New York College European and American Education - NYC vs Metropolitan University of Tirana - UMT vs Faculty of Economics, University of Tirana - FEUT vs University of New York Tirana - UNYT vs University College of Beder
Side-by-side comparison from 35 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +High-quality, multicultural education
- +Excellent, experienced professors
- +Strong business programs
- +Expert faculty with international experience
- +Modern facilities and infrastructure
- +Valuable learning experiences and professional development
- +Excellent academic programs and preparation for future careers.
- +Qualified and approachable faculty.
- +Good campus facilities and international opportunities.
- +Quality programs and knowledgeable, supportive professors
- +Engaging faculty and staff
- +Good learning environment and opportunities
- +Strong academic support and accessible professors
- +Excellent library resources
- +Great location and facilities
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern amenities frustrate students.
- -Inefficient administrative processes and poor communication cause significant problems.
- -Overcrowded classrooms and a lack of individual attention detract from the learning experience.
- -Lack of genuine teacher engagement and student support.
- -Perceived focus on financial gain over educational quality.
- -Waste of money due to poor value.
- -Outdated facilities and poor infrastructure.
- -Lack of practical application and career support.
- -Administrative and communication issues.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology impede learning.
- -High costs are perceived as poor value for the educational experience.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a frequent complaint.
- -Administrative issues and poor communication from staff are consistently disliked.
- -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant and lacking practical application.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This institution presents a uniform, middling performance across all evaluated aspects. With zero ratings in categories spanning facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, there are no standout strengths or discernible weaknesses. The university's profile is entirely consistent, indicating an average experience in every surveyed area.
This institution garners consistently solid ratings across several key aspects, with facilities, professors, location, student life, and value all receiving a strong 3.67. The areas showing slightly lower, though still respectable, scores are accommodation and internationality, both averaging 3.33. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded experience with particular strengths in its core academic and extracurricular offerings.
When examining the university's performance across various categories, location stands out as the strongest area, receiving a high rating. Conversely, accommodation emerges as the weakest point, with the lowest score among the surveyed aspects. Other notable areas include professors and value, which received moderate ratings, while facilities, student life, and internationality scored lower.
This university is highly regarded, particularly excelling in its professors, internationality, and value, all receiving scores of 4.67. Student life, accommodation, and location also score well, with 4.33 to 4.0 ratings. The facilities represent the lowest-rated aspect at 3.67.
This university garners impressive scores, with professors, location, student life, and value standing out as exceptionally strong areas, all receiving a perfect 4.67. Facilities and accommodation also score well at 4.33, alongside internationality. While no category falls below a strong rating, facilities and accommodation represent the relatively weakest aspects compared to the university's other highly praised attributes.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With a single review, the feedback is overwhelmingly positive. The reviewer highlights the high quality of multicultural education and academic collaborations. Professors are described as excellent with practical experience.
With an average rating of 3.67, reviews are mostly positive (~67%), highlighting quality private education, expert professors, and good infrastructure. A minority (~33%) express concerns about teaching quality and teacher engagement.
Roughly 32% of reviews are negative. Positive feedback highlights prepared professors and good programs, while negative comments cite poor facilities, outdated materials, and lack of practical application.
All three reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4/5. Students highlight good programs, knowledgeable faculty, and a supportive learning environment. No negative feedback was received.
With 100% positive feedback and an average rating of 4.67/5, students praise strong teaching, helpful professors, and excellent library resources. They also highlight good programs and convenient locations.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
It has a lot of place for improvement in every aspect. It needs to work on it's facilities and schedules. It desperately needs to fix the heat system and all the classrooms. It lacks a lot when it comes to putting in practise what you been studying and should help it's students when it comes to finding an internship.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show