London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs ONCAMPUS Global vs University of West London vs Brunel Business School vs Greenwich Business School

Side-by-side comparison from 420 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: London Academy of Trading - LAT (5.00)
London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE: wins 0/7 categories
ONCAMPUS Global: wins 0/7 categories
University of West London: wins 0/7 categories
Brunel Business School: wins 0/7 categories
Greenwich Business School: wins 0/7 categories
London Academy of Trading - LAT: wins 7/7 categories
Institute of Risk Management: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Economics
London, The United Kingdom
4.80
Read more reviews
21 reviews
×
Best programme: Undergraduate Foundation Programme
London, The United Kingdom
4.40
Read more reviews
52 reviews
×
Best programme: Artificial Intelligence
London, The United Kingdom
4.60
Read more reviews
14 reviews
×
Best programme: Business and Management
London, The United Kingdom
4.30
Read more reviews
4 reviews
×
Best programme: Event Management
London, The United Kingdom
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Advanced Trading Course
London, The United Kingdom
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.05
4.44
4.42
3.85
4.25
5.00
Win
Not rated
Location
4.78
4.75
4.44
3.25
4.50
5.00
Win
Not rated
Professors
4.26
4.76
4.42
4.29
4.25
5.00
Win
Not rated
Internationality
4.80
4.62
4.46
4.14
4.50
5.00
Win
Not rated
Student life
3.65
4.58
4.20
4.08
4.25
5.00
Win
Not rated
Value
4.05
4.52
4.33
4.00
4.50
5.00
Win
Not rated
Accommodation
3.80
4.35
3.89
3.79
4.00
4.50
Win
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Knowledgeable and approachable faculty
  • +High-quality academic programs and clear feedback
  • +Excellent facilities and resources
  • +Supportive and approachable teachers
  • +Excellent student support services
  • +Convenient campus location and facilities
  • +Strong industry connections and career opportunities
  • +Engaging and relevant curriculum
  • +Positive social environment and helpful staff
  • +Applied learning and relevant coursework
  • +Strong employability and career support
  • +Flexible schedules and learning resources
  • +Engaging and supportive faculty.
  • +Comprehensive and industry-relevant course content.
  • +Excellent facilities and student life.
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable tutors
  • +Engaging daily webinars with market analysis
  • +Improved trading profitability and understanding

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Poor teaching quality and unstructured courses.
  • -High fees combined with lack of support and career services.
  • -Limited social life and judgmental environment.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are prevalent.
  • -Inefficient administrative processes and lack of clear communication are frustrating.
  • -Limited resources and support for academic needs are a concern.
  • -Administrative and communication issues cause confusion and disruption.
  • -Unclear communication and bureaucratic processes.
  • -Lack of modern resources and support.
  • -Outdated facilities and infrastructure.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Inflexible or irrelevant course content is a common complaint.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of engagement and uninspired teaching methods are disliked.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Examining the university's performance reveals a diverse set of scores. The strongest areas are **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving very high marks. **Student Life** stands out as the weakest performing category. Other areas like **Professors**, **Accomodation**, and **Facilities** received solid, above-average ratings, with **Value** also scoring positively.

This institution garners strong approval across multiple aspects, with particularly high marks for its **Professors (4.76)** and **Location (4.75)**. Student life and internationality also score well, above 4.5. **Accommodations (4.35)** received the lowest rating, though still generally positive, while facilities and value demonstrate solid, above-average performance.

This institution receives particularly high marks for its **Internationality** (4.46) and **Location** (4.45). **Professors** (4.43) and **Facilities** (4.42) also score very well. **Student Life** (4.19) and **Value** (4.33) are rated positively. The **Accomodation** (3.89) is the lowest-scoring area, though still above average.

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its faculty, with professors receiving a high rating of 4.29. Student life also scores well at 4.08, alongside a strong internationality rating of 4.14. Value for money is rated at a solid 4.0. Conversely, location appears to be the least favored aspect, scoring 3.25. Facilities are moderately rated at 3.85, and accommodation also receives a respectable 3.79.

This institution demonstrates strong performance, particularly in its Location and Internationality, both scoring an excellent 4.5. Student Life, Facilities, and Professors also receive commendably high marks at 4.25. Accomodation stands out as a slightly less strong area with a rating of 4, while Value also scores highly at 4.5.

Across numerous metrics, this institution demonstrates exceptional strengths. Facilities, professors, location, student life, and internationality all garnered perfect scores, indicating outstanding offerings in these domains. The sole area falling slightly short, though still very strong, is accommodation at 4.5 stars, suggesting a minor area for potential enhancement compared to its otherwise flawless performance.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Approximately 96.6% of reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable professors, supportive learning environments, and strong academic reputations. A small percentage (around 3.4%) of negative feedback cites issues with lecturing, grading, and course structure.

All 21 reviews are positive, averaging 4.76/5 stars. Students frequently praised helpful teachers, strong academic support, and good facilities. Some also highlighted a positive transition experience and newfound confidence.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~86% praising great experiences, helpful staff, and relevant courses. A small amount of negative feedback, ~2%, concerns administrative communication and organization.

With an average rating of 4.64/5 from 14 reviews, ~93% are positive. Students praise applied learning, employability skills, and support for international students. There are no negative reviews.

University reviews are predominantly positive (~75%), with students highlighting helpful teachers and insightful modules. The student experience is described as memorable and well-supported. No negative feedback was provided.

Both reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Key highlights include excellent tutors, engaging daily webinars, and improved trading profitability. Students appreciated the supportive learning environment that clarified market understanding.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
34%
76%
56%
71%
50%
100%
0%
4★
44%
24%
31%
21%
25%
0%
0%
3★
18%
0%
12%
7%
25%
0%
0%
2★
2%
0%
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Great Experience

LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close