London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs London Metropolitan University vs City St George’s, University of London - City vs University of Greenwich - UoG vs Ravensbourne University London

Side-by-side comparison from 586 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Le Cordon Bleu Paris (4.70)
London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE: wins 1/7 categories
London Metropolitan University: wins 0/7 categories
City St George’s, University of London - City: wins 1/7 categories
University of Greenwich - UoG: wins 1/7 categories
Ravensbourne University London: wins 0/7 categories
SOAS University of London: wins 2/7 categories
Le Cordon Bleu Paris: wins 2/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Economics
London, The United Kingdom
4.20
Read more reviews
44 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Management
Best programme: Law
London, The United Kingdom
4.40
Read more reviews
64 reviews
×
Best programme: Computer Science
London, The United Kingdom
3.80
Read more reviews
12 reviews
×
Best programme: Animation
London, The United Kingdom
4.10
Read more reviews
34 reviews
×
Best programme: International Relations
4.70
Top
Read more reviews
9 reviews
×
Best programme: Culinary Arts
Category ratings
Facilities
4.04
4.06
4.37
4.25
4.17
3.97
4.56
Win
Location
4.78
4.51
4.10
4.52
4.33
4.85
Win
4.78
Professors
4.26
4.33
4.22
4.34
4.00
4.32
4.67
Win
Internationality
4.80
Win
4.51
4.35
4.56
3.92
4.62
4.67
Student life
3.63
3.92
4.17
4.25
3.33
4.29
Win
4.00
Value
4.04
4.05
4.13
4.23
Win
3.83
4.06
4.00
Accommodation
3.78
3.43
3.94
Win
3.82
2.92
3.65
3.22
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Expert and experienced faculty
  • +Supportive and collaborative community atmosphere
  • +Diverse and flexible learning and assessment methods
  • +Supportive and accessible faculty and staff
  • +Diverse and multicultural environment
  • +Career-focused and practical learning opportunities
  • +Central location and accessibility
  • +Knowledgeable and supportive staff/tutors
  • +High-quality, engaging education and opportunities
  • +Supportive and approachable faculty
  • +Welcoming and vibrant campus community
  • +Practical learning and real-world exposure
  • +Industry connections and career readiness
  • +Practical, hands-on learning and skill development
  • +Inspiring and welcoming creative environment
  • +Diverse and inclusive community.
  • +Global perspectives and academic rigor.
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty.
  • +exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable, approachable instructors
  • +strong emphasis on precision, quality, and professional skill development
  • +welcoming environment and supportive alumni network
Cons
  • -Poor teaching quality and lack of structure in academic programs.
  • -Inadequate support services and limited social opportunities.
  • -High fees with perceived low value and administrative issues.
  • -Unprofessional teaching and poorly structured courses.
  • -Inadequate facilities and lack of support from the program office.
  • -Insufficient preparation for the real working world.
  • -Poor teaching quality and ineffective lectures.
  • -Lack of academic rigor and research standards.
  • -Financial focus over student learning and career preparation.
  • -Poor organization and lecturer availability are significant problems.
  • -Disruptions from strikes negatively impacted the learning experience.
  • -The value for money is perceived as poor.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are a problem.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and course structure is disappointing.
  • -Poor administrative support and communication lead to unresolved issues.
  • -Lack of adequate support services and advice negatively impacts student well-being and finances.
  • -Uncommunicated changes and issues with departmental structure cause significant disruption.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of career support and industry relevance leads to dissatisfaction.
Rating summary
What students say

Perceived strengths of this institution lie significantly in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both receiving top marks. Conversely, **Student Life** emerges as the area with the lowest reported satisfaction. Ratings for Facilities, Professors, Accomodation, and Value fall within a moderate to good range, indicating generally positive feedback across these aspects.

This institution receives outstanding marks for its **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring above 4.5. **Professors** are also highly regarded, with a rating of over 4.3. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the lowest-rated aspect, falling below 3.5. Other categories like Facilities, Student Life, and Value are rated moderately well, generally ranging from approximately 3.9 to 4.1.

