London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs City St George’s, University of London - City vs Greenwich Business School vs The University of Law Business School vs eTrain

Side-by-side comparison from 434 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE: wins 0/5 categories
City St George’s, University of London - City: wins 0/5 categories
Greenwich Business School: wins 1/5 categories
The University of Law Business School: wins 0/5 categories
eTrain: wins 0/5 categories
Future London Academy: wins 0/5 categories
Chartered Institute of Management Accountants (CIMA): wins 4/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Economics
Best programme: Law
London, The United Kingdom
4.30
Read more reviews
4 reviews
×
Best programme: Event Management
Birmingham, The United Kingdom
5.00
Read more reviews
5 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting and Business Finance
London, The United Kingdom
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
London, The United Kingdom
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting and Business Finance
Category ratings
Facilities
4.04
4.37
4.25
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Location
4.78
4.10
4.50
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Professors
4.26
4.22
4.25
4.60
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Internationality
4.80
4.35
4.50
4.80
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Student life
3.63
4.17
4.25
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.04
4.13
4.50
4.80
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Accommodation
3.78
3.94
4.00
2.50
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Expert and experienced faculty
  • +Supportive and collaborative community atmosphere
  • +Diverse and flexible learning and assessment methods
  • +Central location and accessibility
  • +Knowledgeable and supportive staff/tutors
  • +High-quality, engaging education and opportunities
  • +Engaging and supportive faculty.
  • +Comprehensive and industry-relevant course content.
  • +Excellent facilities and student life.
  • +Supportive staff and wellbeing resources
  • +Smooth application process and fast feedback
  • +Career coaching and employable skills development

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Accessible resources and user-friendly website
  • +Positive learning environment and supportive teachers
  • +Strong professional development and career opportunities
Cons
  • -Poor teaching quality and lack of structure in academic programs.
  • -Inadequate support services and limited social opportunities.
  • -High fees with perceived low value and administrative issues.
  • -Poor teaching quality and ineffective lectures.
  • -Lack of academic rigor and research standards.
  • -Financial focus over student learning and career preparation.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Inflexible or irrelevant course content is a common complaint.
  • -Administrative and management issues caused significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance were major drawbacks.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from faculty was a recurring problem.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment are a common complaint.
  • -Lack of clear communication and transparency exacerbates problems.
Rating summary
What students say

Perceived strengths of this institution lie significantly in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both receiving top marks. Conversely, **Student Life** emerges as the area with the lowest reported satisfaction. Ratings for Facilities, Professors, Accomodation, and Value fall within a moderate to good range, indicating generally positive feedback across these aspects.

Offering a well-rounded experience, this institution excels in its **Facilities** and **Internationality**, both receiving ratings above 4.3. **Professors** and **Student Life** also score highly, indicating positive academic and social environments. The **Value** proposition is solid at over 4.1. However, **Accomodation** presents the area with the lowest score, falling below 4.0, suggesting it could benefit from improvement.

This institution demonstrates strong performance, particularly in its Location and Internationality, both scoring an excellent 4.5. Student Life, Facilities, and Professors also receive commendably high marks at 4.25. Accomodation stands out as a slightly less strong area with a rating of 4, while Value also scores highly at 4.5.

This institution shines in several key areas, boasting perfect scores for its facilities and location, alongside excellent marks for internationality and value. Student life receives a solid rating. However, accommodation stands out as a weaker point, scoring significantly lower than other aspects. Professors are also highly regarded.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With outstanding scores in nearly every aspect, this institution excels in its facilities, professors, location, accommodation, internationality, and overall value, all receiving perfect marks. However, a significant area for improvement is evident in student life, which received the lowest possible rating, indicating a substantial deficit in this crucial category.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Most reviews (~74%) are positive, praising academic reputation, expert faculty, and excellent resources. A small percentage (~3.4%) express dissatisfaction with lecturing quality, course structure, or career services.

With a 4.32 average rating from 101 reviews, approximately 93% are positive, praising the university's excellent location, helpful staff, and engaging course content. A small 2% of feedback offered criticism.

University reviews are predominantly positive (~75%), with students highlighting helpful teachers and insightful modules. The student experience is described as memorable and well-supported. No negative feedback was provided.

All five reviews are positive, with students praising supportive staff and departments, smooth application processes, and helpful career coaching. Resources like a large library and advance module content are also highlighted.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 5/5, 100% of reviews are positive. Students praise the university experience and CIMA's support, describing it as a dream come true.

Rating distribution
5★
34%
43%
50%
100%
0%
0%
100%
4★
44%
50%
25%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
19%
6%
25%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
2%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
1%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Great Experience

LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.

Unlocking My Potential at City University London

My time at City University London was truly transformative. The university's vibrant community and diverse extracurricular activities allowed me to forge lifelong friendships and professional connections that extend beyond the classroom. I was impressed by the university's commitment to academic rigor, character development, and personal growth, which created an ideal environment for me to reach my full potential. The research-driven and industry-relevant curriculum provided me with a solid foundation in international business, while the dedicated faculty and staff offered invaluable guidance and support. I feel grateful for the well-rounded education and holistic experience that City University London offered, preparing me for success in my career and beyond.

Nothing to show

Amazing teaching

It’s a good place to study with lots of activities to do do and with a lot of useful resources as they have a 4 floor library which is great to find studies or even a quite place to study. The modules are set out perfectly with all the content already put up in advance for the students to have a look at so that they can study in advance and have a look through before lessons.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

CIMA-My Dream

It was a dream come true, I wanted to become a CIMA member which I achieved in 2015, the thing I like their support very user friendly website, the thing I dislike is the Merger with AICPA, as it seems like for most members it is not a merger but a take over. All in all I am happy to be a member in this Esteem Management Accountancy body.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close