Universidad Europea - UE vs University of Lisbon - ULisboa vs Universidade Católica Portuguesa – Porto vs Catholic Lisbon School of Business and Economics vs Nova School of Social Sciences and Humanities - FCSH
Side-by-side comparison from 221 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Modern teaching and attractive campus
- +Strong business opportunities and practical learning
- +Supportive faculty and international exchange programs
- +Excellent professors and inspiring academic environment
- +High-quality facilities and welcoming campus life
- +Strong academic reputation and diverse study programs
- +Practical, career-focused programs and strong job preparation
- +Supportive, approachable faculty and welcoming community
- +Excellent, well-equipped research facilities and modern infrastructure
- +High-quality teaching and qualified, experienced faculty
- +Strong academic reputation and rigorous programs
- +Supportive learning environment and flexibility
- +Strong humanities and social sciences programs
- +Knowledgeable and approachable faculty
- +Supportive and diverse academic environment
- +Interdisciplinary and practical learning opportunities
- +International atmosphere and community
- +Modern facilities and career prospects
- +Inspiring and creative environment with supportive and industry-experienced faculty.
- +Practical, project-based learning with accessible resources and active student life.
- +Modern facilities and dynamic, international atmosphere fostering growth.
- -Unresponsive and unhelpful administrative staff.
- -Teachers are indifferent and unsupportive of student learning.
- -High costs for course materials.
- -Outdated facilities and technology are a major concern.
- -Insufficient parking and inefficient administrative processes cause frustration.
- -Limited course variety and unengaging teaching methods are frequently mentioned.
- -Repetitive and outdated course content with little professional value.
- -Lack of transparency and clarity in grading and feedback.
- -Poor job market recognition and career opportunities.
- -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are common complaints.
- -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or lacking depth.
- -Too theoretical and not work-market relevant.
- -Lack of accommodation.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
- -Inefficient administrative and management processes.
- -Lack of clear communication and transparency.
- -Apathy from professors and unclear curriculum.
- -Inadequate teaching and poor resource provision.
- -Rudeness and harsh grading for self-taught material.
Overall, the university receives strong marks, particularly in **Internationality (4.6)** and **Facilities (4.33)**. Student Life and Professors also score well, both above 4.2. The weakest areas identified are **Accomodation (3.87)** and **Value (3.78)**, though these still represent a moderately positive rating.
This institution performs exceptionally well in Location, boasting a rating of 4.24, closely followed by Value at 4.2 and Student Life at 4.11. Conversely, Accomodation emerges as the weakest area, receiving a rating of 3.39. Other aspects like Facilities, Professors, and Internationality fall within a respectable mid-range, indicating a generally positive but varied student experience.
Overall, this institution receives positive marks across key aspects of the student experience. Its strongest area is **Value**, boasting a score of 4.65. **Professors** also garnered excellent feedback at 4.54. The **Accomodation** rating, however, stands out as the weakest point, with a score of 3.79. Other areas like Facilities, Location, Student Life, and Internationality also received commendations in the mid-4 range.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its academic offerings and campus environment. Professors received a very high rating (4.3), closely followed by location (4.25) and internationality and value (both 4.15). Facilities also scored well at 4.05. The area with the lowest score is accommodation, at 3.45, indicating room for improvement in this aspect. Student life, while solid, falls slightly behind other metrics at 3.79.
Assessing the university's performance reveals a mixed but generally positive picture. Location stands out as the strongest area, receiving a remarkable 4.47. Student life and internationality also score highly, both above 4.1. Conversely, accommodation presents the weakest point, with a rating of just over 3.17. Facilities and professor quality are mid-range, while value for money is also well-regarded.
Overall, this institution garners favorable reviews, particularly excelling in the areas of **Professors** and **Location**, both rated at 4.33. Student life, facilities, and internationality are also well-regarded, averaging 3.67. However, **Accommodations** and **Value** received the lowest scores, both at 3.33, indicating these are areas for potential improvement.
Examining the provided ratings, this institution demonstrates particular strengths in **Location**, achieving the highest score. Conversely, **Student Life** received the lowest rating among the assessed categories. Other areas like Facilities, Professors, Accomodation, Internationality, and Value fall within a moderate range, suggesting areas for potential improvement alongside recognized positive attributes.
Nearly 74% of 54 reviews are positive, highlighting modern teaching methods, spacious campuses, and good career opportunities. A small amount of negative feedback (~3.7%) notes administrative issues and unengaged instructors.
University of Lisbon receives overwhelmingly positive feedback (~94%) from 84 reviews. Students praise excellent professors, strong academic reputation, and good facilities. A small amount of negative feedback (~0%) noted slow administrative processes.
