Imperial College London vs London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs Brunel University London vs University of Roehampton vs Ravensbourne University London
Side-by-side comparison from 798 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Attentive, professional, and helpful professors
- +Strong academic reputation and research focus
- +Excellent campus facilities, resources, and location for job opportunities
- +Knowledgeable and approachable faculty
- +High-quality academic programs and clear feedback
- +Excellent facilities and resources
- +Practical, career-focused learning with industry relevance
- +Supportive and engaging teaching staff
- +Accessible campus and useful resources
- +Practical experience through placements and hands-on training
- +Supportive and dedicated lecturers
- +Positive campus environment and community feel
- +Industry-focused approach and real-world projects
- +Modern facilities and high-tech creative equipment
- +Strong industry connections and career preparation
- +Exceptional teaching quality from passionate, experienced instructors
- +Unmatched precision, emphasis on quality, and professional skill development
- +Welcoming environment, strong support, and valuable alumni network
- +International relevance & practical/hands-on experience
- +Welcoming & supportive environment with friendly, helpful staff/faculty
- +Diverse, small classes with experienced professors
- -Small campus and limited food options are disliked.
- -Administrative and management issues are a point of contention.
- -Facilities, while generally good, are noted as being outdated.
- -Poor teaching quality and unstructured courses.
- -High fees combined with lack of support and career services.
- -Limited social life and judgmental environment.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant concern.
- -Outdated course content and confusing teaching methods are frustrating.
- -Poor communication and lack of professionalism are prevalent.
- -Administrative & management issues are a major source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Lack of support and resources is frequently mentioned.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are major concerns.
- -Ineffective communication and unclear expectations cause confusion and dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are disappointing.
- -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from real-world needs.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are often criticized.
- -Poor teaching quality and unengaging course content are commonly cited.
With strong scores in **Internationality (4.70)** and **Location (4.64)**, this institution offers a globally connected and conveniently situated environment. Ratings for **Facilities (4.37)** and **Professors (4.34)** also indicate solid strengths. Conversely, **Student Life (3.98)** and **Accomodation (3.99)** received the lowest, though still respectable, scores, suggesting these areas have the most room for improvement.
Examining the university's performance reveals a diverse set of scores. The strongest areas are **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving very high marks. **Student Life** stands out as the weakest performing category. Other areas like **Professors**, **Accomodation**, and **Facilities** received solid, above-average ratings, with **Value** also scoring positively.
This institution garners a strong overall rating, particularly excelling in **Internationality** with a score of 4.33. **Professors** and **Value** also receive high marks. Conversely, **Accomodation** and **Location** present the weakest areas, scoring 3.61 and 3.72 respectively. Facilities, student life, and professors all fall within a commendable 3.8 to 4.0 range.
Professors and facilities are highly regarded at this institution, earning top marks. Student life and location also receive favorable reviews. While generally positive, accommodation and value represent the areas with the lowest scores, indicating potential for improvement. Internationality is rated solidly in the middle.
Assessing various university aspects reveals a mixed picture. The institution excels in its **location**, scoring a high 4.4. **Facilities** and **Professors** also receive strong marks, indicating well-equipped campuses and effective teaching. Student life offers a moderate experience, while **internationality** stands at a solid 4.0. The weakest area is **accommodation**, with a rating of 3, suggesting room for improvement in student housing. Overall value is rated moderately well.
This university demonstrates exceptional strength in its **location** (4.7), **professors** (4.6), and **internationality** (4.6). Students are particularly impressed with the quality of instruction and the global environment. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at 3.0, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect. Student life and value for money also received moderate scores.
Student feedback indicates strong satisfaction across several aspects of university life. Location stands out as the highest-rated area, with internationality and professors also receiving excellent marks. While student life and value are also highly regarded, facilities represent the weakest area among the surveyed categories. Overall, the institution demonstrates a solid performance with clear strengths in its external and academic offerings.
With a 4.33/5 average rating and ~99.6% positive feedback, students praise attentive professors, impressive research, great campus facilities, and strong networking opportunities. Very limited negative feedback exists.
Approximately 96.6% of reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable professors, supportive learning environments, and strong academic reputations. A small percentage (around 3.4%) of negative feedback cites issues with lecturing, grading, and course structure.
Over 97% of reviews are positive, highlighting career-focused degrees, practical learning, and supportive lecturers. A small amount of negative feedback mentions visa issues and course content clarity.
With an average rating of 4.49/5, ~91% of 45 reviews are positive. Students praise the holistic, evidence-based nursing practice, valuable clinical placements, and supportive environment. Some mention inconsistent mentor support and slow administration.
Approximately 100% of reviews are positive, highlighting practical, industry-focused learning and modern, inspiring creative facilities. Students appreciate the university's strong industry connections and hands-on approach.
Students highly praise the exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable instructors. Facilities are noted as impeccable and the learning environment welcoming, contributing to professional and personal growth for ~100% of reviewers.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~95% of feedback highlighting an engaging, internationally relevant learning experience and a welcoming environment. Students appreciate practical learning, helpful staff, and international class settings. No negative feedback was recorded.
The University included different subjects which suitable for different person. Professors are nice and professional. When You have any questions, they are always ready to help and discuss with you. You can enjoy the study environment, the facilities in campus is in very good condition.
LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
First of all since my campus was in the heart of Rome, the place and inside of the university was like a whole museum. I love how friendly and helpful the staff was, the professors were one in a million. I love how they did all their best to tell us about the subjects in detail and in a fun way with examples for us to get into it more. I liked how they make time and engage in it and actually help us to teach us, so it was all in one reading writing with our own brain and infos searching for the sources by ourselves listening but also being able to express our own way of knowledge on the topics!