Offering a well-rounded experience, this institution excels in its **Facilities** and **Internationality**, both receiving ratings above 4.3. **Professors** and **Student Life** also score highly, indicating positive academic and social environments. The **Value** proposition is solid at over 4.1. However, **Accomodation** presents the area with the lowest score, falling below 4.0, suggesting it could benefit from improvement.

Overall, the university garners positive feedback, with **Internationality** and **Location** emerging as its strongest attributes, both receiving ratings above 4.5. **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower score. Ratings for Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Value are consistently strong, generally falling within the 4.2 to 4.3 range, indicating a well-rounded experience.

The university demonstrates considerable strengths in its **location**, receiving a high rating of 4.33. **Facilities** also score well at 4.17. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 2.92. **Student life** is another area that could see improvement, scoring 3.33. Other aspects like professors, internationality, and value are rated moderately.

This university garners high marks, particularly excelling in its prime **location**, which received a near-perfect score. **Internationality** and **Student Life** also stand out positively. Conversely, **Accommodations** present the lowest-rated aspect. Other areas like **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Value** are generally rated well, indicating a solid overall offering with specific strengths and one area for potential improvement.

This institution receives high marks for its Location, scoring 4.78, and for its Professors and Internationality, both at 4.67. Facilities also rate well at 4.56. Student Life and Value are both solid at 4.00. The weakest area is Accomodation, which received a rating of 3.22.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Most reviews (~74%) are positive, praising academic reputation, expert faculty, and excellent resources. A small percentage (~3.4%) express dissatisfaction with lecturing quality, course structure, or career services.

Approximately 93% of reviews are positive, highlighting diverse courses, supportive mentors, and welcoming staff. A small percentage of feedback (~7%) mentions issues with course structure and facilities.

With a 4.32 average rating from 101 reviews, approximately 93% are positive, praising the university's excellent location, helpful staff, and engaging course content. A small 2% of feedback offered criticism.

With a 4.42 average rating from 64 reviews, ~87% of feedback is positive, highlighting supportive faculty, a vibrant community, and a beautiful campus. A small amount of negative feedback (~1.6%) noted organizational issues and lecturer inconsistency.

With ~74% positive feedback, students highlight Ravensbourne's inspirational environment, industry connections, and focus on digital and creative learning. No negative feedback was reported.

~76% of 34 reviews are positive, praising global perspectives, diverse community, and supportive professors. A small percentage of negative feedback (approximately 5.9%) mentions issues with administrative support and communication.

All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlight exceptional teaching quality and knowledgeable instructors, along with impeccable facilities. The curriculum and emphasis on precision are frequently praised.

Rating distribution
5★
34%
48%
43%
56%
17%
41%
67%
4★
44%
36%
50%
31%
50%
35%
33%
3★
19%
9%
6%
11%
33%
18%
0%
2★
2%
5%
1%
2%
0%
3%
0%
1★
1%
2%
1%
0%
0%
3%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Great Experience

LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.

International experience

LondonMet is a great place to have an international experience for foreign students @ different levels. Whether you may search for an affordable and certified executive studies or you may search for a multicultural experience meeting people from all over the world. I personally, find it a great option for a post graduate level of studies.

Unlocking My Potential at City University London

My time at City University London was truly transformative. The university's vibrant community and diverse extracurricular activities allowed me to forge lifelong friendships and professional connections that extend beyond the classroom. I was impressed by the university's commitment to academic rigor, character development, and personal growth, which created an ideal environment for me to reach my full potential. The research-driven and industry-relevant curriculum provided me with a solid foundation in international business, while the dedicated faculty and staff offered invaluable guidance and support. I feel grateful for the well-rounded education and holistic experience that City University London offered, preparing me for success in my career and beyond.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

The community

I am originally from the USA but decided to pursue my Masters degree in London. My university has a large diverse community of students. I was able to thrive in this environment as I was accepted for being myself. I am Proud to be a SOAS graduate.

Student in 2013

I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close