Approximately 92% of reviews are positive, highlighting good career preparation, practice-oriented courses, supportive professors, and modern facilities. Two negative reviews expressed disappointment with course content value and exam transparency.
With a 4.35/5 average rating from 20 reviews, approximately 95% are positive. Students praise academic reputation, qualified faculty, and supportive learning environments. No negative reviews were submitted.
With ~74% positive reviews, students praise the modern, supportive academic environment, knowledgeable lecturers, and diverse community. A small amount of feedback (~5.3%) notes a focus on theory over practical work experience.
Two out of three reviews are positive, with an average rating of 3.67/5. Students appreciate diverse interdisciplinary learning and international opportunities, while some note excessive class hours and lack of group work.
About 64% of reviews highlight an inspiring, creative environment with supportive faculty and practical learning. A small portion of feedback (around 9%) mentions apathy from some professors and issues with curriculum execution.
Excellent university, with experienced professors, professionals in the areas they teach and with an incomparable teacher-student proximity.It is a very good university for International students since thet offer Portuguese classes and some subjects are in English. In terms of infrastructure, despite being small and not having all the conditions and equipment, it brings together a pleasant environment for studying - in addition to very good cleaning conditions and modern rooms. At the administrative level, it is organized. As for the students, many are very interested in being there, excellent students and enormous dedication.
Having recently concluded my Bachelor in Law at the University of Lisbon I am now able to look back and reflect on my experience. In summary, I would say the Faculty of Law stands out on four aspects: 1. Recognition - recognized as a top University in Portugal it definitely enhances career prospects, especially internationally. 2. Erasmus programs - I participated in two exchange programs, taking place in another Portuguese city and in the European Union. 3. Location and Student Life - the Faculty is located in the city center making it easy to enjoy the cosmopolitan life. There are several student activities throughout the year including parties and events. 4. Evaluation system - even though the curriculum is tough you get many opportunities to pass. Through participation, written exams or oral exams the evaluation period is long but allows you to keep trying. That being said, the Faculty definitely has its problems: 1. Professors - you never know what kind of class you will land on. Could be the best teacher you ever had, one that makes you interested and wanting to participate. Could be the worst you will ever be in contact with, intimidating and insulting making you want to quit. You will question your decision. 2. The Faculty does not care about you. Weather this is true or not you will, at some point, feel like the faculty does not care for its students' interests and problems. From changing evaluation methods and dates of exams in the middle of a semester to never getting answers back on important emails or waiting months for your grades to come out. Important note: This is not true for the staff workers, who will always offer you a smile and kind words! 3. Facilities - apart from the beautiful grandiose entrance the Faculty itself was very lacking. Some of the bathrooms were recently renovated but most remain dilapidated with every single door unable to properly close and lock. The amphitheaters are spacious but the classrooms fitting sometimes more than 30 students have crammed old desks and get especially cold during winter. The library is good but lacks space funneling the traffic to the study room, where the space is uncomfortable and lacking in outlets. Overall you will be able to cover all the bases related to law, in a challenging setting and enjoy all the great things Portugal has to offer, without breaking your bank account.
Sound an Image is one of the 3 programmes from the School of the Arts. It is also, in my experience, the most neglected. This came in the form of less equipment available (priority given to the Cinema course), abysmal workshop conditions (very little space, missing or broken equipment) and not even a designated space where the Year 3 students could storage their Final Project material (I had to constantly fix or rebuild some of my materials). The curriculum itself is very good. Sound an Image is not a full on technical course, and the theoretical classes do help in developing an artistic sensibility and vision - the professors are also, for the most part, engaged and helpful. Lastly, we may have the poorest Student Association in Porto - low budget and little freedom. It's important to note that the programme has changed a lot along the years, recently going through changes on a yearly basis. Allegedly, upcoming students will have better conditions and equipment, as well as more practical projects. Closing remarks: in all honesty, I wouldn't go here without at least a half scholarship. I do not feel the full tuition matches the value of the course. However, Católica is more than a single programme. There's a lot of talks with speakers from different areas, from artists to cientists and other professional backgrounds. There's a psychology service with different workshops. There's a weekly cinema session organized by the Cinema students. There's all these extracurricular things that do bring their value to the school.
Nothing to show
The university is very inclusive.Everybody is the same, no matter age, race, gender, sexuality, style etc... This inclusivity also makes the atmosphere in the faculty great! Every break there is someone playing music, singing, drinking and smoking (responsibly) The teachers are also very nice. The classes are always relaxed and we even get a few laughs.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
