London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs Middlesex University - MDX vs University of the West of Scotland - UWS vs University of Greenwich - UoG vs Ravensbourne University London
Side-by-side comparison from 615 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Knowledgeable and approachable faculty
- +High-quality academic programs and clear feedback
- +Excellent facilities and resources
- +Supportive, passionate, and approachable staff.
- +Practical, relevant courses with real-world application.
- +Positive, friendly campus atmosphere and strong sense of community.
- +Supportive, knowledgeable, and accessible faculty
- +Engaging, innovative, and comprehensive course content
- +Vibrant campus life and diverse student community
- +Diverse student body and international environment
- +Supportive and approachable faculty/teachers
- +Good facilities and varied course offerings
- +Industry-focused approach and real-world projects
- +Modern facilities and high-tech creative equipment
- +Strong industry connections and career preparation
- +Exceptional teaching quality from passionate, experienced instructors
- +Unmatched precision, emphasis on quality, and professional skill development
- +Welcoming environment, strong support, and valuable alumni network
Nothing to show
- -Poor teaching quality and unstructured courses.
- -High fees combined with lack of support and career services.
- -Limited social life and judgmental environment.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and unengaging.
- -Lack of academic and administrative support.
- -Ineffective teaching and unclear assignment guidance.
- -Insufficient time for major projects.
- -Disappointing teaching quality and organizational issues
- -Disruptions from strikes and poor value for money
- -Lack of lecturer availability and communication problems
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are major concerns.
- -Ineffective communication and unclear expectations cause confusion and dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are disappointing.
- -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from real-world needs.
Nothing to show
Examining the university's performance reveals a diverse set of scores. The strongest areas are **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving very high marks. **Student Life** stands out as the weakest performing category. Other areas like **Professors**, **Accomodation**, and **Facilities** received solid, above-average ratings, with **Value** also scoring positively.
This university demonstrates a strong performance across most surveyed aspects, with professors, internationality, location, and facilities all receiving high marks, averaging above 4.2. Student life and value also score well. The weakest area, however, is accommodation, which stands at a notably lower rating.
Demonstrating robust strengths in key areas, this university excels with particularly high marks for its professors and internationality. Facilities and value are also well-regarded. Conversely, student life and accommodation present as areas for potential improvement, receiving the lowest scores. Location also shows room for enhancement.
This institution demonstrates strong performance in its **location** and **internationality**, both receiving high marks. **Accommodations** are rated the lowest among the surveyed categories. Other areas like **professors**, **facilities**, and **student life** all score well, indicating a generally positive experience. **Value** for money also registers favorably.
Assessing various university aspects reveals a mixed picture. The institution excels in its **location**, scoring a high 4.4. **Facilities** and **Professors** also receive strong marks, indicating well-equipped campuses and effective teaching. Student life offers a moderate experience, while **internationality** stands at a solid 4.0. The weakest area is **accommodation**, with a rating of 3, suggesting room for improvement in student housing. Overall value is rated moderately well.
This university demonstrates exceptional strength in its **location** (4.7), **professors** (4.6), and **internationality** (4.6). Students are particularly impressed with the quality of instruction and the global environment. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at 3.0, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect. Student life and value for money also received moderate scores.
Nothing to show
Approximately 96.6% of reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable professors, supportive learning environments, and strong academic reputations. A small percentage (around 3.4%) of negative feedback cites issues with lecturing, grading, and course structure.
With ~89% positive reviews and an average 4.25/5 rating, students highlight a friendly campus vibe, engaging events, and supportive, knowledgeable staff. Some mention practical, industry-relevant courses and good group project opportunities. No negative feedback was reported.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting valuable courses, supportive faculty, and a lively student environment. A single negative review mentioned a lack of course support and unhelpful lecturers.
Approximately 98.5% of reviews are positive, highlighting diversity, helpful faculty, and good campus facilities. A small portion of feedback notes inconsistent teaching quality and organizational issues.
Approximately 100% of reviews are positive, highlighting practical, industry-focused learning and modern, inspiring creative facilities. Students appreciate the university's strong industry connections and hands-on approach.
Students highly praise the exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable instructors. Facilities are noted as impeccable and the learning environment welcoming, contributing to professional and personal growth for ~100% of reviewers.
Nothing to show
LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.
most teachers are very patient when helping and explaining to student with questions, the time table planning is not great, responsible team is only accepting online request which the reply was always unable to make changes(except health related issues )
The lecturers in my programme are quite helpful. Would recommend they infuse some kind of practice or practicality into the program. A little bit of programme coordination, and more interaction with peers should be incorporated.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
Nothing to show
