New York College European and American Education - NYC vs Faculty of Economics, University of Tirana - FEUT vs University of New York Tirana - UNYT vs University College of Beder vs University Marin Barleti - UMB

Side-by-side comparison from 36 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Mediterranean University of Albania - MUA (5.00)
New York College European and American Education - NYC: wins 0/4 categories
Faculty of Economics, University of Tirana - FEUT: wins 0/4 categories
University of New York Tirana - UNYT: wins 1/4 categories
University College of Beder: wins 2/4 categories
University Marin Barleti - UMB: wins 0/4 categories
Mediterranean University of Albania - MUA: wins 1/4 categories
Western Balkans University - WBU: wins 0/4 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: Informatics
Best programme: Information and Communication Technology
Best programme: Accounting and Finance
Best programme: Animation
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
2.28
3.67
4.33
5.00
5.00
Not rated
Location
Not rated
3.76
4.33
4.67
Win
4.00
4.50
Not rated
Professors
Not rated
3.36
4.67
4.67
5.00
5.00
Not rated
Internationality
Not rated
2.32
4.67
Win
4.33
4.50
4.50
Not rated
Student life
Not rated
2.36
4.00
4.67
Win
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Value
Not rated
3.08
4.67
4.67
4.50
5.00
Win
Not rated
Accommodation
Not rated
2.20
4.00
4.33
4.50
4.50
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High-quality, multicultural education
  • +Excellent, experienced professors
  • +Strong business programs
  • +Excellent academic programs and preparation for future careers.
  • +Qualified and approachable faculty.
  • +Good campus facilities and international opportunities.
  • +Quality programs and knowledgeable, supportive professors
  • +Engaging faculty and staff
  • +Good learning environment and opportunities
  • +Strong academic support and accessible professors
  • +Excellent library resources
  • +Great location and facilities
  • +Qualified and experienced pedagogical staff
  • +Positive and welcoming university environment
  • +Employment and training opportunities
  • +Hands-on training for job market competitiveness.
  • +Inspiring and flexible teaching.

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern amenities frustrate students.
  • -Inefficient administrative processes and poor communication cause significant problems.
  • -Overcrowded classrooms and a lack of individual attention detract from the learning experience.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor infrastructure.
  • -Lack of practical application and career support.
  • -Administrative and communication issues.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology impede learning.
  • -High costs are perceived as poor value for the educational experience.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a frequent complaint.
  • -Administrative issues and poor communication from staff are consistently disliked.
  • -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant and lacking practical application.
  • -Administrative & management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Course content is often irrelevant and poorly delivered.
  • -Administrative and management issues create constant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder effective learning.
  • -Unresponsive communication from staff is a significant problem.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution presents a uniform, middling performance across all evaluated aspects. With zero ratings in categories spanning facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, there are no standout strengths or discernible weaknesses. The university's profile is entirely consistent, indicating an average experience in every surveyed area.

When examining the university's performance across various categories, location stands out as the strongest area, receiving a high rating. Conversely, accommodation emerges as the weakest point, with the lowest score among the surveyed aspects. Other notable areas include professors and value, which received moderate ratings, while facilities, student life, and internationality scored lower.

This university is highly regarded, particularly excelling in its professors, internationality, and value, all receiving scores of 4.67. Student life, accommodation, and location also score well, with 4.33 to 4.0 ratings. The facilities represent the lowest-rated aspect at 3.67.

This university garners impressive scores, with professors, location, student life, and value standing out as exceptionally strong areas, all receiving a perfect 4.67. Facilities and accommodation also score well at 4.33, alongside internationality. While no category falls below a strong rating, facilities and accommodation represent the relatively weakest aspects compared to the university's other highly praised attributes.

This institution receives exceptionally high marks for its **facilities and professors**, both scoring a perfect five. The university also excels in **student life, internationality, and overall value**, each earning a strong 4.5. Its weakest area, while still positive, is its **location**, rated at 4. Accommodation also scores well at 4.5.

This institution garners exceptionally high marks, notably achieving perfect scores for its facilities and professors. Student life, while positive, is the lowest-rated area at 4 out of 5. The university also scores well in location, accommodation, internationality, and value, all receiving 4.5 ratings. Overall, it presents a very strong offering to its students.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a single review, the feedback is overwhelmingly positive. The reviewer highlights the high quality of multicultural education and academic collaborations. Professors are described as excellent with practical experience.

Roughly 32% of reviews are negative. Positive feedback highlights prepared professors and good programs, while negative comments cite poor facilities, outdated materials, and lack of practical application.

All three reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4/5. Students highlight good programs, knowledgeable faculty, and a supportive learning environment. No negative feedback was received.

With 100% positive feedback and an average rating of 4.67/5, students praise strong teaching, helpful professors, and excellent library resources. They also highlight good programs and convenient locations.

The university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students praise the specialized and experienced pedagogical staff, the comfortable environment, and opportunities for employment and training. Negative feedback is minimal.

With an average rating of 5/5, these two reviews are entirely positive. Students highlight hands-on training and inspiring, hardworking teachers, making them competitive in the job market.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
0%
4%
0%
67%
50%
100%
0%
4★
100%
32%
100%
33%
50%
0%
0%
3★
0%
32%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
16%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
16%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Concerning FEUT

It has a lot of place for improvement in every aspect. It needs to work on it's facilities and schedules. It desperately needs to fix the heat system and all the classrooms. It lacks a lot when it comes to putting in practise what you been studying and should help it's students when it comes to finding an internship.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close