IÉSEG School of Management vs ONCAMPUS Global vs EPF Graduate School of Engineering - EPF vs IUT De Sceaux vs ESSCA School of Management
Side-by-side comparison from 334 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Engaging and practical learning experiences
- +Strong international and diverse community
- +Opportunities for personal and professional growth
- +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
- +Excellent facilities and convenient location
- +Strong academic and personal development support
- +Diverse specializations and flexible program to find vocation
- +International opportunities and engaging student life
- +Practical learning through projects and supportive professors
- +Relevant practical experience and industry-connected faculty
- +High-quality educational system overall
- +Strong recommendation to others
- +High-quality, practical education with specialized pathways.
- +Supportive, close-knit learning environment and friendly atmosphere.
- +Vibrant campus life with numerous enriching activities and social connections.
- +Exceptional teaching quality from passionate, experienced instructors
- +Unmatched precision, emphasis on quality, and professional skill development
- +Welcoming environment, strong support, and valuable alumni network
- +Diverse student and educator backgrounds
- +Opportunities for personal and career growth
- +Supportive and organized academic environment
- -Frequent last-minute changes disrupt scheduling and planning.
- -Perceived lack of effort to improve the classroom experience.
- -Concerns about course offerings and professor quality.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep frustrate students.
- -Lack of resources and inadequate support services are common complaints.
- -Administrative and management issues are a consistent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently criticized.
- -Lack of resources and support hinders academic progress.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are a problem.
- -Course content and teaching quality can be disappointing.
- -Poor quality and preparedness of professors
- -Lack of relevance in courses and teaching
- -Ineffective organization and management
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are disappointing.
- -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from real-world needs.
- -Limited extracurriculars and career opportunities.
- -Poor quality of facilities and overall environment.
- -Lack of academic rigor and student engagement.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in several key areas, with Internationality receiving the highest score. Location and Value also received very favorable ratings. Conversely, Accomodation emerged as the area with the lowest score, indicating room for improvement in this aspect of the student experience. Overall, the university presents a compelling offering across most dimensions.
Overall, the university garners strong ratings across various aspects. Professors are exceptionally well-regarded, achieving the highest score. Location and Internationality also stand out with excellent marks. Student Life, Facilities, and Value also reflect positive sentiment. Accommodation, while still strong, receives the lowest rating among the surveyed categories.
Across surveyed categories, the institution demonstrates a strong profile. Student Life stands out as the highest-rated aspect, suggesting a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, Accommodation received the lowest score, indicating a potential area for improvement. Ratings for Facilities, Professors, Location, Internationality, and Value are all positive and generally align with each other, painting a picture of a well-rounded university experience.
Overall, this institution garners a strong performance with an average rating of 3.8. Student life shines brightest, achieving an impressive 4.2, closely followed by facilities and value, both scoring a solid 4. Conversely, accommodation presents the most significant area for improvement, receiving a rating of 3. Location also falls slightly below the average at 3.2.
This institution excels in its **location**, receiving the highest rating. Student life and internationality are also well-regarded. However, **accommodation** presents the weakest area, with a lower score compared to other aspects. The university demonstrates a solid standing in facilities and professors, with value also scoring respectably.
This university demonstrates exceptional strength in its **location** (4.7), **professors** (4.6), and **internationality** (4.6). Students are particularly impressed with the quality of instruction and the global environment. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at 3.0, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect. Student life and value for money also received moderate scores.
The university exhibits exceptional strengths in its location and internationality, both scoring a near-perfect 4.93. Professors also receive high marks at 4.64, complemented by strong student life (4.15) and value (4.29). The weakest areas are facilities, rated at 3.92, and accommodation, which received a 3.62.
Overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~91% of reviews being 4-5 stars and an average rating of 4.38/5. A small ~0.8% expressed concerns about learning outcomes and last-minute changes.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~100% of 20 feedback entries rating 4–5 stars. Students praise friendly, supportive teachers, excellent facilities like the library, and effective student support services that build confidence.
All 14 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.36/5. Students highlight diverse majors, international opportunities, and engaging project-based learning as key strengths.
With an average rating of 3.5/5, reviews are largely positive, highlighting the quality of the system and helpful professors. One review specifically praised the work-study program and recommended the university. No negative feedback was recorded.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting good knowledge transfer, practical experience, and vibrant campus life. A small portion (~8%) of negative feedback mentions unprepared professors and irrelevant courses.
Students highly praise the exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable instructors. Facilities are noted as impeccable and the learning environment welcoming, contributing to professional and personal growth for ~100% of reviewers.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with 13 out of 14 (93%) giving high ratings. Students praise the diverse educators and peer networks, cultural exposure, and opportunities for personal and academic growth. A small percentage of feedback (around 7%) mentions a lack of extracurricular activities and internship availability for earlier years.
IÉSEG offers interactive teaching and international opportunities. I had the chance to go on an exchange to another country, which opened up new perspectives for me. The courses in Lille are stimulating, and the professors are very involved in our success.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Overall, I had a positive experience at ESSCA. The programme is well organized and provides a solid foundation in business and management. The courses were generally of good quality and covered a broad range of topics, helping students develop both academic knowledge and practical skills. One of the aspects I appreciated most was the international exchange during the third year. ESSCA has a good network of partner universities, and the opportunity to study abroad was a valuable part of the programme. Student life is also a real strength of the school. The associative environment is active and offers many opportunities to get involved outside the classroom, meet new people, and gain additional experience. Like any programme, some courses were more engaging than others, but overall I found the experience enriching and would recommend it to students looking for a business school with a strong international dimension and a good balance between academics and extracurricular activities.
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.
