negative feedback exists.
This university received a single review, rating it 1 out of 5 stars. The feedback was entirely negative, expressing concerns about speaker selection for an event.
Most reviews (approximately 71%) highlight a positive learning atmosphere, inspiring professors, and valuable international experiences. A small amount of feedback (around 14%) suggests mediocrity and a focus on profit. The average rating is 3.86/5.
This university has overwhelmingly positive feedback, with 100% of reviews being 4-5 stars. Students praise the helpful teachers, affordability, and numerous opportunities for jobs and internships.
University feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100% of reviews), with a 4.22/5 average. Students praise world-class resources, supportive faculty, global exposure, and personal development opportunities.
LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.
Unethical law department that invites judges who conduct oppression and violation of human human rights. Employs lecturer Niaz who attacks innocent visitors to the University. If this is the representation of the law department then God help us all.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
